Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
Anesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed o...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/3/396 |
id |
doaj-5d813ce3588a498c8b3bac0ab1dfef1f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5d813ce3588a498c8b3bac0ab1dfef1f2020-11-24T21:21:43ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832019-03-018339610.3390/jcm8030396jcm8030396Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological PreconditioningSebastian Bunte0Tobias Lill1Maximilian Falk2Martin Stroethoff3Annika Raupach4Alexander Mathes5André Heinen6Markus W. Hollmann7Ragnar Huhn8Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, GermanyInstitute of Cardiovascular Physiology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Universitaetsstr. 1, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (AUMC), Location AMC, Meiberdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyAnesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed on a Langendorff system and perfused with Krebs–Henseleit buffer (KHB) at a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. All hearts underwent 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Three different anesthetic regimens were conducted throughout the experiments: propofol (11 μM), sevoflurane (2.5 Vol%) and dexmedetomidine (1.5 nM). Under each anesthetic regimen, pharmacological preconditioning was induced by administration of milrinone (1 μM) or levosimendan (0.3 μM) 10 min before ischemia. Infarct size was determined by TTC staining. Infarct sizes in control groups were comparable (KHB-Con: 53 ± 9%, Prop-Con: 56 ± 9%, Sevo-Con: 56 ± 8%, Dex-Con: 53 ± 9%; ns). Propofol completely abolished preconditioning by milrinone and levosimendan (Prop-Mil: 52 ± 8%, Prop-Lev: 52 ± 8%; ns versus Prop-Con), while sevoflurane did not (Sevo-Mil: 31 ± 9%, Sevo-Lev: 33 ± 7%; <i>p</i> < 0.05 versus Sevo-Con). Under dexmedetomidine, results were inconsistent; levosimendan induced infarct size reduction (Dex-Lev: 36 ± 6%; <i>p</i> < 0.05 versus Dex-Con) but not milrinone (Dex-Mil: 51 ± 8%; ns versus Dex-Con). The choice of the anesthetic regimen has an impact on infarct size reduction by pharmacological preconditioning.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/3/396preconditioningmyocardial infarctionpropofolsevofluranedexmedetomidinemilrinonelevosimendan |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sebastian Bunte Tobias Lill Maximilian Falk Martin Stroethoff Annika Raupach Alexander Mathes André Heinen Markus W. Hollmann Ragnar Huhn |
spellingShingle |
Sebastian Bunte Tobias Lill Maximilian Falk Martin Stroethoff Annika Raupach Alexander Mathes André Heinen Markus W. Hollmann Ragnar Huhn Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning Journal of Clinical Medicine preconditioning myocardial infarction propofol sevoflurane dexmedetomidine milrinone levosimendan |
author_facet |
Sebastian Bunte Tobias Lill Maximilian Falk Martin Stroethoff Annika Raupach Alexander Mathes André Heinen Markus W. Hollmann Ragnar Huhn |
author_sort |
Sebastian Bunte |
title |
Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning |
title_short |
Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning |
title_full |
Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning |
title_fullStr |
Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning |
title_sort |
impact of anesthetics on cardioprotection induced by pharmacological preconditioning |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Clinical Medicine |
issn |
2077-0383 |
publishDate |
2019-03-01 |
description |
Anesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed on a Langendorff system and perfused with Krebs–Henseleit buffer (KHB) at a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. All hearts underwent 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Three different anesthetic regimens were conducted throughout the experiments: propofol (11 μM), sevoflurane (2.5 Vol%) and dexmedetomidine (1.5 nM). Under each anesthetic regimen, pharmacological preconditioning was induced by administration of milrinone (1 μM) or levosimendan (0.3 μM) 10 min before ischemia. Infarct size was determined by TTC staining. Infarct sizes in control groups were comparable (KHB-Con: 53 ± 9%, Prop-Con: 56 ± 9%, Sevo-Con: 56 ± 8%, Dex-Con: 53 ± 9%; ns). Propofol completely abolished preconditioning by milrinone and levosimendan (Prop-Mil: 52 ± 8%, Prop-Lev: 52 ± 8%; ns versus Prop-Con), while sevoflurane did not (Sevo-Mil: 31 ± 9%, Sevo-Lev: 33 ± 7%; <i>p</i> < 0.05 versus Sevo-Con). Under dexmedetomidine, results were inconsistent; levosimendan induced infarct size reduction (Dex-Lev: 36 ± 6%; <i>p</i> < 0.05 versus Dex-Con) but not milrinone (Dex-Mil: 51 ± 8%; ns versus Dex-Con). The choice of the anesthetic regimen has an impact on infarct size reduction by pharmacological preconditioning. |
topic |
preconditioning myocardial infarction propofol sevoflurane dexmedetomidine milrinone levosimendan |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/3/396 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sebastianbunte impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT tobiaslill impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT maximilianfalk impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT martinstroethoff impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT annikaraupach impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT alexandermathes impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT andreheinen impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT markuswhollmann impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning AT ragnarhuhn impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning |
_version_ |
1725998633754558464 |