Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology
Daniel J Niven1, Luc R Berthiaume2, Gordon H Fick1, Kevin B Laupland11Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peter Lougheed Centre, Calgary, 2Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaBackground: Case-control studies are a common and efficient means of st...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2012-04-01
|
Series: | Clinical Epidemiology |
Online Access: | http://www.dovepress.com/matched-case-control-studies-a-review-of-reported-statistical-methodol-a9783 |
id |
doaj-5d35ddff5f6a43a8a0b1b3045cd4a5c3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5d35ddff5f6a43a8a0b1b3045cd4a5c32020-11-24T22:15:28ZengDove Medical PressClinical Epidemiology1179-13492012-04-012012default99110Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodologyNiven DJBerthiaume LRFick GHLauplKBDaniel J Niven1, Luc R Berthiaume2, Gordon H Fick1, Kevin B Laupland11Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peter Lougheed Centre, Calgary, 2Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaBackground: Case-control studies are a common and efficient means of studying rare diseases or illnesses with long latency periods. Matching of cases and controls is frequently employed to control the effects of known potential confounding variables. The analysis of matched data requires specific statistical methods.Methods: The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of published, peer reviewed matched case-control studies that used statistical methods appropriate for matched data. Using a comprehensive set of search criteria we identified 37 matched case-control studies for detailed analysis.Results: Among these 37 articles, only 16 studies were analyzed with proper statistical techniques (43%). Studies that were properly analyzed were more likely to have included case patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease compared to those that did not use proper statistics (10/16 or 63%, versus 5/21 or 24%, P = 0.02). They were also more likely to have matched multiple controls for each case (14/16 or 88%, versus 13/21 or 62%, P = 0.08). In addition, studies with properly analyzed data were more likely to have been published in a journal with an impact factor listed in the top 100 according to the Journal Citation Reports index (12/16 or 69%, versus 1/21 or 5%, P ≤ 0.0001).Conclusion: The findings of this study raise concern that the majority of matched case-control studies report results that are derived from improper statistical analyses. This may lead to errors in estimating the relationship between a disease and exposure, as well as the incorrect adaptation of emerging medical literature.Keywords: case-control, matched, dependent data, statisticshttp://www.dovepress.com/matched-case-control-studies-a-review-of-reported-statistical-methodol-a9783 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Niven DJ Berthiaume LR Fick GH Laupl KB |
spellingShingle |
Niven DJ Berthiaume LR Fick GH Laupl KB Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology Clinical Epidemiology |
author_facet |
Niven DJ Berthiaume LR Fick GH Laupl KB |
author_sort |
Niven DJ |
title |
Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology |
title_short |
Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology |
title_full |
Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology |
title_fullStr |
Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology |
title_sort |
matched case-control studies: a review of reported statistical methodology |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
series |
Clinical Epidemiology |
issn |
1179-1349 |
publishDate |
2012-04-01 |
description |
Daniel J Niven1, Luc R Berthiaume2, Gordon H Fick1, Kevin B Laupland11Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peter Lougheed Centre, Calgary, 2Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaBackground: Case-control studies are a common and efficient means of studying rare diseases or illnesses with long latency periods. Matching of cases and controls is frequently employed to control the effects of known potential confounding variables. The analysis of matched data requires specific statistical methods.Methods: The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of published, peer reviewed matched case-control studies that used statistical methods appropriate for matched data. Using a comprehensive set of search criteria we identified 37 matched case-control studies for detailed analysis.Results: Among these 37 articles, only 16 studies were analyzed with proper statistical techniques (43%). Studies that were properly analyzed were more likely to have included case patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease compared to those that did not use proper statistics (10/16 or 63%, versus 5/21 or 24%, P = 0.02). They were also more likely to have matched multiple controls for each case (14/16 or 88%, versus 13/21 or 62%, P = 0.08). In addition, studies with properly analyzed data were more likely to have been published in a journal with an impact factor listed in the top 100 according to the Journal Citation Reports index (12/16 or 69%, versus 1/21 or 5%, P ≤ 0.0001).Conclusion: The findings of this study raise concern that the majority of matched case-control studies report results that are derived from improper statistical analyses. This may lead to errors in estimating the relationship between a disease and exposure, as well as the incorrect adaptation of emerging medical literature.Keywords: case-control, matched, dependent data, statistics |
url |
http://www.dovepress.com/matched-case-control-studies-a-review-of-reported-statistical-methodol-a9783 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nivendj matchedcasecontrolstudiesareviewofreportedstatisticalmethodology AT berthiaumelr matchedcasecontrolstudiesareviewofreportedstatisticalmethodology AT fickgh matchedcasecontrolstudiesareviewofreportedstatisticalmethodology AT laupl matchedcasecontrolstudiesareviewofreportedstatisticalmethodology AT kb matchedcasecontrolstudiesareviewofreportedstatisticalmethodology |
_version_ |
1725794182322192384 |