Effects of Goal Type and Reinforcement Type on Self-Reported Domain-Specific Walking Among Inactive Adults: 2×2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundWalkIT Arizona was a 2×2 factorial trial examining the effects of goal type (adaptive versus static) and reinforcement type (immediate versus delayed) to increase moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) among insufficiently active adults. The 12-month interven...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McEntee, Mindy L, Cantley, Alison, Foreman, Emily, Berardi, Vincent, Phillips, Christine B., Hurley, Jane C., Hovell, Melbourne F., Hooker, Steven, Adams, Marc A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2020-12-01
Series:JMIR Formative Research
Online Access:https://formative.jmir.org/2020/12/e19863
id doaj-5c9a5a31a6334c80bf0c5db193329c4a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c9a5a31a6334c80bf0c5db193329c4a2021-04-02T18:40:36ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Formative Research2561-326X2020-12-01412e1986310.2196/19863Effects of Goal Type and Reinforcement Type on Self-Reported Domain-Specific Walking Among Inactive Adults: 2×2 Factorial Randomized Controlled TrialMcEntee, Mindy LCantley, AlisonForeman, EmilyBerardi, VincentPhillips, Christine B.Hurley, Jane C.Hovell, Melbourne F.Hooker, StevenAdams, Marc A BackgroundWalkIT Arizona was a 2×2 factorial trial examining the effects of goal type (adaptive versus static) and reinforcement type (immediate versus delayed) to increase moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) among insufficiently active adults. The 12-month intervention combined mobile health (mHealth) technology with behavioral strategies to test scalable population-health approaches to increasing MVPA. Self-reported physical activity provided domain-specific information to help contextualize the intervention effects. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to report on the secondary outcomes of self-reported walking for transportation and leisure over the course of the 12-month WalkIT intervention. MethodsA total of 512 participants aged 19 to 60 years (n=330 [64.5%] women; n=425 [83%] Caucasian/white, n=96 [18.8%] Hispanic/Latinx) were randomized into interventions based on type of goals and reinforcements. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long form assessed walking for transportation and leisure at baseline, and at 6 months and 12 months of the intervention. Negative binomial hurdle models were used to examine the effects of goal and reinforcement type on (1) odds of reporting any (versus no) walking/week and (2) total reported minutes of walking/week, adjusted for neighborhood walkability and socioeconomic status. Separate analyses were conducted for transportation and leisure walking, using complete cases and multiple imputation. ResultsAll intervention groups reported increased walking at 12 months relative to baseline. Effects of the intervention differed by domain: a significant three-way goal by reinforcement by time interaction was observed for total minutes of leisure walking/week, whereas time was the only significant factor that contributed to transportation walking. A sensitivity analysis indicated minimal differences between complete case analysis and multiple imputation. ConclusionsThis study is the first to report differential effects of adaptive versus static goals for self-reported walking by domain. Results support the premise that individual-level PA interventions are domain- and context-specific and may be helpful in guiding further intervention refinement. Trial RegistrationPreregistered at clinicaltrials.gov: (NCT02717663) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02717663 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.1016/j.cct.2019.05.001https://formative.jmir.org/2020/12/e19863
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author McEntee, Mindy L
Cantley, Alison
Foreman, Emily
Berardi, Vincent
Phillips, Christine B.
Hurley, Jane C.
Hovell, Melbourne F.
Hooker, Steven
Adams, Marc A
spellingShingle McEntee, Mindy L
Cantley, Alison
Foreman, Emily
Berardi, Vincent
Phillips, Christine B.
Hurley, Jane C.
Hovell, Melbourne F.
Hooker, Steven
Adams, Marc A
Effects of Goal Type and Reinforcement Type on Self-Reported Domain-Specific Walking Among Inactive Adults: 2×2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial
JMIR Formative Research
author_facet McEntee, Mindy L
Cantley, Alison
Foreman, Emily
Berardi, Vincent
Phillips, Christine B.
Hurley, Jane C.
Hovell, Melbourne F.
