Statistical study of the proton isotropy boundary

Based on a large data set of polar NOAA-type satellite observations we studied the latitude-MLT shape of the 80keV proton isotropy boundary (IB) as a function of the solar wind parameters and magnetic activity. Using "snapshots" of isotropy boundaries near-simultaneously crossed at fou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. A. Lvova, V. A. Sergeev, G. R. Bagautdinova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2005-06-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/23/1311/2005/angeo-23-1311-2005.pdf
id doaj-5ca5af659a2148c8811cbc8d88fd5358
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ca5af659a2148c8811cbc8d88fd53582020-11-24T21:32:25ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762005-06-01231311131610.5194/angeo-23-1311-2005Statistical study of the proton isotropy boundaryE. A. Lvova0V. A. Sergeev1G. R. Bagautdinova2Institute of Physics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, RussiaInstitute of Physics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, RussiaInstitute of Physics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, RussiaBased on a large data set of polar NOAA-type satellite observations we studied the latitude-MLT shape of the 80keV proton isotropy boundary (IB) as a function of the solar wind parameters and magnetic activity. Using "snapshots" of isotropy boundaries near-simultaneously crossed at four points we found that its equatorward expansion, as well as its dawn-dusk shift, depends mostly on the <i>AE</i>-index and on the corrected <i>D<sub>st</sub></i>*, whereas the amplitude of the IB daily variation is mostly controlled by the solar wind dynamic pressure. Applying a nonlinear, multi-parametric, least-square regression procedure, the empirical relationship describing the IB latitude as a function of MLT and <i>AE</i>, Pd, <i>D<sub>st</sub></i>* parameters was obtained. Comparing it with the predictions from the Tsyganenko-2001 model we found a good agreement during the quiet time but some important differences during the disturbed periods. Interpretation of these results in terms of the properties of the magnetospheric configuration is briefly discussed.https://www.ann-geophys.net/23/1311/2005/angeo-23-1311-2005.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. A. Lvova
V. A. Sergeev
G. R. Bagautdinova
spellingShingle E. A. Lvova
V. A. Sergeev
G. R. Bagautdinova
Statistical study of the proton isotropy boundary
Annales Geophysicae
author_facet E. A. Lvova
V. A. Sergeev
G. R. Bagautdinova
author_sort E. A. Lvova
title Statistical study of the proton isotropy boundary
title_short Statistical study of the proton isotropy boundary
title_full Statistical study of the proton isotropy boundary
title_fullStr Statistical study of the proton isotropy boundary
title_full_unstemmed Statistical study of the proton isotropy boundary
title_sort statistical study of the proton isotropy boundary
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Annales Geophysicae
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
publishDate 2005-06-01
description Based on a large data set of polar NOAA-type satellite observations we studied the latitude-MLT shape of the 80keV proton isotropy boundary (IB) as a function of the solar wind parameters and magnetic activity. Using "snapshots" of isotropy boundaries near-simultaneously crossed at four points we found that its equatorward expansion, as well as its dawn-dusk shift, depends mostly on the <i>AE</i>-index and on the corrected <i>D<sub>st</sub></i>*, whereas the amplitude of the IB daily variation is mostly controlled by the solar wind dynamic pressure. Applying a nonlinear, multi-parametric, least-square regression procedure, the empirical relationship describing the IB latitude as a function of MLT and <i>AE</i>, Pd, <i>D<sub>st</sub></i>* parameters was obtained. Comparing it with the predictions from the Tsyganenko-2001 model we found a good agreement during the quiet time but some important differences during the disturbed periods. Interpretation of these results in terms of the properties of the magnetospheric configuration is briefly discussed.
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/23/1311/2005/angeo-23-1311-2005.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ealvova statisticalstudyoftheprotonisotropyboundary
AT vasergeev statisticalstudyoftheprotonisotropyboundary
AT grbagautdinova statisticalstudyoftheprotonisotropyboundary
_version_ 1725957748507541504