Could forage peanut in low proportion replace N fertilizer in livestock systems?

Palisadegrass [Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R. D. Webster cv. Marandu] is widely used in Brazil and is typically managed with little or no N fertilizer, which often leads to pasture decline in the long-term. The current relationship between beef price and fertilizer cost in Brazil does n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vanessa Z Longhini, Abmael S Cardoso, Andressa S Berça, Robert M Boddey, Ricardo A Reis, José C B Dubeux, Ana C Ruggieri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247931
id doaj-5d7f6d9ecea74eb0b0f035fe26f6eddb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5d7f6d9ecea74eb0b0f035fe26f6eddb2021-03-14T05:31:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01163e024793110.1371/journal.pone.0247931Could forage peanut in low proportion replace N fertilizer in livestock systems?Vanessa Z LonghiniAbmael S CardosoAndressa S BerçaRobert M BoddeyRicardo A ReisJosé C B DubeuxAna C RuggieriPalisadegrass [Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R. D. Webster cv. Marandu] is widely used in Brazil and is typically managed with little or no N fertilizer, which often leads to pasture decline in the long-term. The current relationship between beef price and fertilizer cost in Brazil does not favor fertilizer use in pastures. Legume inclusion is an alternative to adding fertilizer N, but often legumes do not reach a significant proportion (> 30%) in pasture botanical composition. This study evaluated herbage responses to N inputs and pasture species composition, under intermittent stocking. Treatments included palisadegrass-forage peanut (Arachis pintoi Krapov. & W.C. Greg. cv. Amarillo) mixture (mixed), unfertilized palisadegrass (control), and palisadegrass fertilized with 150 kg N ha-1 yr-1 (fertilized). Treatments were applied over two rainy seasons with five growth cycle (GC) evaluations each season. Response variables included herbage biomass, herbage accumulation, morphological components, total aboveground N of forage peanut (TAGNFP), and contribution of biological N2 fixation (BNF). Herbage biomass was greater for fertilized palisadegrass [5850 kg dry matter (DM) ha-1] than for the palisadegrass-forage peanut mixture (3940 kg DM ha-1), while the unfertilized palisadegrass (4400 kg DM ha-1) did not differ from the mixed pasture. Nitrogen fertilizer increased leaf mass of palisadegrass (2490 kg DM ha-1) compared with the control and mixed treatments (1700 and 1310 kg DM ha-1, respectively). The contribution of BNF to the forage peanut ranged from 79 to 85% and 0.5 to 5.5 kg N ha-1 cycle-1. Overall, benefits from forage peanut were minimal because legume percentage was less than 10%, while N input in the system by N-fertilizer increased palisadegrass herbage biomass.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247931
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vanessa Z Longhini
Abmael S Cardoso
Andressa S Berça
Robert M Boddey
Ricardo A Reis
José C B Dubeux
Ana C Ruggieri
spellingShingle Vanessa Z Longhini
Abmael S Cardoso
Andressa S Berça
Robert M Boddey
Ricardo A Reis
José C B Dubeux
Ana C Ruggieri
Could forage peanut in low proportion replace N fertilizer in livestock systems?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Vanessa Z Longhini
Abmael S Cardoso
Andressa S Berça
Robert M Boddey
Ricardo A Reis
José C B Dubeux
Ana C Ruggieri
author_sort Vanessa Z Longhini
title Could forage peanut in low proportion replace N fertilizer in livestock systems?
title_short Could forage peanut in low proportion replace N fertilizer in livestock systems?
title_full Could forage peanut in low proportion replace N fertilizer in livestock systems?
title_fullStr Could forage peanut in low proportion replace N fertilizer in livestock systems?
title_full_unstemmed Could forage peanut in low proportion replace N fertilizer in livestock systems?
title_sort could forage peanut in low proportion replace n fertilizer in livestock systems?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Palisadegrass [Urochloa brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R. D. Webster cv. Marandu] is widely used in Brazil and is typically managed with little or no N fertilizer, which often leads to pasture decline in the long-term. The current relationship between beef price and fertilizer cost in Brazil does not favor fertilizer use in pastures. Legume inclusion is an alternative to adding fertilizer N, but often legumes do not reach a significant proportion (> 30%) in pasture botanical composition. This study evaluated herbage responses to N inputs and pasture species composition, under intermittent stocking. Treatments included palisadegrass-forage peanut (Arachis pintoi Krapov. & W.C. Greg. cv. Amarillo) mixture (mixed), unfertilized palisadegrass (control), and palisadegrass fertilized with 150 kg N ha-1 yr-1 (fertilized). Treatments were applied over two rainy seasons with five growth cycle (GC) evaluations each season. Response variables included herbage biomass, herbage accumulation, morphological components, total aboveground N of forage peanut (TAGNFP), and contribution of biological N2 fixation (BNF). Herbage biomass was greater for fertilized palisadegrass [5850 kg dry matter (DM) ha-1] than for the palisadegrass-forage peanut mixture (3940 kg DM ha-1), while the unfertilized palisadegrass (4400 kg DM ha-1) did not differ from the mixed pasture. Nitrogen fertilizer increased leaf mass of palisadegrass (2490 kg DM ha-1) compared with the control and mixed treatments (1700 and 1310 kg DM ha-1, respectively). The contribution of BNF to the forage peanut ranged from 79 to 85% and 0.5 to 5.5 kg N ha-1 cycle-1. Overall, benefits from forage peanut were minimal because legume percentage was less than 10%, while N input in the system by N-fertilizer increased palisadegrass herbage biomass.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247931
work_keys_str_mv AT vanessazlonghini couldforagepeanutinlowproportionreplacenfertilizerinlivestocksystems
AT abmaelscardoso couldforagepeanutinlowproportionreplacenfertilizerinlivestocksystems
AT andressasberca couldforagepeanutinlowproportionreplacenfertilizerinlivestocksystems
AT robertmboddey couldforagepeanutinlowproportionreplacenfertilizerinlivestocksystems
AT ricardoareis couldforagepeanutinlowproportionreplacenfertilizerinlivestocksystems
AT josecbdubeux couldforagepeanutinlowproportionreplacenfertilizerinlivestocksystems
AT anacruggieri couldforagepeanutinlowproportionreplacenfertilizerinlivestocksystems
_version_ 1714785815246143488