Systematically In Silico Comparison of Unihormonal and Bihormonal Artificial Pancreas Systems

Automated closed-loop control of blood glucose concentration is a daily challenge for type 1 diabetes mellitus, where insulin and glucagon are two critical hormones for glucose regulation. According to whether glucagon is included, all artificial pancreas (AP) systems can be divided into two types:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoteng Gao, Huangjiang Ning, Youqing Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/712496
id doaj-5d9260f19d4d473086b47b7b16373001
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5d9260f19d4d473086b47b7b163730012020-11-24T23:39:14ZengHindawi LimitedComputational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine1748-670X1748-67182013-01-01201310.1155/2013/712496712496Systematically In Silico Comparison of Unihormonal and Bihormonal Artificial Pancreas SystemsXiaoteng Gao0Huangjiang Ning1Youqing Wang2College of Information Science & Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, ChinaCollege of Information Science & Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, ChinaCollege of Information Science & Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, ChinaAutomated closed-loop control of blood glucose concentration is a daily challenge for type 1 diabetes mellitus, where insulin and glucagon are two critical hormones for glucose regulation. According to whether glucagon is included, all artificial pancreas (AP) systems can be divided into two types: unihormonal AP (infuse only insulin) and bihormonal AP (infuse both insulin and glucagon). Even though the bihormonal AP is widely considered a promising direction, related studies are very scarce due to this system’s short research history. More importantly, there are few studies to compare these two kinds of AP systems fairly and systematically. In this paper, two switching rules, P-type and PD-type, were proposed to design the logic of orchestrates switching between insulin and glucagon subsystems, where the delivery rates of both insulin and glucagon were designed by using IMC-PID method. These proposed algorithms have been compared with an optimal unihormonal system on virtual type 1 diabetic subjects. The in silico results demonstrate that the proposed bihormonal AP systems have outstanding superiorities in reducing the risk of hypoglycemia, smoothing the glucose level, and robustness with respect to insulin/glucagon sensitivity variations, compared with the optimal unihormonal AP system.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/712496
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiaoteng Gao
Huangjiang Ning
Youqing Wang
spellingShingle Xiaoteng Gao
Huangjiang Ning
Youqing Wang
Systematically In Silico Comparison of Unihormonal and Bihormonal Artificial Pancreas Systems
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
author_facet Xiaoteng Gao
Huangjiang Ning
Youqing Wang
author_sort Xiaoteng Gao
title Systematically In Silico Comparison of Unihormonal and Bihormonal Artificial Pancreas Systems
title_short Systematically In Silico Comparison of Unihormonal and Bihormonal Artificial Pancreas Systems
title_full Systematically In Silico Comparison of Unihormonal and Bihormonal Artificial Pancreas Systems
title_fullStr Systematically In Silico Comparison of Unihormonal and Bihormonal Artificial Pancreas Systems
title_full_unstemmed Systematically In Silico Comparison of Unihormonal and Bihormonal Artificial Pancreas Systems
title_sort systematically in silico comparison of unihormonal and bihormonal artificial pancreas systems
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
issn 1748-670X
1748-6718
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Automated closed-loop control of blood glucose concentration is a daily challenge for type 1 diabetes mellitus, where insulin and glucagon are two critical hormones for glucose regulation. According to whether glucagon is included, all artificial pancreas (AP) systems can be divided into two types: unihormonal AP (infuse only insulin) and bihormonal AP (infuse both insulin and glucagon). Even though the bihormonal AP is widely considered a promising direction, related studies are very scarce due to this system’s short research history. More importantly, there are few studies to compare these two kinds of AP systems fairly and systematically. In this paper, two switching rules, P-type and PD-type, were proposed to design the logic of orchestrates switching between insulin and glucagon subsystems, where the delivery rates of both insulin and glucagon were designed by using IMC-PID method. These proposed algorithms have been compared with an optimal unihormonal system on virtual type 1 diabetic subjects. The in silico results demonstrate that the proposed bihormonal AP systems have outstanding superiorities in reducing the risk of hypoglycemia, smoothing the glucose level, and robustness with respect to insulin/glucagon sensitivity variations, compared with the optimal unihormonal AP system.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/712496
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaotenggao systematicallyinsilicocomparisonofunihormonalandbihormonalartificialpancreassystems
AT huangjiangning systematicallyinsilicocomparisonofunihormonalandbihormonalartificialpancreassystems
AT youqingwang systematicallyinsilicocomparisonofunihormonalandbihormonalartificialpancreassystems
_version_ 1725514522344554496