Driving up Standards: Civil Service Management and Decentralization: Case Study of Uganda

There is a consensus that decentralization by devolution leads to improved service delivery, but debate on the appropriate type of personnel arrangements for delivering decentralized services is far from over. Put differently, the discourse on whether civil service management should be decentralized...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lazarus Nabaho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UTS ePRESS 2012-12-01
Series:Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance
Online Access:https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/cjlg/article/view/3058
id doaj-5d6b12151a234a7083768864d3810a14
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5d6b12151a234a7083768864d3810a142020-11-25T01:04:44ZengUTS ePRESSCommonwealth Journal of Local Governance1836-03942012-12-011110.5130/cjlg.v0i0.30582011Driving up Standards: Civil Service Management and Decentralization: Case Study of UgandaLazarus Nabaho0Uganda Management Institute, Kampala, UgandaThere is a consensus that decentralization by devolution leads to improved service delivery, but debate on the appropriate type of personnel arrangements for delivering decentralized services is far from over. Put differently, the discourse on whether civil service management should be decentralized or devolved still rages on. Little wonder that countries which started off with decentralized civil service management models in the 1990s are currently centralizing some aspects of personnel management while others are having centralized and decentralized personnel arrangements operating side by side in sub-national governments. The paper argues that civil service management should be decentralized whenever a country chooses the path of decentralization by devolution. Using Uganda’s example, the paper highlights two major challenges of managing the civil service under separate personnel arrangements: civil service appointments devoid of merit, and the perennial failure to attract and retain qualified human resource. The paper presents proposals on how to ensure meritocracy in appointments and how to bolster attraction and retention of human capital in local governments.https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/cjlg/article/view/3058
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lazarus Nabaho
spellingShingle Lazarus Nabaho
Driving up Standards: Civil Service Management and Decentralization: Case Study of Uganda
Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance
author_facet Lazarus Nabaho
author_sort Lazarus Nabaho
title Driving up Standards: Civil Service Management and Decentralization: Case Study of Uganda
title_short Driving up Standards: Civil Service Management and Decentralization: Case Study of Uganda
title_full Driving up Standards: Civil Service Management and Decentralization: Case Study of Uganda
title_fullStr Driving up Standards: Civil Service Management and Decentralization: Case Study of Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Driving up Standards: Civil Service Management and Decentralization: Case Study of Uganda
title_sort driving up standards: civil service management and decentralization: case study of uganda
publisher UTS ePRESS
series Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance
issn 1836-0394
publishDate 2012-12-01
description There is a consensus that decentralization by devolution leads to improved service delivery, but debate on the appropriate type of personnel arrangements for delivering decentralized services is far from over. Put differently, the discourse on whether civil service management should be decentralized or devolved still rages on. Little wonder that countries which started off with decentralized civil service management models in the 1990s are currently centralizing some aspects of personnel management while others are having centralized and decentralized personnel arrangements operating side by side in sub-national governments. The paper argues that civil service management should be decentralized whenever a country chooses the path of decentralization by devolution. Using Uganda’s example, the paper highlights two major challenges of managing the civil service under separate personnel arrangements: civil service appointments devoid of merit, and the perennial failure to attract and retain qualified human resource. The paper presents proposals on how to ensure meritocracy in appointments and how to bolster attraction and retention of human capital in local governments.
url https://learning-analytics.info/journals/index.php/cjlg/article/view/3058
work_keys_str_mv AT lazarusnabaho drivingupstandardscivilservicemanagementanddecentralizationcasestudyofuganda
_version_ 1725196384205799424