Differences in East Asian Economic Institutions: Taiwan in a Regional Comparison

The term “developmental state” describes a very conscious, however, more or less market-friendly approach to economic development. The developmental states of the East Asian region can be characterized by a strong emphasis on diverse forms of state intervention generally; however, these sets of inst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: István Csaba Moldicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Sun Yat-sen University 2017-05-01
Series:Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://icaps.nsysu.edu.tw/var/file/131/1131/img/2374/CCPS3(1)-Moldicz.pdf
id doaj-5d24a82d020745b5afc27dbceb616456
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5d24a82d020745b5afc27dbceb6164562020-11-25T00:11:31ZengNational Sun Yat-sen UniversityContemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal2410-96812410-96812017-05-01312770Differences in East Asian Economic Institutions: Taiwan in a Regional ComparisonIstván Csaba Moldicz0Budapest Business School, University of Applied Sciences, HungaryThe term “developmental state” describes a very conscious, however, more or less market-friendly approach to economic development. The developmental states of the East Asian region can be characterized by a strong emphasis on diverse forms of state intervention generally; however, these sets of institutions differ in the Japanese, Taiwanese, and South Korean economies. The aim of this paper is to offer a comparative analysis of economic institutions and their alterations after the Asian financial crisis. The paper includes Taiwan, Japan and South Korea in the analysis. The paper seeks to define the peculiar features of Taiwanese economic institutions in contrast to Japan and South Korea. By doing so, the paper investigates different aspects of economic institutions in Japan, Taiwan and South Korea: firm structure, the ability of firms to shape and organize regional supply chains, the role of state and trade unions, the composition of GDP/GNP, economic openness (trade, exchange regimes) and financial sectors’ capability to channel funds and encourage saving and investments. One of the findings of the paper is that Taiwan’s defining feature is its very close cooperation with Mainland China. However, the deep interconnectedness of the two economies, often called “Chiwan”, is going to be changed. The reason for this is not only a new economic policy, Taiwan’s “New Southbound Policy” of enhanced cooperation with countries of the Southeast Asia, South Asia and Oceania, but the upgrading of the Chinese economy, which is losing its place in the global supply chains as a cheap-labour country.http://icaps.nsysu.edu.tw/var/file/131/1131/img/2374/CCPS3(1)-Moldicz.pdfChinaTaiwanEuropeeconomic structureinstitutions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author István Csaba Moldicz
spellingShingle István Csaba Moldicz
Differences in East Asian Economic Institutions: Taiwan in a Regional Comparison
Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal
China
Taiwan
Europe
economic structure
institutions
author_facet István Csaba Moldicz
author_sort István Csaba Moldicz
title Differences in East Asian Economic Institutions: Taiwan in a Regional Comparison
title_short Differences in East Asian Economic Institutions: Taiwan in a Regional Comparison
title_full Differences in East Asian Economic Institutions: Taiwan in a Regional Comparison
title_fullStr Differences in East Asian Economic Institutions: Taiwan in a Regional Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Differences in East Asian Economic Institutions: Taiwan in a Regional Comparison
title_sort differences in east asian economic institutions: taiwan in a regional comparison
publisher National Sun Yat-sen University
series Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal
issn 2410-9681
2410-9681
publishDate 2017-05-01
description The term “developmental state” describes a very conscious, however, more or less market-friendly approach to economic development. The developmental states of the East Asian region can be characterized by a strong emphasis on diverse forms of state intervention generally; however, these sets of institutions differ in the Japanese, Taiwanese, and South Korean economies. The aim of this paper is to offer a comparative analysis of economic institutions and their alterations after the Asian financial crisis. The paper includes Taiwan, Japan and South Korea in the analysis. The paper seeks to define the peculiar features of Taiwanese economic institutions in contrast to Japan and South Korea. By doing so, the paper investigates different aspects of economic institutions in Japan, Taiwan and South Korea: firm structure, the ability of firms to shape and organize regional supply chains, the role of state and trade unions, the composition of GDP/GNP, economic openness (trade, exchange regimes) and financial sectors’ capability to channel funds and encourage saving and investments. One of the findings of the paper is that Taiwan’s defining feature is its very close cooperation with Mainland China. However, the deep interconnectedness of the two economies, often called “Chiwan”, is going to be changed. The reason for this is not only a new economic policy, Taiwan’s “New Southbound Policy” of enhanced cooperation with countries of the Southeast Asia, South Asia and Oceania, but the upgrading of the Chinese economy, which is losing its place in the global supply chains as a cheap-labour country.
topic China
Taiwan
Europe
economic structure
institutions
url http://icaps.nsysu.edu.tw/var/file/131/1131/img/2374/CCPS3(1)-Moldicz.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT istvancsabamoldicz differencesineastasianeconomicinstitutionstaiwaninaregionalcomparison
_version_ 1725403358706008064