Heterochromatin delays CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis but does not influence the outcome of mutagenic DNA repair.

Genome editing occurs in the context of chromatin, which is heterogeneous in structure and function across the genome. Chromatin heterogeneity is thought to affect genome editing efficiency, but this has been challenging to quantify due to the presence of confounding variables. Here, we develop a me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eirini M Kallimasioti-Pazi, Keerthi Thelakkad Chathoth, Gillian C Taylor, Alison Meynert, Tracy Ballinger, Martijn J E Kelder, Sébastien Lalevée, Ildem Sanli, Robert Feil, Andrew J Wood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-12-01
Series:PLoS Biology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005595
id doaj-5d84a8fbada2410c8fe18bed75f1ab24
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5d84a8fbada2410c8fe18bed75f1ab242021-07-02T17:07:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Biology1544-91731545-78852018-12-011612e200559510.1371/journal.pbio.2005595Heterochromatin delays CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis but does not influence the outcome of mutagenic DNA repair.Eirini M Kallimasioti-PaziKeerthi Thelakkad ChathothGillian C TaylorAlison MeynertTracy BallingerMartijn J E KelderSébastien LalevéeIldem SanliRobert FeilAndrew J WoodGenome editing occurs in the context of chromatin, which is heterogeneous in structure and function across the genome. Chromatin heterogeneity is thought to affect genome editing efficiency, but this has been challenging to quantify due to the presence of confounding variables. Here, we develop a method that exploits the allele-specific chromatin status of imprinted genes in order to address this problem in cycling mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Because maternal and paternal alleles of imprinted genes have identical DNA sequence and are situated in the same nucleus, allele-specific differences in the frequency and spectrum of mutations induced by CRISPR-Cas9 can be unequivocally attributed to epigenetic mechanisms. We found that heterochromatin can impede mutagenesis, but to a degree that depends on other key experimental parameters. Mutagenesis was impeded by up to 7-fold when Cas9 exposure was brief and when intracellular Cas9 expression was low. In contrast, the outcome of mutagenic DNA repair was unaffected by chromatin state, with similar efficiencies of homology-directed repair (HDR) and deletion spectra on maternal and paternal chromosomes. Combined, our data show that heterochromatin imposes a permeable barrier that influences the kinetics, but not the endpoint, of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing and suggest that therapeutic applications involving low-level Cas9 exposure will be particularly affected by chromatin status.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005595
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eirini M Kallimasioti-Pazi
Keerthi Thelakkad Chathoth
Gillian C Taylor
Alison Meynert
Tracy Ballinger
Martijn J E Kelder
Sébastien Lalevée
Ildem Sanli
Robert Feil
Andrew J Wood
spellingShingle Eirini M Kallimasioti-Pazi
Keerthi Thelakkad Chathoth
Gillian C Taylor
Alison Meynert
Tracy Ballinger
Martijn J E Kelder
Sébastien Lalevée
Ildem Sanli
Robert Feil
Andrew J Wood
Heterochromatin delays CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis but does not influence the outcome of mutagenic DNA repair.
PLoS Biology
author_facet Eirini M Kallimasioti-Pazi
Keerthi Thelakkad Chathoth
Gillian C Taylor
Alison Meynert
Tracy Ballinger
Martijn J E Kelder
Sébastien Lalevée
Ildem Sanli
Robert Feil
Andrew J Wood
author_sort Eirini M Kallimasioti-Pazi
title Heterochromatin delays CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis but does not influence the outcome of mutagenic DNA repair.
title_short Heterochromatin delays CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis but does not influence the outcome of mutagenic DNA repair.
title_full Heterochromatin delays CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis but does not influence the outcome of mutagenic DNA repair.
title_fullStr Heterochromatin delays CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis but does not influence the outcome of mutagenic DNA repair.
title_full_unstemmed Heterochromatin delays CRISPR-Cas9 mutagenesis but does not influence the outcome of mutagenic DNA repair.
title_sort heterochromatin delays crispr-cas9 mutagenesis but does not influence the outcome of mutagenic dna repair.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Biology
issn 1544-9173
1545-7885
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Genome editing occurs in the context of chromatin, which is heterogeneous in structure and function across the genome. Chromatin heterogeneity is thought to affect genome editing efficiency, but this has been challenging to quantify due to the presence of confounding variables. Here, we develop a method that exploits the allele-specific chromatin status of imprinted genes in order to address this problem in cycling mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Because maternal and paternal alleles of imprinted genes have identical DNA sequence and are situated in the same nucleus, allele-specific differences in the frequency and spectrum of mutations induced by CRISPR-Cas9 can be unequivocally attributed to epigenetic mechanisms. We found that heterochromatin can impede mutagenesis, but to a degree that depends on other key experimental parameters. Mutagenesis was impeded by up to 7-fold when Cas9 exposure was brief and when intracellular Cas9 expression was low. In contrast, the outcome of mutagenic DNA repair was unaffected by chromatin state, with similar efficiencies of homology-directed repair (HDR) and deletion spectra on maternal and paternal chromosomes. Combined, our data show that heterochromatin imposes a permeable barrier that influences the kinetics, but not the endpoint, of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing and suggest that therapeutic applications involving low-level Cas9 exposure will be particularly affected by chromatin status.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005595
work_keys_str_mv AT eirinimkallimasiotipazi heterochromatindelayscrisprcas9mutagenesisbutdoesnotinfluencetheoutcomeofmutagenicdnarepair
AT keerthithelakkadchathoth heterochromatindelayscrisprcas9mutagenesisbutdoesnotinfluencetheoutcomeofmutagenicdnarepair
AT gillianctaylor heterochromatindelayscrisprcas9mutagenesisbutdoesnotinfluencetheoutcomeofmutagenicdnarepair
AT alisonmeynert heterochromatindelayscrisprcas9mutagenesisbutdoesnotinfluencetheoutcomeofmutagenicdnarepair
AT tracyballinger heterochromatindelayscrisprcas9mutagenesisbutdoesnotinfluencetheoutcomeofmutagenicdnarepair
AT martijnjekelder heterochromatindelayscrisprcas9mutagenesisbutdoesnotinfluencetheoutcomeofmutagenicdnarepair
AT sebastienlalevee heterochromatindelayscrisprcas9mutagenesisbutdoesnotinfluencetheoutcomeofmutagenicdnarepair
AT ildemsanli heterochromatindelayscrisprcas9mutagenesisbutdoesnotinfluencetheoutcomeofmutagenicdnarepair
AT robertfeil heterochromatindelayscrisprcas9mutagenesisbutdoesnotinfluencetheoutcomeofmutagenicdnarepair
AT andrewjwood heterochromatindelayscrisprcas9mutagenesisbutdoesnotinfluencetheoutcomeofmutagenicdnarepair
_version_ 1721326000646651904