Does catch-and-release angling pose a threat to American eel? A hooking mortality experiment

Incidental capture of protected fishes usually calls for immediate release, however, post-release survival has not been investigated for many protected species. The American eel Anguilla rostrata is an example of an imperiled species that is incidentally captured by recreational anglers, but for whi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Litt, MA, Etherington, BS, Gutowsky, LFG, Lapointe, NWR, Cooke, SJ
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Inter-Research 2020-01-01
Series:Endangered Species Research
Online Access:https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v41/p1-6/
id doaj-5d19748900864517822e1d78da38dbbf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5d19748900864517822e1d78da38dbbf2020-11-25T04:08:20ZengInter-ResearchEndangered Species Research1863-54071613-47962020-01-01411610.3354/esr01002Does catch-and-release angling pose a threat to American eel? A hooking mortality experimentLitt, MAEtherington, BSGutowsky, LFGLapointe, NWRCooke, SJIncidental capture of protected fishes usually calls for immediate release, however, post-release survival has not been investigated for many protected species. The American eel Anguilla rostrata is an example of an imperiled species that is incidentally captured by recreational anglers, but for which the impacts of catch and release are unknown. In this study, we examined the short-term (7 d) mortality and injury of American eels (n = 207) following simulated catch-and-release scenarios (involving manually embedded hooks) in a controlled experiment. Specifically, we compared the effects of cutting the line versus removing the hook, as well as shallow versus deep hooking, in holding tanks. No mortalities occurred in any of the groups during a 7 d monitoring period, and most eels exhibited little to mild injury. A high degree of hook shedding occurred in groups where the hook was shallowly embedded. Hooking depth was significantly related to hook-shedding rate, with 93.7% of hooks shed in the shallow-hook-line-cut group compared to 71.8% of hooks shed in the deep-hook-line-cut group. Our results suggest that recreationally captured American eels may be relatively resilient to catch and release, but validation of these results in a field setting is recommended.https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v41/p1-6/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Litt, MA
Etherington, BS
Gutowsky, LFG
Lapointe, NWR
Cooke, SJ
spellingShingle Litt, MA
Etherington, BS
Gutowsky, LFG
Lapointe, NWR
Cooke, SJ
Does catch-and-release angling pose a threat to American eel? A hooking mortality experiment
Endangered Species Research
author_facet Litt, MA
Etherington, BS
Gutowsky, LFG
Lapointe, NWR
Cooke, SJ
author_sort Litt, MA
title Does catch-and-release angling pose a threat to American eel? A hooking mortality experiment
title_short Does catch-and-release angling pose a threat to American eel? A hooking mortality experiment
title_full Does catch-and-release angling pose a threat to American eel? A hooking mortality experiment
title_fullStr Does catch-and-release angling pose a threat to American eel? A hooking mortality experiment
title_full_unstemmed Does catch-and-release angling pose a threat to American eel? A hooking mortality experiment
title_sort does catch-and-release angling pose a threat to american eel? a hooking mortality experiment
publisher Inter-Research
series Endangered Species Research
issn 1863-5407
1613-4796
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Incidental capture of protected fishes usually calls for immediate release, however, post-release survival has not been investigated for many protected species. The American eel Anguilla rostrata is an example of an imperiled species that is incidentally captured by recreational anglers, but for which the impacts of catch and release are unknown. In this study, we examined the short-term (7 d) mortality and injury of American eels (n = 207) following simulated catch-and-release scenarios (involving manually embedded hooks) in a controlled experiment. Specifically, we compared the effects of cutting the line versus removing the hook, as well as shallow versus deep hooking, in holding tanks. No mortalities occurred in any of the groups during a 7 d monitoring period, and most eels exhibited little to mild injury. A high degree of hook shedding occurred in groups where the hook was shallowly embedded. Hooking depth was significantly related to hook-shedding rate, with 93.7% of hooks shed in the shallow-hook-line-cut group compared to 71.8% of hooks shed in the deep-hook-line-cut group. Our results suggest that recreationally captured American eels may be relatively resilient to catch and release, but validation of these results in a field setting is recommended.
url https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esr/v41/p1-6/
work_keys_str_mv AT littma doescatchandreleaseanglingposeathreattoamericaneelahookingmortalityexperiment
AT etheringtonbs doescatchandreleaseanglingposeathreattoamericaneelahookingmortalityexperiment
AT gutowskylfg doescatchandreleaseanglingposeathreattoamericaneelahookingmortalityexperiment
AT lapointenwr doescatchandreleaseanglingposeathreattoamericaneelahookingmortalityexperiment
AT cookesj doescatchandreleaseanglingposeathreattoamericaneelahookingmortalityexperiment
_version_ 1724426301676191744