The influence of an applied standard test method on a measurement of concrete stabilized secant modulus of elasticity

The paper focuses on the influence of the standard test method applied to determine the concrete stabilized secant modulus on a specified value. The new European Standard EN 12390-13 for testing hardened concrete accepts two methods (A and B) for the determination of the secant modulus of elasticity...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Domagała Lucyna, Dobrowolska Justyna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816307001
id doaj-5cce098cc6884253bc1ea7bb3ebc1403
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5cce098cc6884253bc1ea7bb3ebc14032021-02-02T04:13:10ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-011630700110.1051/matecconf/201816307001matecconf_matbud2018_07001The influence of an applied standard test method on a measurement of concrete stabilized secant modulus of elasticityDomagała LucynaDobrowolska JustynaThe paper focuses on the influence of the standard test method applied to determine the concrete stabilized secant modulus on a specified value. The new European Standard EN 12390-13 for testing hardened concrete accepts two methods (A and B) for the determination of the secant modulus of elasticity in compression. The aim of the research was to establish how different testing procedures affect a measured value of modulus of elasticity. Four structural concrete series: two lightweight aggregate concretes and two normal-weight ones were subject to tests of moduli of elasticity determined by both standard methods, as well as compressive strength and density. The carried out tests revealed that the procedure of testing modulus of elasticity influenced a measured value. Method A led to higher values of modulus in relation to Method B, irrespective of concrete density and strength. Nevertheless, a certain relationship between the concrete structure homogeneity and the difference in results of moduli determined by both methods may be observed.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816307001
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Domagała Lucyna
Dobrowolska Justyna
spellingShingle Domagała Lucyna
Dobrowolska Justyna
The influence of an applied standard test method on a measurement of concrete stabilized secant modulus of elasticity
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Domagała Lucyna
Dobrowolska Justyna
author_sort Domagała Lucyna
title The influence of an applied standard test method on a measurement of concrete stabilized secant modulus of elasticity
title_short The influence of an applied standard test method on a measurement of concrete stabilized secant modulus of elasticity
title_full The influence of an applied standard test method on a measurement of concrete stabilized secant modulus of elasticity
title_fullStr The influence of an applied standard test method on a measurement of concrete stabilized secant modulus of elasticity
title_full_unstemmed The influence of an applied standard test method on a measurement of concrete stabilized secant modulus of elasticity
title_sort influence of an applied standard test method on a measurement of concrete stabilized secant modulus of elasticity
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The paper focuses on the influence of the standard test method applied to determine the concrete stabilized secant modulus on a specified value. The new European Standard EN 12390-13 for testing hardened concrete accepts two methods (A and B) for the determination of the secant modulus of elasticity in compression. The aim of the research was to establish how different testing procedures affect a measured value of modulus of elasticity. Four structural concrete series: two lightweight aggregate concretes and two normal-weight ones were subject to tests of moduli of elasticity determined by both standard methods, as well as compressive strength and density. The carried out tests revealed that the procedure of testing modulus of elasticity influenced a measured value. Method A led to higher values of modulus in relation to Method B, irrespective of concrete density and strength. Nevertheless, a certain relationship between the concrete structure homogeneity and the difference in results of moduli determined by both methods may be observed.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816307001
work_keys_str_mv AT domagałalucyna theinfluenceofanappliedstandardtestmethodonameasurementofconcretestabilizedsecantmodulusofelasticity
AT dobrowolskajustyna theinfluenceofanappliedstandardtestmethodonameasurementofconcretestabilizedsecantmodulusofelasticity
AT domagałalucyna influenceofanappliedstandardtestmethodonameasurementofconcretestabilizedsecantmodulusofelasticity
AT dobrowolskajustyna influenceofanappliedstandardtestmethodonameasurementofconcretestabilizedsecantmodulusofelasticity
_version_ 1724306199415881728