Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa

When performing research at a reactor facility, experimenters often need to determine the neutron fluence achieved during an operation. Facilities typically provide guidance in the form of neutron fluence per megajoule (MJ) or through passive dosimetry results. After experiment completion, there is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Coburn Jonathan, Luker S. Michael, Parma Edward J., DePriest K. Russell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2016-01-01
Series:EPJ Web of Conferences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201610605001
id doaj-5d1fb7c69a6b4cc598703a00a9aa4bb9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5d1fb7c69a6b4cc598703a00a9aa4bb92021-08-02T07:00:24ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2016-01-011060500110.1051/epjconf/201610605001epjconf-ISRD2015_05001Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR ExperimentersaCoburn Jonathan0Luker S. Michael1Parma Edward J.2DePriest K. Russell3Graduate Student Intern (North Carolina State University), Applied Nuclear Technologies, Sandia National LaboratoriesSenior R&D Scientist/Engineer, Applied Nuclear Technologies, Sandia National LaboratoriesPrincipal R&D Scientist/Engineer, Applied Nuclear Technologies, Sandia National LaboratoriesPrincipal R&D Scientist/Engineer, Applied Nuclear Technologies, Sandia National LaboratoriesWhen performing research at a reactor facility, experimenters often need to determine the neutron fluence achieved during an operation. Facilities typically provide guidance in the form of neutron fluence per megajoule (MJ) or through passive dosimetry results. After experiment completion, there is sometimes a delay of several days (or weeks) before the passive dosimetry results are available. In the interim, an experimenter does not have confirmation that the desired irradiation levels were reached. Active dosimetry may provide an estimate of neutron fluxes, but few active detectors are available that have been calibrated to measure neutron fluxes obtained inside the Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) central cavity environment. For past experiments at the ACRR, the neutron fluence was calculated by integrating the response of a fission chamber rate detection signal and then normalizing this integral to fluence determined from passive dosimetry. An alternative method of directly measuring neutron flux is desired; the new methodology described provides a complete neutron flux profile after a reactor pulse, utilizing fission chamber physics in combination with a compensating ion chamber to extract and convert a current signal to neutron flux as a function of time.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201610605001
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Coburn Jonathan
Luker S. Michael
Parma Edward J.
DePriest K. Russell
spellingShingle Coburn Jonathan
Luker S. Michael
Parma Edward J.
DePriest K. Russell
Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa
EPJ Web of Conferences
author_facet Coburn Jonathan
Luker S. Michael
Parma Edward J.
DePriest K. Russell
author_sort Coburn Jonathan
title Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa
title_short Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa
title_full Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa
title_fullStr Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa
title_full_unstemmed Modeling, Calibration, and Verification of a Fission Chamber for ACRR Experimentersa
title_sort modeling, calibration, and verification of a fission chamber for acrr experimentersa
publisher EDP Sciences
series EPJ Web of Conferences
issn 2100-014X
publishDate 2016-01-01
description When performing research at a reactor facility, experimenters often need to determine the neutron fluence achieved during an operation. Facilities typically provide guidance in the form of neutron fluence per megajoule (MJ) or through passive dosimetry results. After experiment completion, there is sometimes a delay of several days (or weeks) before the passive dosimetry results are available. In the interim, an experimenter does not have confirmation that the desired irradiation levels were reached. Active dosimetry may provide an estimate of neutron fluxes, but few active detectors are available that have been calibrated to measure neutron fluxes obtained inside the Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) central cavity environment. For past experiments at the ACRR, the neutron fluence was calculated by integrating the response of a fission chamber rate detection signal and then normalizing this integral to fluence determined from passive dosimetry. An alternative method of directly measuring neutron flux is desired; the new methodology described provides a complete neutron flux profile after a reactor pulse, utilizing fission chamber physics in combination with a compensating ion chamber to extract and convert a current signal to neutron flux as a function of time.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201610605001
work_keys_str_mv AT coburnjonathan modelingcalibrationandverificationofafissionchamberforacrrexperimentersa
AT lukersmichael modelingcalibrationandverificationofafissionchamberforacrrexperimentersa
AT parmaedwardj modelingcalibrationandverificationofafissionchamberforacrrexperimentersa
AT depriestkrussell modelingcalibrationandverificationofafissionchamberforacrrexperimentersa
_version_ 1721239679802540032