Parliamentary elections in three South-Eastern European countries

The paper examines the parliamentary elections in Croatia, Serbia and North Macedonia that took place during the summer of 2020. In all three cases, the authorities sought to quickly take advantage of the positive psychological effect of lifting the quarantine and appear as epidemic winners ahead of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pavel Kandel’
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences 2020-04-01
Series:Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН
Subjects:
Online Access:http://vestnikieran.instituteofeurope.ru/images/Kandel42020.pdf
id doaj-5dd93bb7df884ceb9eea4b60567ff688
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5dd93bb7df884ceb9eea4b60567ff6882021-02-12T09:16:23ZrusInstitute of Europe Russian Academy of SciencesНаучно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН2618-79142020-04-01293610.15211/vestnikieran420202936Parliamentary elections in three South-Eastern European countriesPavel Kandel’0 Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of SciencesThe paper examines the parliamentary elections in Croatia, Serbia and North Macedonia that took place during the summer of 2020. In all three cases, the authorities sought to quickly take advantage of the positive psychological effect of lifting the quarantine and appear as epidemic winners ahead of their electorates felt its economic consequences. Overall the ruling parties and their leaders achieved their goals – they did stay at control, but had to pay a high price for their success. In Croatia, the ruling Croatian Democratic Union and Prime Minister A. Plenkovich held power and did not allow a shift to the right-wing nationalist course many feared. However, the fragile majority that the former Prime Minister's new Cabinet is based on seems unlikely to allow him any resolute steps. The crushing victory of the Serbian Progressive Party which resulted in its constitutional majority and the absence of opposition in the Parliament proved to be pyrrhic for President A. Vucic. Enjoying full discretion, he seriously damaged already dubious legitimacy of the regime. This makes it both more compliant and cautious. The Social Democratic Union and its leader Z. Zaev in Northern Macedonia remained in power by renewing the deal with the Albanian parties, but became even more dependent on them. To conclude: the hard-fought victories have ensured the extention of power, but deprived it of essential political force.http://vestnikieran.instituteofeurope.ru/images/Kandel42020.pdfparliamentary electionscroatiaserbianorth macedoniaa. vucica. plenko- vicz. zaev
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pavel Kandel’
spellingShingle Pavel Kandel’
Parliamentary elections in three South-Eastern European countries
Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН
parliamentary elections
croatia
serbia
north macedonia
a. vucic
a. plenko- vic
z. zaev
author_facet Pavel Kandel’
author_sort Pavel Kandel’
title Parliamentary elections in three South-Eastern European countries
title_short Parliamentary elections in three South-Eastern European countries
title_full Parliamentary elections in three South-Eastern European countries
title_fullStr Parliamentary elections in three South-Eastern European countries
title_full_unstemmed Parliamentary elections in three South-Eastern European countries
title_sort parliamentary elections in three south-eastern european countries
publisher Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences
series Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН
issn 2618-7914
publishDate 2020-04-01
description The paper examines the parliamentary elections in Croatia, Serbia and North Macedonia that took place during the summer of 2020. In all three cases, the authorities sought to quickly take advantage of the positive psychological effect of lifting the quarantine and appear as epidemic winners ahead of their electorates felt its economic consequences. Overall the ruling parties and their leaders achieved their goals – they did stay at control, but had to pay a high price for their success. In Croatia, the ruling Croatian Democratic Union and Prime Minister A. Plenkovich held power and did not allow a shift to the right-wing nationalist course many feared. However, the fragile majority that the former Prime Minister's new Cabinet is based on seems unlikely to allow him any resolute steps. The crushing victory of the Serbian Progressive Party which resulted in its constitutional majority and the absence of opposition in the Parliament proved to be pyrrhic for President A. Vucic. Enjoying full discretion, he seriously damaged already dubious legitimacy of the regime. This makes it both more compliant and cautious. The Social Democratic Union and its leader Z. Zaev in Northern Macedonia remained in power by renewing the deal with the Albanian parties, but became even more dependent on them. To conclude: the hard-fought victories have ensured the extention of power, but deprived it of essential political force.
topic parliamentary elections
croatia
serbia
north macedonia
a. vucic
a. plenko- vic
z. zaev
url http://vestnikieran.instituteofeurope.ru/images/Kandel42020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pavelkandel parliamentaryelectionsinthreesoutheasterneuropeancountries
_version_ 1724273412110548992