Seasonal movements of wildlife and livestock in a heterogenous pastoral landscape: Implications for coexistence and community based conservation

Rangelands across the world are home to millions of pastoral people and vast wildlife populations, which create a complex landscape for conservation. Community based conservation has been used to promote human-wildlife coexistence on pastoral lands, protecting wildlife outside of official protected...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Tyrrell, Samantha Russell, David Western
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-10-01
Series:Global Ecology and Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989417301075
id doaj-5dba87496d00419180c415059d74e103
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5dba87496d00419180c415059d74e1032020-11-24T23:12:04ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942017-10-0112C597210.1016/j.gecco.2017.08.006Seasonal movements of wildlife and livestock in a heterogenous pastoral landscape: Implications for coexistence and community based conservationPeter Tyrrell0Samantha Russell1David Western2South Rift Association of Landowners, P.O. Box 15289, Nairobi 00509, KenyaSouth Rift Association of Landowners, P.O. Box 15289, Nairobi 00509, KenyaAfrican Conservation Centre, P.O. Box 15289, Nairobi 00509, KenyaRangelands across the world are home to millions of pastoral people and vast wildlife populations, which create a complex landscape for conservation. Community based conservation has been used to promote human-wildlife coexistence on pastoral lands, protecting wildlife outside of official protected areas. With the spread of community based conservation within the rangelands there is a need for more information on successful management practices. This study provides an example of this in the South Rift, Kenya, where seasonal movements of pastoralists aid coexistence. We used Density Surface Modelling (DSM), a novel tool for conservation managers in the rangelands, to predict wildlife and livestock abundance across the landscape and seasons. Wildlife grazers, zebra (Equus burchelli) and wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), follow expected metabolic patterns, feeding on short grass outside the conservation area in the wet season, before returning to the taller-lower quality grazing in the conservation areas during the drought. Browsing wildlife, impala (Aepyceros melampus) and Grant’s gazelle (Nanger granti), move from open grassland and bushland areas into thicker, denser browse as the seasons progress towards the drought. Livestock, both shoats (Ovis aries, and Capra aegagrus hircus) and cattle (Bos indicus), are managed by community grazing committees, who enforce a grazing plan that creates spatial–temporal separation between wildlife and livestock. They exploit the high-quality grazing in the livestock area during the wet season while conserving pasture in the conservation area, which is utilized only as forage is depleted. This ensures that wildlife has access to a diverse resource base across all seasons and potentially reduces competition, allowing for a diverse and abundant wildlife community to coexist with livestock. This highlights the importance of the presence and maintenance of spatial and temporal heterogeneity of forage resources, through livestock management, for community based conservation. We encourage more community based conservation initiatives in pastoral landscapes to incorporate livestock management into planning.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989417301075Density surface modellingDistance samplingHeterogeneityPastoralistsUngulates
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Tyrrell
Samantha Russell
David Western
spellingShingle Peter Tyrrell
Samantha Russell
David Western
Seasonal movements of wildlife and livestock in a heterogenous pastoral landscape: Implications for coexistence and community based conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation
Density surface modelling
Distance sampling
Heterogeneity
Pastoralists
Ungulates
author_facet Peter Tyrrell
Samantha Russell
David Western
author_sort Peter Tyrrell
title Seasonal movements of wildlife and livestock in a heterogenous pastoral landscape: Implications for coexistence and community based conservation
title_short Seasonal movements of wildlife and livestock in a heterogenous pastoral landscape: Implications for coexistence and community based conservation
title_full Seasonal movements of wildlife and livestock in a heterogenous pastoral landscape: Implications for coexistence and community based conservation
title_fullStr Seasonal movements of wildlife and livestock in a heterogenous pastoral landscape: Implications for coexistence and community based conservation
title_full_unstemmed Seasonal movements of wildlife and livestock in a heterogenous pastoral landscape: Implications for coexistence and community based conservation
title_sort seasonal movements of wildlife and livestock in a heterogenous pastoral landscape: implications for coexistence and community based conservation
publisher Elsevier
series Global Ecology and Conservation
issn 2351-9894
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Rangelands across the world are home to millions of pastoral people and vast wildlife populations, which create a complex landscape for conservation. Community based conservation has been used to promote human-wildlife coexistence on pastoral lands, protecting wildlife outside of official protected areas. With the spread of community based conservation within the rangelands there is a need for more information on successful management practices. This study provides an example of this in the South Rift, Kenya, where seasonal movements of pastoralists aid coexistence. We used Density Surface Modelling (DSM), a novel tool for conservation managers in the rangelands, to predict wildlife and livestock abundance across the landscape and seasons. Wildlife grazers, zebra (Equus burchelli) and wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), follow expected metabolic patterns, feeding on short grass outside the conservation area in the wet season, before returning to the taller-lower quality grazing in the conservation areas during the drought. Browsing wildlife, impala (Aepyceros melampus) and Grant’s gazelle (Nanger granti), move from open grassland and bushland areas into thicker, denser browse as the seasons progress towards the drought. Livestock, both shoats (Ovis aries, and Capra aegagrus hircus) and cattle (Bos indicus), are managed by community grazing committees, who enforce a grazing plan that creates spatial–temporal separation between wildlife and livestock. They exploit the high-quality grazing in the livestock area during the wet season while conserving pasture in the conservation area, which is utilized only as forage is depleted. This ensures that wildlife has access to a diverse resource base across all seasons and potentially reduces competition, allowing for a diverse and abundant wildlife community to coexist with livestock. This highlights the importance of the presence and maintenance of spatial and temporal heterogeneity of forage resources, through livestock management, for community based conservation. We encourage more community based conservation initiatives in pastoral landscapes to incorporate livestock management into planning.
topic Density surface modelling
Distance sampling
Heterogeneity
Pastoralists
Ungulates
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989417301075
work_keys_str_mv AT petertyrrell seasonalmovementsofwildlifeandlivestockinaheterogenouspastorallandscapeimplicationsforcoexistenceandcommunitybasedconservation
AT samantharussell seasonalmovementsofwildlifeandlivestockinaheterogenouspastorallandscapeimplicationsforcoexistenceandcommunitybasedconservation
AT davidwestern seasonalmovementsofwildlifeandlivestockinaheterogenouspastorallandscapeimplicationsforcoexistenceandcommunitybasedconservation
_version_ 1725602554749911040