Long-Term Clinical Outcome after Sirolimus-Stent Implantation for in Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Restenosis

Restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) remains a clinical problem. We report our experience with the use a second SES in the first SES to treat in-SES restenosis. Twenty-seven patients with in-SES restenosis were included in the registry. In-SES restenosis was focal in 34%, diffuse in 59% a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alain Guidon, Stéphane Cook, Alexandre Berger, Jean-Jacques Goy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2008-01-01
Series:Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S707
id doaj-5d7690e0b8b549b48befef7829c2e22c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5d7690e0b8b549b48befef7829c2e22c2020-11-25T03:15:03ZengSAGE PublishingClinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology1179-54682008-01-01210.4137/CMC.S707Long-Term Clinical Outcome after Sirolimus-Stent Implantation for in Sirolimus-Eluting Stent RestenosisAlain Guidon0Stéphane Cook1Alexandre Berger2Jean-Jacques Goy3Service de cardiologie, Clinique Cecil, Lausanne, Switzerland. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.Service de cardiologie, Clinique Cecil, Lausanne, Switzerland. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.Service de cardiologie, Clinique Cecil, Lausanne, Switzerland. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.Service de cardiologie, Clinique Cecil, Lausanne, Switzerland. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.Restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) remains a clinical problem. We report our experience with the use a second SES in the first SES to treat in-SES restenosis. Twenty-seven patients with in-SES restenosis were included in the registry. In-SES restenosis was focal in 34%, diffuse in 59% and proliferative in 7%. The procedure was successful in all patients without any acute in-hospital complications. During a mean follow-up of 14 ± 7 months MACE occurred in 8 patients (30%), (1 death, 1 myocardial infarction, 4 target lesion revascularisation, 1 target vessel revascularisation and 1 patient underwent CABG). Nineteen patients (70%) had an event-free outcome. In conclusion SES placement to treat in-SES is safe and feasible and could be considered as a therapeutic option. However the incidence of MACE remains high on a long-term period. The use of stents has significantly improved the outcome of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) (1,2). However, despite major advances in angioplasty and stenting, in-stent restenosis remains a major limitation. Recently, drug-eluting stents and especially sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have emerged as a very promising approach in preventing restenosis, and several different compounds have been shown to have a major impact on both the angiographic and the clinical outcome (6-9). However, even after drug eluting stents implantation in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains and represents a clinical challenge. Several approaches have been proposed to deal with ISR like plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), rotational atherectomy, brachytherapy (1-3). Few reports are actually available about the use of SES in SES for ISR treatment. We report our experience about the use SES for treating an ISR after SES implantation.https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S707
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alain Guidon
Stéphane Cook
Alexandre Berger
Jean-Jacques Goy
spellingShingle Alain Guidon
Stéphane Cook
Alexandre Berger
Jean-Jacques Goy
Long-Term Clinical Outcome after Sirolimus-Stent Implantation for in Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Restenosis
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
author_facet Alain Guidon
Stéphane Cook
Alexandre Berger
Jean-Jacques Goy
author_sort Alain Guidon
title Long-Term Clinical Outcome after Sirolimus-Stent Implantation for in Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Restenosis
title_short Long-Term Clinical Outcome after Sirolimus-Stent Implantation for in Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Restenosis
title_full Long-Term Clinical Outcome after Sirolimus-Stent Implantation for in Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Restenosis
title_fullStr Long-Term Clinical Outcome after Sirolimus-Stent Implantation for in Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Restenosis
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Clinical Outcome after Sirolimus-Stent Implantation for in Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Restenosis
title_sort long-term clinical outcome after sirolimus-stent implantation for in sirolimus-eluting stent restenosis
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
issn 1179-5468
publishDate 2008-01-01
description Restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) remains a clinical problem. We report our experience with the use a second SES in the first SES to treat in-SES restenosis. Twenty-seven patients with in-SES restenosis were included in the registry. In-SES restenosis was focal in 34%, diffuse in 59% and proliferative in 7%. The procedure was successful in all patients without any acute in-hospital complications. During a mean follow-up of 14 ± 7 months MACE occurred in 8 patients (30%), (1 death, 1 myocardial infarction, 4 target lesion revascularisation, 1 target vessel revascularisation and 1 patient underwent CABG). Nineteen patients (70%) had an event-free outcome. In conclusion SES placement to treat in-SES is safe and feasible and could be considered as a therapeutic option. However the incidence of MACE remains high on a long-term period. The use of stents has significantly improved the outcome of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) (1,2). However, despite major advances in angioplasty and stenting, in-stent restenosis remains a major limitation. Recently, drug-eluting stents and especially sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have emerged as a very promising approach in preventing restenosis, and several different compounds have been shown to have a major impact on both the angiographic and the clinical outcome (6-9). However, even after drug eluting stents implantation in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains and represents a clinical challenge. Several approaches have been proposed to deal with ISR like plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), rotational atherectomy, brachytherapy (1-3). Few reports are actually available about the use of SES in SES for ISR treatment. We report our experience about the use SES for treating an ISR after SES implantation.
url https://doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S707
work_keys_str_mv AT alainguidon longtermclinicaloutcomeaftersirolimusstentimplantationforinsirolimuselutingstentrestenosis
AT stephanecook longtermclinicaloutcomeaftersirolimusstentimplantationforinsirolimuselutingstentrestenosis
AT alexandreberger longtermclinicaloutcomeaftersirolimusstentimplantationforinsirolimuselutingstentrestenosis
AT jeanjacquesgoy longtermclinicaloutcomeaftersirolimusstentimplantationforinsirolimuselutingstentrestenosis
_version_ 1724640839587594240