Hooker, Steven
Adams, Marc A
author_sort McEntee, Mindy L
title Effects of Goal Type and Reinforcement Type on Self-Reported Domain-Specific Walking Among Inactive Adults: 2×2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Effects of Goal Type and Reinforcement Type on Self-Reported Domain-Specific Walking Among Inactive Adults: 2×2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Effects of Goal Type and Reinforcement Type on Self-Reported Domain-Specific Walking Among Inactive Adults: 2×2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Effects of Goal Type and Reinforcement Type on Self-Reported Domain-Specific Walking Among Inactive Adults: 2×2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Goal Type and Reinforcement Type on Self-Reported Domain-Specific Walking Among Inactive Adults: 2×2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effects of goal type and reinforcement type on self-reported domain-specific walking among inactive adults: 2×2 factorial randomized controlled trial
publisher JMIR Publications
series JMIR Formative Research
issn 2561-326X
publishDate 2020-12-01
description BackgroundWalkIT Arizona was a 2×2 factorial trial examining the effects of goal type (adaptive versus static) and reinforcement type (immediate versus delayed) to increase moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) among insufficiently active adults. The 12-month intervention combined mobile health (mHealth) technology with behavioral strategies to test scalable population-health approaches to increasing MVPA. Self-reported physical activity provided domain-specific information to help contextualize the intervention effects. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to report on the secondary outcomes of self-reported walking for transportation and leisure over the course of the 12-month WalkIT intervention. MethodsA total of 512 participants aged 19 to 60 years (n=330 [64.5%] women; n=425 [83%] Caucasian/white, n=96 [18.8%] Hispanic/Latinx) were randomized into interventions based on type of goals and reinforcements. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long form assessed walking for transportation and leisure at baseline, and at 6 months and 12 months of the intervention. Negative binomial hurdle models were used to examine the effects of goal and reinforcement type on (1) odds of reporting any (versus no) walking/week and (2) total reported minutes of walking/week, adjusted for neighborhood walkability and socioeconomic status. Separate analyses were conducted for transportation and leisure walking, using complete cases and multiple imputation. ResultsAll intervention groups reported increased walking at 12 months relative to baseline. Effects of the intervention differed by domain: a significant three-way goal by reinforcement by time interaction was observed for total minutes of leisure walking/week, whereas time was the only significant factor that contributed to transportation walking. A sensitivity analysis indicated minimal differences between complete case analysis and multiple imputation. ConclusionsThis study is the first to report differential effects of adaptive versus static goals for self-reported walking by domain. Results support the premise that individual-level PA interventions are domain- and context-specific and may be helpful in guiding further intervention refinement. Trial RegistrationPreregistered at clinicaltrials.gov: (NCT02717663) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02717663 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.1016/j.cct.2019.05.001
url https://formative.jmir.org/2020/12/e19863
work_keys_str_mv AT mcenteemindyl effectsofgoaltypeandreinforcementtypeonselfreporteddomainspecificwalkingamonginactiveadults22factorialrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cantleyalison effectsofgoaltypeandreinforcementtypeonselfreporteddomainspecificwalkingamonginactiveadults22factorialrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT foremanemily effectsofgoaltypeandreinforcementtypeonselfreporteddomainspecificwalkingamonginactiveadults22factorialrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT berardivincent effectsofgoaltypeandreinforcementtypeonselfreporteddomainspecificwalkingamonginactiveadults22factorialrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT phillipschristineb effectsofgoaltypeandreinforcementtypeonselfreporteddomainspecificwalkingamonginactiveadults22factorialrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hurleyjanec effectsofgoaltypeandreinforcementtypeonselfreporteddomainspecificwalkingamonginactiveadults22factorialrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hovellmelbournef effectsofgoaltypeandreinforcementtypeonselfreporteddomainspecificwalkingamonginactiveadults22factorialrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hookersteven effectsofgoaltypeandreinforcementtypeonselfreporteddomainspecificwalkingamonginactiveadults22factorialrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT adamsmarca effectsofgoaltypeandreinforcementtypeonselfreporteddomainspecificwalkingamonginactiveadults22factorialrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1721551265909964800