Intersectionality in Finnish adult education research: insights from the journal Aikuiskasvatus 2010-2016

The article studies intersectionality in Finnish research on adult education. Specifically, we investigate the kinds of discussions on differences and their relations that are going on in such research. To this end we seek to identify intersectional approaches in the articles published in the journa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seija Keskitalo-Foley, Päivi Naskali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linköping University Electronic Press 2017-11-01
Series:European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9103
id doaj-5cc686dc8fb949beb2112f0542ce0eea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5cc686dc8fb949beb2112f0542ce0eea2020-11-24T23:49:52ZengLinköping University Electronic PressEuropean Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults2000-74262017-11-0191132710.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9103Intersectionality in Finnish adult education research: insights from the journal Aikuiskasvatus 2010-2016Seija Keskitalo-FoleyPäivi NaskaliThe article studies intersectionality in Finnish research on adult education. Specifically, we investigate the kinds of discussions on differences and their relations that are going on in such research. To this end we seek to identify intersectional approaches in the articles published in the journal Aikuiskasvatus between 2010 and 2016, a period marked by an increase in multiculturalism and social division as well as in gendered and sexual diversity in Finnish society. We understand intersectional differences as performative processes, not stable essences. Our study indicates that only few articles analysed intersectional differences explicitly. Implicitly recognised differences were mostly seen as givens. Categories such as ethnicity and race were found to be lacking in the data, but age, gender, social class, education, occupation and learning difficulties were discussed.http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9103Intersectional differencescategorisationadult educationdiscursive readingFinland
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Seija Keskitalo-Foley
Päivi Naskali
spellingShingle Seija Keskitalo-Foley
Päivi Naskali
Intersectionality in Finnish adult education research: insights from the journal Aikuiskasvatus 2010-2016
European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults
Intersectional differences
categorisation
adult education
discursive reading
Finland
author_facet Seija Keskitalo-Foley
Päivi Naskali
author_sort Seija Keskitalo-Foley
title Intersectionality in Finnish adult education research: insights from the journal Aikuiskasvatus 2010-2016
title_short Intersectionality in Finnish adult education research: insights from the journal Aikuiskasvatus 2010-2016
title_full Intersectionality in Finnish adult education research: insights from the journal Aikuiskasvatus 2010-2016
title_fullStr Intersectionality in Finnish adult education research: insights from the journal Aikuiskasvatus 2010-2016
title_full_unstemmed Intersectionality in Finnish adult education research: insights from the journal Aikuiskasvatus 2010-2016
title_sort intersectionality in finnish adult education research: insights from the journal aikuiskasvatus 2010-2016
publisher Linköping University Electronic Press
series European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults
issn 2000-7426
publishDate 2017-11-01
description The article studies intersectionality in Finnish research on adult education. Specifically, we investigate the kinds of discussions on differences and their relations that are going on in such research. To this end we seek to identify intersectional approaches in the articles published in the journal Aikuiskasvatus between 2010 and 2016, a period marked by an increase in multiculturalism and social division as well as in gendered and sexual diversity in Finnish society. We understand intersectional differences as performative processes, not stable essences. Our study indicates that only few articles analysed intersectional differences explicitly. Implicitly recognised differences were mostly seen as givens. Categories such as ethnicity and race were found to be lacking in the data, but age, gender, social class, education, occupation and learning difficulties were discussed.
topic Intersectional differences
categorisation
adult education
discursive reading
Finland
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela9103
work_keys_str_mv AT seijakeskitalofoley intersectionalityinfinnishadulteducationresearchinsightsfromthejournalaikuiskasvatus20102016
AT paivinaskali intersectionalityinfinnishadulteducationresearchinsightsfromthejournalaikuiskasvatus20102016
_version_ 1725481181512728576