Making it Politic(al): closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health

The anniversary of the publication of Closing the Gap in a Generation (CGG) offers a moment to reflect on the report’s contributions and shortcomings, as well as to consider the political waters ahead. The issuance of CGG was not the first time the World Health Organization (WHO) raised the problem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anne-Emanuelle Birn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Social Medicine Publication Group 2009-09-01
Series:Social Medicine
Online Access:http://www.socialmedicine.info/index.php/socialmedicine/article/view/365
id doaj-5da806a157bc4fa9a63a7fd9e35aabed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5da806a157bc4fa9a63a7fd9e35aabed2020-11-24T21:34:20ZengSocial Medicine Publication GroupSocial Medicine1557-71122009-09-0143166182Making it Politic(al): closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of HealthAnne-Emanuelle BirnThe anniversary of the publication of Closing the Gap in a Generation (CGG) offers a moment to reflect on the report’s contributions and shortcomings, as well as to consider the political waters ahead. The issuance of CGG was not the first time the World Health Organization (WHO) raised the problem of global inequalities in health. Numerous analysts and advocates have compared CGG to the 1978 Declaration of Alma-Ata. Some see CGG as a continuation of Alma-Ata; others malign it for paying insufficient attention to the principles, background documents, and lines of action proposed in the Alma-Ata declaration. We might understand the two reports as bookends to 30 years of brutal global capitalism, punctuated by the “lost decade” of the 1980s, the end of the Cold War, and, more recently, the implosion of global finance. This period saw the publication of two seminal neoliberal health manifestos –the World Bank’s 1993 World Development Report and the WHO’s 2002 Commission on Macroeconomics and Health report. Both feature the term “investing in health” in their title, conveying “a double meaning—investing [through “cost-effective,” narrow, technical interventions] to improve health, economic productivity, and poverty; and investing capital, especially private capital, as a route to private profit in the health sector.” http://www.socialmedicine.info/index.php/socialmedicine/article/view/365
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne-Emanuelle Birn
spellingShingle Anne-Emanuelle Birn
Making it Politic(al): closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health
Social Medicine
author_facet Anne-Emanuelle Birn
author_sort Anne-Emanuelle Birn
title Making it Politic(al): closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health
title_short Making it Politic(al): closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health
title_full Making it Politic(al): closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health
title_fullStr Making it Politic(al): closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health
title_full_unstemmed Making it Politic(al): closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health
title_sort making it politic(al): closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health
publisher Social Medicine Publication Group
series Social Medicine
issn 1557-7112
publishDate 2009-09-01
description The anniversary of the publication of Closing the Gap in a Generation (CGG) offers a moment to reflect on the report’s contributions and shortcomings, as well as to consider the political waters ahead. The issuance of CGG was not the first time the World Health Organization (WHO) raised the problem of global inequalities in health. Numerous analysts and advocates have compared CGG to the 1978 Declaration of Alma-Ata. Some see CGG as a continuation of Alma-Ata; others malign it for paying insufficient attention to the principles, background documents, and lines of action proposed in the Alma-Ata declaration. We might understand the two reports as bookends to 30 years of brutal global capitalism, punctuated by the “lost decade” of the 1980s, the end of the Cold War, and, more recently, the implosion of global finance. This period saw the publication of two seminal neoliberal health manifestos –the World Bank’s 1993 World Development Report and the WHO’s 2002 Commission on Macroeconomics and Health report. Both feature the term “investing in health” in their title, conveying “a double meaning—investing [through “cost-effective,” narrow, technical interventions] to improve health, economic productivity, and poverty; and investing capital, especially private capital, as a route to private profit in the health sector.”
url http://www.socialmedicine.info/index.php/socialmedicine/article/view/365
work_keys_str_mv AT anneemanuellebirn makingitpoliticalclosingthegapinagenerationhealthequitythroughactiononthesocialdeterminantsofhealth
_version_ 1725949867015012352