Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise
The aim of the paper was to discuss the disadvantages of enterprises in dry areas compared to enterprises farming in similar production area outside a rain shadow. The analysis was based on the sample of 45 enterprises; twelve of which farming in the area of a rain shadow. In the first step, enterpr...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Mendel University Press
2013-01-01
|
Series: | Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://acta.mendelu.cz/61/2/0405/ |
id |
doaj-5cb9c894169e47ac8b31afca43bdfced |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5cb9c894169e47ac8b31afca43bdfced2020-11-24T23:41:27ZengMendel University PressActa Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis1211-85162464-83102013-01-0161240541010.11118/actaun201361020405Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterpriseMartin Maršík0Daniel Kopta1Department of Accounting and Finances, Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech RepublicDepartment of Accounting and Finances, Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech RepublicThe aim of the paper was to discuss the disadvantages of enterprises in dry areas compared to enterprises farming in similar production area outside a rain shadow. The analysis was based on the sample of 45 enterprises; twelve of which farming in the area of a rain shadow. In the first step, enterprises were sorted by the cluster analysis into groups farming in the same area, at a similar altitude, with the same structure in a similar manner, and under comparable financial conditions – (such as debt ratio, liquidity and activity ratio). The results of this step showed a different method of farming within enterprises in disadvantaged areas. Such enterprises have created two distinct, separate clusters differing from the average in the use of fixed assets, technical equipment of labour, labour productivity and income structure. In the second step, the way how the return on assets of such enterprises is different from the average profitability of the enterprise was assessed. Testing differences in mean values of profitability was performed using the Student t–test. Due to the high variability of the Return on assets (ROA), the difference between standard and disadvantaged enterprises has not been proved.https://acta.mendelu.cz/61/2/0405/financial analysisdry areasenterprise evaluationagriculture |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Martin Maršík Daniel Kopta |
spellingShingle |
Martin Maršík Daniel Kopta Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis financial analysis dry areas enterprise evaluation agriculture |
author_facet |
Martin Maršík Daniel Kopta |
author_sort |
Martin Maršík |
title |
Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise |
title_short |
Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise |
title_full |
Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise |
title_fullStr |
Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise |
title_sort |
use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise |
publisher |
Mendel University Press |
series |
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis |
issn |
1211-8516 2464-8310 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
The aim of the paper was to discuss the disadvantages of enterprises in dry areas compared to enterprises farming in similar production area outside a rain shadow. The analysis was based on the sample of 45 enterprises; twelve of which farming in the area of a rain shadow. In the first step, enterprises were sorted by the cluster analysis into groups farming in the same area, at a similar altitude, with the same structure in a similar manner, and under comparable financial conditions – (such as debt ratio, liquidity and activity ratio). The results of this step showed a different method of farming within enterprises in disadvantaged areas. Such enterprises have created two distinct, separate clusters differing from the average in the use of fixed assets, technical equipment of labour, labour productivity and income structure. In the second step, the way how the return on assets of such enterprises is different from the average profitability of the enterprise was assessed. Testing differences in mean values of profitability was performed using the Student t–test. Due to the high variability of the Return on assets (ROA), the difference between standard and disadvantaged enterprises has not been proved. |
topic |
financial analysis dry areas enterprise evaluation agriculture |
url |
https://acta.mendelu.cz/61/2/0405/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT martinmarsik useoftheclusteranalysisforassessmentofeconomicsituationofanenterprise AT danielkopta useoftheclusteranalysisforassessmentofeconomicsituationofanenterprise |
_version_ |
1725507174268928000 |