Nuclear Scan Strategy and Outcomes in Chest Pain Patients Value of Stress Testing with Dipyridamole or Adenosine

Objective: To update the prognostic value of scan strategy with pharmacological stress agent in chest pain (CP) patients presenting with normal electrocardiography (ECG) and troponin. Methods: Two consecutive nonrandomized series of patients with CP and negative first-line workup inclusive of serial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alberto Conti, Yuri Mariannini, Erica Canuti, Tetyana Petrova, Francesca Innocenti, Maurizio Zanobetti, Chiara Gallini, Egidio Costanzo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-01-01
Series:World Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.wjnm.org/article.asp?issn=1450-1147;year=2014;volume=13;issue=2;spage=94;epage=101;aulast=Conti
id doaj-5d361a89c052433eb2608a381534bbd4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5d361a89c052433eb2608a381534bbd42020-11-24T21:45:58ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsWorld Journal of Nuclear Medicine1450-11472014-01-011329410110.4103/1450-1147.139138Nuclear Scan Strategy and Outcomes in Chest Pain Patients Value of Stress Testing with Dipyridamole or AdenosineAlberto ContiYuri MarianniniErica CanutiTetyana PetrovaFrancesca InnocentiMaurizio ZanobettiChiara GalliniEgidio CostanzoObjective: To update the prognostic value of scan strategy with pharmacological stress agent in chest pain (CP) patients presenting with normal electrocardiography (ECG) and troponin. Methods: Two consecutive nonrandomized series of patients with CP and negative first-line workup inclusive of serial ECG, serial troponin, and echocardiography underwent myocardial perfusion imaging single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the emergency department. Of 170 patients enrolled, 52 patients underwent dipyridamole-SPECT and 118 adenosine-SPECT. Patients with perfusion defects underwent angiography, whereas the remaining patients were discharged and followed-up. Primary endpoint was the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, and cardiovascular death at follow-up or the presence of coronary stenosis > 50% at angiography. Results: At multivariate analysis, the presence of perfusion defects or hypertension was independent predictor of the primary endpoint. Sensitivity and negative predictive value were higher in patients subjected to adenosine-SPECT (95% and 99%, respectively) versus dipyridamole-SPECT (56% and 89%; yield 70% and 11%, respectively; P < 0.03). Of note, sensitivity, negative, and positive predictive values were high in patients with hypertension (100%, 93%, and 60%, respectively) or nonischemic echocardiography alterations (100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively). Conclusions: In CP patients, presenting with normal ECG and troponin, adenosine-SPECT adds incremental prognostic values to dipyridamole-SPECT. Costly scan strategy is more appropriate and avoids unnecessary angiograms in patients with hypertension or nonischemic echocardiography alterations.http://www.wjnm.org/article.asp?issn=1450-1147;year=2014;volume=13;issue=2;spage=94;epage=101;aulast=ContiChest painemergency medicinemyocardial ischemiamyocardial perfusion imagingnuclear medicineprognosisrisk assessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alberto Conti
Yuri Mariannini
Erica Canuti
Tetyana Petrova
Francesca Innocenti
Maurizio Zanobetti
Chiara Gallini
Egidio Costanzo
spellingShingle Alberto Conti
Yuri Mariannini
Erica Canuti
Tetyana Petrova
Francesca Innocenti
Maurizio Zanobetti
Chiara Gallini
Egidio Costanzo
Nuclear Scan Strategy and Outcomes in Chest Pain Patients Value of Stress Testing with Dipyridamole or Adenosine
World Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Chest pain
emergency medicine
myocardial ischemia
myocardial perfusion imaging
nuclear medicine
prognosis
risk assessment
author_facet Alberto Conti
Yuri Mariannini
Erica Canuti
Tetyana Petrova
Francesca Innocenti
Maurizio Zanobetti
Chiara Gallini
Egidio Costanzo
author_sort Alberto Conti
title Nuclear Scan Strategy and Outcomes in Chest Pain Patients Value of Stress Testing with Dipyridamole or Adenosine
title_short Nuclear Scan Strategy and Outcomes in Chest Pain Patients Value of Stress Testing with Dipyridamole or Adenosine
title_full Nuclear Scan Strategy and Outcomes in Chest Pain Patients Value of Stress Testing with Dipyridamole or Adenosine
title_fullStr Nuclear Scan Strategy and Outcomes in Chest Pain Patients Value of Stress Testing with Dipyridamole or Adenosine
title_full_unstemmed Nuclear Scan Strategy and Outcomes in Chest Pain Patients Value of Stress Testing with Dipyridamole or Adenosine
title_sort nuclear scan strategy and outcomes in chest pain patients value of stress testing with dipyridamole or adenosine
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series World Journal of Nuclear Medicine
issn 1450-1147
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Objective: To update the prognostic value of scan strategy with pharmacological stress agent in chest pain (CP) patients presenting with normal electrocardiography (ECG) and troponin. Methods: Two consecutive nonrandomized series of patients with CP and negative first-line workup inclusive of serial ECG, serial troponin, and echocardiography underwent myocardial perfusion imaging single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the emergency department. Of 170 patients enrolled, 52 patients underwent dipyridamole-SPECT and 118 adenosine-SPECT. Patients with perfusion defects underwent angiography, whereas the remaining patients were discharged and followed-up. Primary endpoint was the composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, revascularization, and cardiovascular death at follow-up or the presence of coronary stenosis > 50% at angiography. Results: At multivariate analysis, the presence of perfusion defects or hypertension was independent predictor of the primary endpoint. Sensitivity and negative predictive value were higher in patients subjected to adenosine-SPECT (95% and 99%, respectively) versus dipyridamole-SPECT (56% and 89%; yield 70% and 11%, respectively; P < 0.03). Of note, sensitivity, negative, and positive predictive values were high in patients with hypertension (100%, 93%, and 60%, respectively) or nonischemic echocardiography alterations (100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively). Conclusions: In CP patients, presenting with normal ECG and troponin, adenosine-SPECT adds incremental prognostic values to dipyridamole-SPECT. Costly scan strategy is more appropriate and avoids unnecessary angiograms in patients with hypertension or nonischemic echocardiography alterations.
topic Chest pain
emergency medicine
myocardial ischemia
myocardial perfusion imaging
nuclear medicine
prognosis
risk assessment
url http://www.wjnm.org/article.asp?issn=1450-1147;year=2014;volume=13;issue=2;spage=94;epage=101;aulast=Conti
work_keys_str_mv AT albertoconti nuclearscanstrategyandoutcomesinchestpainpatientsvalueofstresstestingwithdipyridamoleoradenosine
AT yurimariannini nuclearscanstrategyandoutcomesinchestpainpatientsvalueofstresstestingwithdipyridamoleoradenosine
AT ericacanuti nuclearscanstrategyandoutcomesinchestpainpatientsvalueofstresstestingwithdipyridamoleoradenosine
AT tetyanapetrova nuclearscanstrategyandoutcomesinchestpainpatientsvalueofstresstestingwithdipyridamoleoradenosine
AT francescainnocenti nuclearscanstrategyandoutcomesinchestpainpatientsvalueofstresstestingwithdipyridamoleoradenosine
AT mauriziozanobetti nuclearscanstrategyandoutcomesinchestpainpatientsvalueofstresstestingwithdipyridamoleoradenosine
AT chiaragallini nuclearscanstrategyandoutcomesinchestpainpatientsvalueofstresstestingwithdipyridamoleoradenosine
AT egidiocostanzo nuclearscanstrategyandoutcomesinchestpainpatientsvalueofstresstestingwithdipyridamoleoradenosine
_version_ 1725902927632007168