Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PurposeFor resectable cases of stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the best treatment after surgery is still uncertain. The effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is controversial. Thus, we performed this updated meta-analysis to reassess the data of PORT in stage III-N2 NSCLC pati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tianyu Lei, Jing Li, Hao Zhong, Huibo Zhang, Yan Jin, Jie Wu, Lan Li, Bin Xu, Qibin Song, Qinyong Hu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.680615/full
id doaj-5cd3c3cf215544aa8104af559aa92d16
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5cd3c3cf215544aa8104af559aa92d162021-07-15T13:55:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2021-07-011110.3389/fonc.2021.680615680615Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisTianyu LeiJing LiHao ZhongHuibo ZhangYan JinJie WuLan LiBin XuQibin SongQinyong HuPurposeFor resectable cases of stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the best treatment after surgery is still uncertain. The effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is controversial. Thus, we performed this updated meta-analysis to reassess the data of PORT in stage III-N2 NSCLC patients, to figure out whether these patients can benefit from PORT.MethodsWe conducted searches of the published literature in EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for relevant randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing PORT group with the non-PORT group in NSCLC patients at stage III-N2. These studies allowed the prior chemotherapy in the treatment. We extracted the data from these articles and used the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as summary statistics for estimating the effect of PORT on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS).ResultThe analyses of seven randomized controlled trials (1,318 participants) show no benefit of PORT on survival (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.07; p = 0.18) but a significantly different effect of PORT on DFS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.97; p = 0.02) and LRFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.81; p = 0.0003). There is not enough evidence of a difference in the effect on survival by the utility of chemotherapy along with PORT though subgroup analysis of no chemotherapy group, concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential chemoradiotherapy group. Even in trials with 3D-CRT radiation technique, the pooled analysis shows no benefit of PORT on survival in patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC (data is not shown).ConclusionOur findings illustrate that in the postoperative treatment for patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC, PORT contributes to a significantly increased DFS and LR and may not associate with an improved OS, indicating a cautious selection.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.680615/fullnon-small cell lung cancerpostoperative radiotherapysurgerychemotherapystage III-N2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tianyu Lei
Jing Li
Hao Zhong
Huibo Zhang
Yan Jin
Jie Wu
Lan Li
Bin Xu
Qibin Song
Qinyong Hu
spellingShingle Tianyu Lei
Jing Li
Hao Zhong
Huibo Zhang
Yan Jin
Jie Wu
Lan Li
Bin Xu
Qibin Song
Qinyong Hu
Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Frontiers in Oncology
non-small cell lung cancer
postoperative radiotherapy
surgery
chemotherapy
stage III-N2
author_facet Tianyu Lei
Jing Li
Hao Zhong
Huibo Zhang
Yan Jin
Jie Wu
Lan Li
Bin Xu
Qibin Song
Qinyong Hu
author_sort Tianyu Lei
title Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients With Resectable Stage III-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort postoperative radiotherapy for patients with resectable stage iii-n2 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2021-07-01
description PurposeFor resectable cases of stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the best treatment after surgery is still uncertain. The effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is controversial. Thus, we performed this updated meta-analysis to reassess the data of PORT in stage III-N2 NSCLC patients, to figure out whether these patients can benefit from PORT.MethodsWe conducted searches of the published literature in EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for relevant randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing PORT group with the non-PORT group in NSCLC patients at stage III-N2. These studies allowed the prior chemotherapy in the treatment. We extracted the data from these articles and used the hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as summary statistics for estimating the effect of PORT on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS).ResultThe analyses of seven randomized controlled trials (1,318 participants) show no benefit of PORT on survival (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.07; p = 0.18) but a significantly different effect of PORT on DFS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.97; p = 0.02) and LRFS (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.81; p = 0.0003). There is not enough evidence of a difference in the effect on survival by the utility of chemotherapy along with PORT though subgroup analysis of no chemotherapy group, concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential chemoradiotherapy group. Even in trials with 3D-CRT radiation technique, the pooled analysis shows no benefit of PORT on survival in patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC (data is not shown).ConclusionOur findings illustrate that in the postoperative treatment for patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC, PORT contributes to a significantly increased DFS and LR and may not associate with an improved OS, indicating a cautious selection.
topic non-small cell lung cancer
postoperative radiotherapy
surgery
chemotherapy
stage III-N2
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.680615/full
work_keys_str_mv AT tianyulei postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jingli postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haozhong postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huibozhang postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanjin postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiewu postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lanli postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT binxu postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qibinsong postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qinyonghu postoperativeradiotherapyforpatientswithresectablestageiiin2nonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1721300560484761600