Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
PurposeFor resectable cases of stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the best treatment after surgery is still uncertain. The effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is controversial. Thus, we performed this updated meta-analysis to reassess the data of PORT in stage III-N2 NSCLC pati...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.680615/full |
id |
doaj-5cd3c3cf215544aa8104af559aa92d16 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5cd3c3cf215544aa8104af559aa92d162021-07-15T13:55:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2021-07-011110.3389/fonc.2021.680615680615Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisTianyu LeiJing LiHao ZhongHuibo ZhangYan JinJie WuLan LiBin XuQibin SongQinyong HuPurposeFor resectable cases of stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the best treatment after surgery is still uncertain. The effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is controversial. Thus, we performed this updated meta-analysis to reassess the data of PORT in stage III-N2 NSCLC patients, to figure out whether these patients can benefit from PORT.MethodsWe conducted searches of the published literature in EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for relevant randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing PORT group with the non-PORT group in NSCLC patients at stage III-N2. These studies allowed the prior chemotherapy in the treatment. We extracted the data from these articles and used the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as summary statistics for estimating the effect of PORT on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS).ResultThe analyses of seven randomized controlled trials (1,318 participants) show no benefit of PORT on survival (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.07; p = 0.18) but a significantly different effect of PORT on DFS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.97; p = 0.02) and LRFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.81; p = 0.0003). There is not enough evidence of a difference in the effect on survival by the utility of chemotherapy along with PORT though subgroup analysis of no chemotherapy group, concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential chemoradiotherapy group. Even in trials with 3D-CRT radiation technique, the pooled analysis shows no benefit of PORT on survival in patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC (data is not shown).ConclusionOur findings illustrate that in the postoperative treatment for patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC, PORT contributes to a significantly increased DFS and LR and may not associate with an improved OS, indicating a cautious selection.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.680615/fullnon-small cell lung cancerpostoperative radiotherapysurgerychemotherapystage III-N2 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tianyu Lei Jing Li Hao Zhong Huibo Zhang Yan Jin Jie Wu Lan Li Bin Xu Qibin Song Qinyong Hu |
spellingShingle |
Tianyu Lei Jing Li Hao Zhong Huibo Zhang Yan Jin Jie Wu Lan Li Bin Xu Qibin Song Qinyong Hu Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Frontiers in Oncology non-small cell lung cancer postoperative radiotherapy surgery chemotherapy stage III-N2 |
author_facet |
Tianyu Lei Jing Li Hao Zhong Huibo Zhang Yan Jin Jie Wu Lan Li Bin Xu Qibin Song Qinyong Hu |
author_sort |
Tianyu Lei |
title |
Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short |
Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
postoperative radiotherapy for patients with resectable stage iii-n2 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Oncology |
issn |
2234-943X |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
PurposeFor resectable cases of stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the best treatment after surgery is still uncertain. The effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is controversial. Thus, we performed this updated meta-analysis to reassess the data of PORT in stage III-N2 NSCLC patients, to figure out whether these patients can benefit from PORT.MethodsWe conducted searches of the published literature in EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for relevant randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing PORT group with the non-PORT group in NSCLC patients at stage III-N2. These studies allowed the prior chemotherapy in the treatment. We extracted the data from these articles and used the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as summary statistics for estimating the effect of PORT on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS).ResultThe analyses of seven randomized controlled trials (1,318 participants) show no benefit of PORT on survival (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.07; p = 0.18) but a significantly different effect of PORT on DFS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.97; p = 0.02) and LRFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.81; p = 0.0003). There is not enough evidence of a difference in the effect on survival by the utility of chemotherapy along with PORT though subgroup analysis of no chemotherapy group, concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential chemoradiotherapy group. Even in trials with 3D-CRT radiation technique, the pooled analysis shows no benefit of PORT on survival in patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC (data is not shown).ConclusionOur findings illustrate that in the postoperative treatment for patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC, PORT contributes to a significantly increased DFS and LR and may not associate with an improved OS, indicating a cautious selection. |
topic |
non-small cell lung cancer postoperative radiotherapy surgery chemotherapy stage III-N2 |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.680615/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tianyulei postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jingli postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haozhong postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT huibozhang postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yanjin postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiewu postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lanli postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT binxu postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qibinsong postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qinyonghu postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1721300560484761600 |