Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning

Anesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Bunte, Tobias Lill, Maximilian Falk, Martin Stroethoff, Annika Raupach, Alexander Mathes, André Heinen, Markus W. Hollmann, Ragnar Huhn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/3/396
id doaj-5d813ce3588a498c8b3bac0ab1dfef1f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5d813ce3588a498c8b3bac0ab1dfef1f2020-11-24T21:21:43ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832019-03-018339610.3390/jcm8030396jcm8030396Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological PreconditioningSebastian Bunte0Tobias Lill1Maximilian Falk2Martin Stroethoff3Annika Raupach4Alexander Mathes5André Heinen6Markus W. Hollmann7Ragnar Huhn8Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, GermanyInstitute of Cardiovascular Physiology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Universitaetsstr. 1, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (AUMC), Location AMC, Meiberdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, GermanyAnesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed on a Langendorff system and perfused with Krebs&#8211;Henseleit buffer (KHB) at a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. All hearts underwent 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Three different anesthetic regimens were conducted throughout the experiments: propofol (11 &#956;M), sevoflurane (2.5 Vol%) and dexmedetomidine (1.5 nM). Under each anesthetic regimen, pharmacological preconditioning was induced by administration of milrinone (1 &#956;M) or levosimendan (0.3 &#956;M) 10 min before ischemia. Infarct size was determined by TTC staining. Infarct sizes in control groups were comparable (KHB-Con: 53 &#177; 9%, Prop-Con: 56 &#177; 9%, Sevo-Con: 56 &#177; 8%, Dex-Con: 53 &#177; 9%; ns). Propofol completely abolished preconditioning by milrinone and levosimendan (Prop-Mil: 52 &#177; 8%, Prop-Lev: 52 &#177; 8%; ns versus Prop-Con), while sevoflurane did not (Sevo-Mil: 31 &#177; 9%, Sevo-Lev: 33 &#177; 7%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 versus Sevo-Con). Under dexmedetomidine, results were inconsistent; levosimendan induced infarct size reduction (Dex-Lev: 36 &#177; 6%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 versus Dex-Con) but not milrinone (Dex-Mil: 51 &#177; 8%; ns versus Dex-Con). The choice of the anesthetic regimen has an impact on infarct size reduction by pharmacological preconditioning.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/3/396preconditioningmyocardial infarctionpropofolsevofluranedexmedetomidinemilrinonelevosimendan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Bunte
Tobias Lill
Maximilian Falk
Martin Stroethoff
Annika Raupach
Alexander Mathes
André Heinen
Markus W. Hollmann
Ragnar Huhn
spellingShingle Sebastian Bunte
Tobias Lill
Maximilian Falk
Martin Stroethoff
Annika Raupach
Alexander Mathes
André Heinen
Markus W. Hollmann
Ragnar Huhn
Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
Journal of Clinical Medicine
preconditioning
myocardial infarction
propofol
sevoflurane
dexmedetomidine
milrinone
levosimendan
author_facet Sebastian Bunte
Tobias Lill
Maximilian Falk
Martin Stroethoff
Annika Raupach
Alexander Mathes
André Heinen
Markus W. Hollmann
Ragnar Huhn
author_sort Sebastian Bunte
title Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
title_short Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
title_full Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
title_fullStr Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Anesthetics on Cardioprotection Induced by Pharmacological Preconditioning
title_sort impact of anesthetics on cardioprotection induced by pharmacological preconditioning
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Anesthetics, especially propofol, are discussed to influence ischemic preconditioning. We investigated whether cardioprotection by milrinone or levosimendan is influenced by the clinically used anesthetics propofol, sevoflurane or dexmedetomidine. Hearts of male Wistar rats were randomised, placed on a Langendorff system and perfused with Krebs&#8211;Henseleit buffer (KHB) at a constant pressure of 80 mmHg. All hearts underwent 33 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. Three different anesthetic regimens were conducted throughout the experiments: propofol (11 &#956;M), sevoflurane (2.5 Vol%) and dexmedetomidine (1.5 nM). Under each anesthetic regimen, pharmacological preconditioning was induced by administration of milrinone (1 &#956;M) or levosimendan (0.3 &#956;M) 10 min before ischemia. Infarct size was determined by TTC staining. Infarct sizes in control groups were comparable (KHB-Con: 53 &#177; 9%, Prop-Con: 56 &#177; 9%, Sevo-Con: 56 &#177; 8%, Dex-Con: 53 &#177; 9%; ns). Propofol completely abolished preconditioning by milrinone and levosimendan (Prop-Mil: 52 &#177; 8%, Prop-Lev: 52 &#177; 8%; ns versus Prop-Con), while sevoflurane did not (Sevo-Mil: 31 &#177; 9%, Sevo-Lev: 33 &#177; 7%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 versus Sevo-Con). Under dexmedetomidine, results were inconsistent; levosimendan induced infarct size reduction (Dex-Lev: 36 &#177; 6%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 versus Dex-Con) but not milrinone (Dex-Mil: 51 &#177; 8%; ns versus Dex-Con). The choice of the anesthetic regimen has an impact on infarct size reduction by pharmacological preconditioning.
topic preconditioning
myocardial infarction
propofol
sevoflurane
dexmedetomidine
milrinone
levosimendan
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/3/396
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianbunte impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT tobiaslill impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT maximilianfalk impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT martinstroethoff impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT annikaraupach impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT alexandermathes impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT andreheinen impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT markuswhollmann impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
AT ragnarhuhn impactofanestheticsoncardioprotectioninducedbypharmacologicalpreconditioning
_version_ 1725998633754558464