Nephrectomy improves the survival of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with moderate to good performance status—results from a Finnish nation-wide population-based study from 2005 to 2010

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and metastasectomies on the survival of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) using real-life, population-based national dataset. Methods Nationwide data, including all...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauri Laru, Hanna Ronkainen, Pasi Ohtonen, Markku H. Vaarala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-06-01
Series:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02308-0
id doaj-5d37ee0f05174ecbac09116c97b5e1fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5d37ee0f05174ecbac09116c97b5e1fa2021-07-04T11:44:38ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192021-06-011911910.1186/s12957-021-02308-0Nephrectomy improves the survival of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with moderate to good performance status—results from a Finnish nation-wide population-based study from 2005 to 2010Lauri Laru0Hanna Ronkainen1Pasi Ohtonen2Markku H. Vaarala3Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluDepartment of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluDivision of Operative Care, Oulu University Hospital and Medical Research Center Oulu, University of OuluDepartment of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of OuluAbstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and metastasectomies on the survival of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) using real-life, population-based national dataset. Methods Nationwide data, including all cases of synchronous mRCC in Finland diagnosed on a 6-year timeframe, based on the Finnish Cancer Registry and complemented with patient records from the treating hospitals, were analyzed. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 3–4 were excluded. Univariate and adjusted multivariable survival analysis were performed, including subgroup analysis for patients with different medical therapies. Nephrectomy complications were also analyzed. Results A total of 732 patients were included in the analysis. CN was performed for 389 (53.1%) patients, whereas 68 (9.3%) patients underwent nephrectomy and metastasectomies of all lesions (surgery with curative intent). Median overall survival (OS) for patients who did not undergo nephrectomy was 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.6–7.2) months. Patients who had a CN had a median OS of 16.6 (95% CI = 14.2–19.1, p < 0.001) months, whereas patients who had surgery with curative intent had a median OS of 51.3 (95% CI = 36.0–66.6, p < 0.001) months. The survival benefit of CN and metastasectomies remained significant in all medical therapy subgroups and in both of the applied multivariable statistical models. Conclusions Surgical treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer is associated with a significant survival benefit in patients with good and moderate performance status, regardless of the chosen medical therapy.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02308-0Metastatic renal cell carcinomaRenal tumorPopulation-basedOverall survivalCytoreductive nephrectomyMetastasectomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lauri Laru
Hanna Ronkainen
Pasi Ohtonen
Markku H. Vaarala
spellingShingle Lauri Laru
Hanna Ronkainen
Pasi Ohtonen
Markku H. Vaarala
Nephrectomy improves the survival of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with moderate to good performance status—results from a Finnish nation-wide population-based study from 2005 to 2010
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Renal tumor
Population-based
Overall survival
Cytoreductive nephrectomy
Metastasectomy
author_facet Lauri Laru
Hanna Ronkainen
Pasi Ohtonen
Markku H. Vaarala
author_sort Lauri Laru
title Nephrectomy improves the survival of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with moderate to good performance status—results from a Finnish nation-wide population-based study from 2005 to 2010
title_short Nephrectomy improves the survival of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with moderate to good performance status—results from a Finnish nation-wide population-based study from 2005 to 2010
title_full Nephrectomy improves the survival of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with moderate to good performance status—results from a Finnish nation-wide population-based study from 2005 to 2010
title_fullStr Nephrectomy improves the survival of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with moderate to good performance status—results from a Finnish nation-wide population-based study from 2005 to 2010
title_full_unstemmed Nephrectomy improves the survival of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with moderate to good performance status—results from a Finnish nation-wide population-based study from 2005 to 2010
title_sort nephrectomy improves the survival of metastatic renal cell cancer patients with moderate to good performance status—results from a finnish nation-wide population-based study from 2005 to 2010
publisher BMC
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
issn 1477-7819
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and metastasectomies on the survival of patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) using real-life, population-based national dataset. Methods Nationwide data, including all cases of synchronous mRCC in Finland diagnosed on a 6-year timeframe, based on the Finnish Cancer Registry and complemented with patient records from the treating hospitals, were analyzed. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 3–4 were excluded. Univariate and adjusted multivariable survival analysis were performed, including subgroup analysis for patients with different medical therapies. Nephrectomy complications were also analyzed. Results A total of 732 patients were included in the analysis. CN was performed for 389 (53.1%) patients, whereas 68 (9.3%) patients underwent nephrectomy and metastasectomies of all lesions (surgery with curative intent). Median overall survival (OS) for patients who did not undergo nephrectomy was 5.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.6–7.2) months. Patients who had a CN had a median OS of 16.6 (95% CI = 14.2–19.1, p < 0.001) months, whereas patients who had surgery with curative intent had a median OS of 51.3 (95% CI = 36.0–66.6, p < 0.001) months. The survival benefit of CN and metastasectomies remained significant in all medical therapy subgroups and in both of the applied multivariable statistical models. Conclusions Surgical treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer is associated with a significant survival benefit in patients with good and moderate performance status, regardless of the chosen medical therapy.
topic Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Renal tumor
Population-based
Overall survival
Cytoreductive nephrectomy
Metastasectomy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-021-02308-0
work_keys_str_mv AT laurilaru nephrectomyimprovesthesurvivalofmetastaticrenalcellcancerpatientswithmoderatetogoodperformancestatusresultsfromafinnishnationwidepopulationbasedstudyfrom2005to2010
AT hannaronkainen nephrectomyimprovesthesurvivalofmetastaticrenalcellcancerpatientswithmoderatetogoodperformancestatusresultsfromafinnishnationwidepopulationbasedstudyfrom2005to2010
AT pasiohtonen nephrectomyimprovesthesurvivalofmetastaticrenalcellcancerpatientswithmoderatetogoodperformancestatusresultsfromafinnishnationwidepopulationbasedstudyfrom2005to2010
AT markkuhvaarala nephrectomyimprovesthesurvivalofmetastaticrenalcellcancerpatientswithmoderatetogoodperformancestatusresultsfromafinnishnationwidepopulationbasedstudyfrom2005to2010
_version_ 1721319956351549440