The Banished Scholar: Beverland, Sex, and Liberty in the Seventeenth-Century Low Countries

Scholar Hadriaan Beverland was banished from Holland in 1679. Why was this humanist exiled from one of the most tolerant parts of Europe in the seventeenth century? This article argues that it was Beverland’s singular focus on sexual lust that got him into such great trouble. In his studies, he high...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karen Hollewand
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Journals 2017-12-01
Series:Early Modern Low Countries
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.emlc-journal.org/articles/10.18352/emlc.27/
id doaj-5da9dfeaaa9048ca862f468612dd17bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5da9dfeaaa9048ca862f468612dd17bf2021-07-02T21:41:52ZengOpen JournalsEarly Modern Low Countries2543-15872017-12-011227329610.18352/emlc.2723The Banished Scholar: Beverland, Sex, and Liberty in the Seventeenth-Century Low CountriesKaren HollewandScholar Hadriaan Beverland was banished from Holland in 1679. Why was this humanist exiled from one of the most tolerant parts of Europe in the seventeenth century? This article argues that it was Beverland’s singular focus on sexual lust that got him into such great trouble. In his studies, he highlighted the importance of sex in human nature, history, and his own society. Dutch theologians disliked his theology, exegesis, and his use of erudition to mock their authority. His humanist colleagues did not support him either, since Beverland threatened the basis of the humanist enterprise by drawing attention to the sexual side of the classical world. And Dutch magistrates were happy to convict the young scholar, because he had insolently accused them of hypocrisy. By restricting sex to marriage, in compliance with Reformed doctrine, secular authorities upheld a sexual morality that was unattainable, Beverland argued, and he proposed honest discussion of the problem of sex. This article shows that by exposing the gap between principle and practice, Beverland highlighted the hypocrisy of a deeply conflicted elite at a precarious time, since the Dutch Golden Age had started disintegrating by the late-seventeenth century. Positioning Beverland’s fate in this context of change, his story and scholarship provide a fresh perspective on the intellectual environment of the Low Countries in this period.http://www.emlc-journal.org/articles/10.18352/emlc.27/Hadriaan Beverland , humanism, original sin, history of sexuality, lust, sexual liberty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Karen Hollewand
spellingShingle Karen Hollewand
The Banished Scholar: Beverland, Sex, and Liberty in the Seventeenth-Century Low Countries
Early Modern Low Countries
Hadriaan Beverland , humanism, original sin, history of sexuality, lust, sexual liberty
author_facet Karen Hollewand
author_sort Karen Hollewand
title The Banished Scholar: Beverland, Sex, and Liberty in the Seventeenth-Century Low Countries
title_short The Banished Scholar: Beverland, Sex, and Liberty in the Seventeenth-Century Low Countries
title_full The Banished Scholar: Beverland, Sex, and Liberty in the Seventeenth-Century Low Countries
title_fullStr The Banished Scholar: Beverland, Sex, and Liberty in the Seventeenth-Century Low Countries
title_full_unstemmed The Banished Scholar: Beverland, Sex, and Liberty in the Seventeenth-Century Low Countries
title_sort banished scholar: beverland, sex, and liberty in the seventeenth-century low countries
publisher Open Journals
series Early Modern Low Countries
issn 2543-1587
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Scholar Hadriaan Beverland was banished from Holland in 1679. Why was this humanist exiled from one of the most tolerant parts of Europe in the seventeenth century? This article argues that it was Beverland’s singular focus on sexual lust that got him into such great trouble. In his studies, he highlighted the importance of sex in human nature, history, and his own society. Dutch theologians disliked his theology, exegesis, and his use of erudition to mock their authority. His humanist colleagues did not support him either, since Beverland threatened the basis of the humanist enterprise by drawing attention to the sexual side of the classical world. And Dutch magistrates were happy to convict the young scholar, because he had insolently accused them of hypocrisy. By restricting sex to marriage, in compliance with Reformed doctrine, secular authorities upheld a sexual morality that was unattainable, Beverland argued, and he proposed honest discussion of the problem of sex. This article shows that by exposing the gap between principle and practice, Beverland highlighted the hypocrisy of a deeply conflicted elite at a precarious time, since the Dutch Golden Age had started disintegrating by the late-seventeenth century. Positioning Beverland’s fate in this context of change, his story and scholarship provide a fresh perspective on the intellectual environment of the Low Countries in this period.
topic Hadriaan Beverland , humanism, original sin, history of sexuality, lust, sexual liberty
url http://www.emlc-journal.org/articles/10.18352/emlc.27/
work_keys_str_mv AT karenhollewand thebanishedscholarbeverlandsexandlibertyintheseventeenthcenturylowcountries
AT karenhollewand banishedscholarbeverlandsexandlibertyintheseventeenthcenturylowcountries
_version_ 1721321726405509120