Online Cooperative Promotion and Cost Sharing Policy under Supply Chain Competition

This paper studies online cooperative promotion and cost sharing decisions in competing supply chains. We consider a model of one B2C e-commerce platform and two supply chains each consisting of a supplier and an online retailer. The problem is studied using a multistage game. Firstly, the e-commerc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erjiang E, Geng Peng, Xin Tian, Qinghong Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2016-01-01
Series:Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3619597
id doaj-5c9bfee3449e4b9c9ec2b0db883580bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c9bfee3449e4b9c9ec2b0db883580bc2020-11-24T21:45:51ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472016-01-01201610.1155/2016/36195973619597Online Cooperative Promotion and Cost Sharing Policy under Supply Chain CompetitionErjiang E0Geng Peng1Xin Tian2Qinghong Chen3School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, ChinaSchool of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, ChinaShanghai HEADING Information Engineering Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201112, ChinaThis paper studies online cooperative promotion and cost sharing decisions in competing supply chains. We consider a model of one B2C e-commerce platform and two supply chains each consisting of a supplier and an online retailer. The problem is studied using a multistage game. Firstly, the e-commerce platform carries out the cooperative promotion and sets the magnitude of markdown (the value of e-coupon). Secondly, each retailer and his supplier determine the fraction of promotional cost sharing when they have different bargaining power. Lastly, the retailers decide whether to participate in the cooperative promotion campaign. We show that the retailers are likely to participate in the promotion if consumers become more price-sensitive. However, it does not imply that the retailers can benefit from the price promotion; the promotion decision game resembles the classical prisoner’s dilemma game. The retailers and suppliers can benefit from the cooperative promotion by designing an appropriate cost sharing contract. For a supply chain, the bargaining power between supplier and retailer, consumer price sensitivity, and competition intensity affect the fraction of the promotional cost sharing. We also find that equilibrium value of e-coupon set by the e-commerce platform is not optimal for all the parties.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3619597
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erjiang E
Geng Peng
Xin Tian
Qinghong Chen
spellingShingle Erjiang E
Geng Peng
Xin Tian
Qinghong Chen
Online Cooperative Promotion and Cost Sharing Policy under Supply Chain Competition
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
author_facet Erjiang E
Geng Peng
Xin Tian
Qinghong Chen
author_sort Erjiang E
title Online Cooperative Promotion and Cost Sharing Policy under Supply Chain Competition
title_short Online Cooperative Promotion and Cost Sharing Policy under Supply Chain Competition
title_full Online Cooperative Promotion and Cost Sharing Policy under Supply Chain Competition
title_fullStr Online Cooperative Promotion and Cost Sharing Policy under Supply Chain Competition
title_full_unstemmed Online Cooperative Promotion and Cost Sharing Policy under Supply Chain Competition
title_sort online cooperative promotion and cost sharing policy under supply chain competition
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Mathematical Problems in Engineering
issn 1024-123X
1563-5147
publishDate 2016-01-01
description This paper studies online cooperative promotion and cost sharing decisions in competing supply chains. We consider a model of one B2C e-commerce platform and two supply chains each consisting of a supplier and an online retailer. The problem is studied using a multistage game. Firstly, the e-commerce platform carries out the cooperative promotion and sets the magnitude of markdown (the value of e-coupon). Secondly, each retailer and his supplier determine the fraction of promotional cost sharing when they have different bargaining power. Lastly, the retailers decide whether to participate in the cooperative promotion campaign. We show that the retailers are likely to participate in the promotion if consumers become more price-sensitive. However, it does not imply that the retailers can benefit from the price promotion; the promotion decision game resembles the classical prisoner’s dilemma game. The retailers and suppliers can benefit from the cooperative promotion by designing an appropriate cost sharing contract. For a supply chain, the bargaining power between supplier and retailer, consumer price sensitivity, and competition intensity affect the fraction of the promotional cost sharing. We also find that equilibrium value of e-coupon set by the e-commerce platform is not optimal for all the parties.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3619597
work_keys_str_mv AT erjiange onlinecooperativepromotionandcostsharingpolicyundersupplychaincompetition
AT gengpeng onlinecooperativepromotionandcostsharingpolicyundersupplychaincompetition
AT xintian onlinecooperativepromotionandcostsharingpolicyundersupplychaincompetition
AT qinghongchen onlinecooperativepromotionandcostsharingpolicyundersupplychaincompetition
_version_ 1725903791086108672