Second Language Reading Research and Instruction: Crossing the Boundaries

Second language (L2) reading serves dual roles in L2 learning – both as a literacy skill for comprehension and as a source of L2 input (Eskey, 2005; Grabe, 1991). However, L2 reading researchers have traditionally focused on either one of the two dimensions at a time, with the other largely unattend...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jookyoung Jung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia University Libraries 2010-05-01
Series:Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL
Online Access:https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1441
id doaj-5dc316bd7c28479284fbc4eb16c16eae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5dc316bd7c28479284fbc4eb16c16eae2020-11-25T02:01:49ZengColumbia University LibrariesStudies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL2689-193X2010-05-0110110.7916/salt.v10i1.1441Second Language Reading Research and Instruction: Crossing the BoundariesJookyoung JungSecond language (L2) reading serves dual roles in L2 learning – both as a literacy skill for comprehension and as a source of L2 input (Eskey, 2005; Grabe, 1991). However, L2 reading researchers have traditionally focused on either one of the two dimensions at a time, with the other largely unattended, as is reflected in the discrepancies between literacy-oriented research and language-oriented research. With its primary goal being comprehension, literacy-oriented research has fueled most notably a whole language approach, and a skills approach, to L2 reading instruction. The whole language approach highlights the importance of higher-level processes based on background knowledge, whereas the skills approach emphasizes lower-level processes such as orthographic processing, morphological analysis, and word recognition, among others. By contrast, with language-oriented research, the acquisition approach conceptualizes reading as a vehicle for delivering L2 input that is conducive to the development of L2 competence. As can be expected, the theoretical and pedagogical chasms among these approaches have thus yielded unbalanced views on the nature of L2 reading and, more importantly, on its relationship with L2 acquisition. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1441
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jookyoung Jung
spellingShingle Jookyoung Jung
Second Language Reading Research and Instruction: Crossing the Boundaries
Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL
author_facet Jookyoung Jung
author_sort Jookyoung Jung
title Second Language Reading Research and Instruction: Crossing the Boundaries
title_short Second Language Reading Research and Instruction: Crossing the Boundaries
title_full Second Language Reading Research and Instruction: Crossing the Boundaries
title_fullStr Second Language Reading Research and Instruction: Crossing the Boundaries
title_full_unstemmed Second Language Reading Research and Instruction: Crossing the Boundaries
title_sort second language reading research and instruction: crossing the boundaries
publisher Columbia University Libraries
series Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL
issn 2689-193X
publishDate 2010-05-01
description Second language (L2) reading serves dual roles in L2 learning – both as a literacy skill for comprehension and as a source of L2 input (Eskey, 2005; Grabe, 1991). However, L2 reading researchers have traditionally focused on either one of the two dimensions at a time, with the other largely unattended, as is reflected in the discrepancies between literacy-oriented research and language-oriented research. With its primary goal being comprehension, literacy-oriented research has fueled most notably a whole language approach, and a skills approach, to L2 reading instruction. The whole language approach highlights the importance of higher-level processes based on background knowledge, whereas the skills approach emphasizes lower-level processes such as orthographic processing, morphological analysis, and word recognition, among others. By contrast, with language-oriented research, the acquisition approach conceptualizes reading as a vehicle for delivering L2 input that is conducive to the development of L2 competence. As can be expected, the theoretical and pedagogical chasms among these approaches have thus yielded unbalanced views on the nature of L2 reading and, more importantly, on its relationship with L2 acquisition.
url https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/SALT/article/view/1441
work_keys_str_mv AT jookyoungjung secondlanguagereadingresearchandinstructioncrossingtheboundaries
_version_ 1724955645026762752