Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa
When performing research at a reactor facility, experimenters often need to determine the neutron fluence achieved during an operation. Facilities typically provide guidance in the form of neutron fluence per megajoule (MJ) or through passive dosimetry results. After experiment completion, there is...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2016-01-01
|
Series: | EPJ Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201610605001 |
id |
doaj-5d1fb7c69a6b4cc598703a00a9aa4bb9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5d1fb7c69a6b4cc598703a00a9aa4bb92021-08-02T07:00:24ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2016-01-011060500110.1051/epjconf/201610605001epjconf-ISRD2015_05001Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR ExperimentersaCoburn Jonathan0Luker S. Michael1Parma Edward J.2DePriest K. Russell3Graduate Student Intern (North Carolina State University), Applied Nuclear Technologies, Sandia National LaboratoriesSenior R&D Scientist/Engineer, Applied Nuclear Technologies, Sandia National LaboratoriesPrincipal R&D Scientist/Engineer, Applied Nuclear Technologies, Sandia National LaboratoriesPrincipal R&D Scientist/Engineer, Applied Nuclear Technologies, Sandia National LaboratoriesWhen performing research at a reactor facility, experimenters often need to determine the neutron fluence achieved during an operation. Facilities typically provide guidance in the form of neutron fluence per megajoule (MJ) or through passive dosimetry results. After experiment completion, there is sometimes a delay of several days (or weeks) before the passive dosimetry results are available. In the interim, an experimenter does not have confirmation that the desired irradiation levels were reached. Active dosimetry may provide an estimate of neutron fluxes, but few active detectors are available that have been calibrated to measure neutron fluxes obtained inside the Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) central cavity environment. For past experiments at the ACRR, the neutron fluence was calculated by integrating the response of a fission chamber rate detection signal and then normalizing this integral to fluence determined from passive dosimetry. An alternative method of directly measuring neutron flux is desired; the new methodology described provides a complete neutron flux profile after a reactor pulse, utilizing fission chamber physics in combination with a compensating ion chamber to extract and convert a current signal to neutron flux as a function of time.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201610605001 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Coburn Jonathan Luker S. Michael Parma Edward J. DePriest K. Russell |
spellingShingle |
Coburn Jonathan Luker S. Michael Parma Edward J. DePriest K. Russell Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa EPJ Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Coburn Jonathan Luker S. Michael Parma Edward J. DePriest K. Russell |
author_sort |
Coburn Jonathan |
title |
Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa |
title_short |
Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa |
title_full |
Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa |
title_fullStr |
Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa |
title_sort |
modeling, calibration, and verification of a fission chamber for acrr experimentersa |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
EPJ Web of Conferences |
issn |
2100-014X |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
When performing research at a reactor facility, experimenters often need to determine the neutron fluence achieved during an operation. Facilities typically provide guidance in the form of neutron fluence per megajoule (MJ) or through passive dosimetry results. After experiment completion, there is sometimes a delay of several days (or weeks) before the passive dosimetry results are available. In the interim, an experimenter does not have confirmation that the desired irradiation levels were reached. Active dosimetry may provide an estimate of neutron fluxes, but few active detectors are available that have been calibrated to measure neutron fluxes obtained inside the Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) central cavity environment. For past experiments at the ACRR, the neutron fluence was calculated by integrating the response of a fission chamber rate detection signal and then normalizing this integral to fluence determined from passive dosimetry. An alternative method of directly measuring neutron flux is desired; the new methodology described provides a complete neutron flux profile after a reactor pulse, utilizing fission chamber physics in combination with a compensating ion chamber to extract and convert a current signal to neutron flux as a function of time. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201610605001 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT coburnjonathan modelingcalibrationandverificationofafissionchamberforacrrexperimentersa AT lukersmichael modelingcalibrationandverificationofafissionchamberforacrrexperimentersa AT parmaedwardj modelingcalibrationandverificationofafissionchamberforacrrexperimentersa AT depriestkrussell modelingcalibrationandverificationofafissionchamberforacrrexperimentersa |
_version_ |
1721239679802540032 |