Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise

The aim of the paper was to discuss the disadvantages of enterprises in dry areas compared to enterprises farming in similar production area outside a rain shadow. The analysis was based on the sample of 45 enterprises; twelve of which farming in the area of a rain shadow. In the first step, enterpr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Maršík, Daniel Kopta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mendel University Press 2013-01-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://acta.mendelu.cz/61/2/0405/
id doaj-5cb9c894169e47ac8b31afca43bdfced
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5cb9c894169e47ac8b31afca43bdfced2020-11-24T23:41:27ZengMendel University PressActa Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis1211-85162464-83102013-01-0161240541010.11118/actaun201361020405Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterpriseMartin Maršík0Daniel Kopta1Department of Accounting and Finances, Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech RepublicDepartment of Accounting and Finances, Faculty of Economics, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech RepublicThe aim of the paper was to discuss the disadvantages of enterprises in dry areas compared to enterprises farming in similar production area outside a rain shadow. The analysis was based on the sample of 45 enterprises; twelve of which farming in the area of a rain shadow. In the first step, enterprises were sorted by the cluster analysis into groups farming in the same area, at a similar altitude, with the same structure in a similar manner, and under comparable financial conditions – (such as debt ratio, liquidity and activity ratio). The results of this step showed a different method of farming within enterprises in disadvantaged areas. Such enterprises have created two distinct, separate clusters differing from the average in the use of fixed assets, technical equipment of labour, labour productivity and income structure. In the second step, the way how the return on assets of such enterprises is different from the average profitability of the enterprise was assessed. Testing differences in mean values of profitability was performed using the Student t–test. Due to the high variability of the Return on assets (ROA), the difference between standard and disadvantaged enterprises has not been proved.https://acta.mendelu.cz/61/2/0405/financial analysisdry areasenterprise evaluationagriculture
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Maršík
Daniel Kopta
spellingShingle Martin Maršík
Daniel Kopta
Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
financial analysis
dry areas
enterprise evaluation
agriculture
author_facet Martin Maršík
Daniel Kopta
author_sort Martin Maršík
title Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise
title_short Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise
title_full Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise
title_fullStr Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise
title_full_unstemmed Use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise
title_sort use of the cluster analysis for assessment of economic situation of an enterprise
publisher Mendel University Press
series Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
issn 1211-8516
2464-8310
publishDate 2013-01-01
description The aim of the paper was to discuss the disadvantages of enterprises in dry areas compared to enterprises farming in similar production area outside a rain shadow. The analysis was based on the sample of 45 enterprises; twelve of which farming in the area of a rain shadow. In the first step, enterprises were sorted by the cluster analysis into groups farming in the same area, at a similar altitude, with the same structure in a similar manner, and under comparable financial conditions – (such as debt ratio, liquidity and activity ratio). The results of this step showed a different method of farming within enterprises in disadvantaged areas. Such enterprises have created two distinct, separate clusters differing from the average in the use of fixed assets, technical equipment of labour, labour productivity and income structure. In the second step, the way how the return on assets of such enterprises is different from the average profitability of the enterprise was assessed. Testing differences in mean values of profitability was performed using the Student t–test. Due to the high variability of the Return on assets (ROA), the difference between standard and disadvantaged enterprises has not been proved.
topic financial analysis
dry areas
enterprise evaluation
agriculture
url https://acta.mendelu.cz/61/2/0405/
work_keys_str_mv AT martinmarsik useoftheclusteranalysisforassessmentofeconomicsituationofanenterprise
AT danielkopta useoftheclusteranalysisforassessmentofeconomicsituationofanenterprise
_version_ 1725507174268928000