Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process: A State “Scope of Practice” Perspective

Objective: Explore the intersection of the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process (PPCP) and state laws in order to identify laws that may impede the delivery of optimal patient care. Summary: A review of the PPCP identified six areas in which state laws can limit full pharmacist engagement: 1) order...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alex Adams, Krystalyn Weaver
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2019-05-01
Series:INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/1389
id doaj-5cf323bb04b346bcb11820bfe2f3ca2c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5cf323bb04b346bcb11820bfe2f3ca2c2020-11-25T03:03:50ZengUniversity of Minnesota Libraries PublishingINNOVATIONS in Pharmacy2155-04172019-05-0110210.24926/iip.v10i2.1389Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process: A State “Scope of Practice” PerspectiveAlex Adams0Krystalyn Weaver1Idaho State Board of PharmacyNational Alliance of State Pharmacy Associations Objective: Explore the intersection of the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process (PPCP) and state laws in order to identify laws that may impede the delivery of optimal patient care. Summary: A review of the PPCP identified six areas in which state laws can limit full pharmacist engagement: 1) ordering and interpreting laboratory tests; 2) participating in a collaborative practice agreement; 3) independently prescribing certain medications; 4) independently adapting medications; 5) administering medications; and 6) effective delegation. A framework is put forth to organize how these scope of practice matters are interrelated. Conclusion: For pharmacists to fully engage in the PPCP, state laws must enable full participation. By unleashing pharmacists to fully engage in the process, patient care delivery and outcomes can be improved, and total health care costs can be reduced.   Article Type: Commentary https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/1389Pharmacists’ Patient Care ProcessScope of PracticePharmacist Prescriptive AuthorityCollaborative Practice Agreement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alex Adams
Krystalyn Weaver
spellingShingle Alex Adams
Krystalyn Weaver
Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process: A State “Scope of Practice” Perspective
INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process
Scope of Practice
Pharmacist Prescriptive Authority
Collaborative Practice Agreement
author_facet Alex Adams
Krystalyn Weaver
author_sort Alex Adams
title Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process: A State “Scope of Practice” Perspective
title_short Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process: A State “Scope of Practice” Perspective
title_full Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process: A State “Scope of Practice” Perspective
title_fullStr Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process: A State “Scope of Practice” Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process: A State “Scope of Practice” Perspective
title_sort pharmacists’ patient care process: a state “scope of practice” perspective
publisher University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
series INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy
issn 2155-0417
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Objective: Explore the intersection of the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process (PPCP) and state laws in order to identify laws that may impede the delivery of optimal patient care. Summary: A review of the PPCP identified six areas in which state laws can limit full pharmacist engagement: 1) ordering and interpreting laboratory tests; 2) participating in a collaborative practice agreement; 3) independently prescribing certain medications; 4) independently adapting medications; 5) administering medications; and 6) effective delegation. A framework is put forth to organize how these scope of practice matters are interrelated. Conclusion: For pharmacists to fully engage in the PPCP, state laws must enable full participation. By unleashing pharmacists to fully engage in the process, patient care delivery and outcomes can be improved, and total health care costs can be reduced.   Article Type: Commentary
topic Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process
Scope of Practice
Pharmacist Prescriptive Authority
Collaborative Practice Agreement
url https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/1389
work_keys_str_mv AT alexadams pharmacistspatientcareprocessastatescopeofpracticeperspective
AT krystalynweaver pharmacistspatientcareprocessastatescopeofpracticeperspective
_version_ 1724684329896902656