Comparing epidural and wound infiltration analgesia for total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled study

Background and Aims: Continuous wound infiltration (CWI) is emerging as an alternative to continuous epidural infusion (CEI). This study compared postoperative pain scores of CEI with CWI in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Methods: This prospective randomised controlled trial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pooja Lal Ammianickal, Chitra Rajeswari Thangaswamy, Hemavathi Balachander, Murali Subbaiah, N C Pankaj Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2018;volume=62;issue=10;spage=759;epage=764;aulast=Ammianickal
id doaj-5c9812c9476940c0929cdf9008525a43
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c9812c9476940c0929cdf9008525a432020-11-25T01:13:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Anaesthesia0019-50490976-28172018-01-01621075976410.4103/ija.IJA_124_18Comparing epidural and wound infiltration analgesia for total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled studyPooja Lal AmmianickalChitra Rajeswari ThangaswamyHemavathi BalachanderMurali SubbaiahN C Pankaj KumarBackground and Aims: Continuous wound infiltration (CWI) is emerging as an alternative to continuous epidural infusion (CEI). This study compared postoperative pain scores of CEI with CWI in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Methods: This prospective randomised controlled trial included 102 patients planned for TAH who were randomised into either Group E (CEI) or Group L (CWI). The catheter (epidural/wound infiltration) was inserted in Group E before induction) and Group L at the end of surgery. General anaesthesia was administered according to standard protocol. At the end of surgery, both groups received 10 mL bolus of 0.2% ropivacaine followed by infusion at 6 mL/h through the respective catheters. They also received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine. The primary outcome was the visual analogue score at rest (VASR) and at deep breathing (VASDB) post-operatively. Secondary outcomes were post-operative morphine consumption, side effects and patient satisfaction. Results: The mean VASR between two groups were comparable up to 8 h. Group E showed significantly reduced VASR compared to Group L at 12 h (2.32 ± 0.59 vs 2.62 ± 0.67, P = 0.019) and 24 h (2.30 ± 0.58 vs 2.62 ± 0.57, P = 0.006). Group E showed significantly reduced VASDB compared to Group L at 5 min and from 4 to 24 h. Total morphine consumption, side effects and patient satisfaction were comparable. Conclusion: We conclude that CEI is a superior analgesic technique compared to CWI in total abdominal hysterectomy in terms of reduced pain scores.http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2018;volume=62;issue=10;spage=759;epage=764;aulast=AmmianickalEpidural analgesiahysterectomyinfiltration anaesthesiapatient-controlled analgesia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pooja Lal Ammianickal
Chitra Rajeswari Thangaswamy
Hemavathi Balachander
Murali Subbaiah
N C Pankaj Kumar
spellingShingle Pooja Lal Ammianickal
Chitra Rajeswari Thangaswamy
Hemavathi Balachander
Murali Subbaiah
N C Pankaj Kumar
Comparing epidural and wound infiltration analgesia for total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled study
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
Epidural analgesia
hysterectomy
infiltration anaesthesia
patient-controlled analgesia
author_facet Pooja Lal Ammianickal
Chitra Rajeswari Thangaswamy
Hemavathi Balachander
Murali Subbaiah
N C Pankaj Kumar
author_sort Pooja Lal Ammianickal
title Comparing epidural and wound infiltration analgesia for total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled study
title_short Comparing epidural and wound infiltration analgesia for total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled study
title_full Comparing epidural and wound infiltration analgesia for total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled study
title_fullStr Comparing epidural and wound infiltration analgesia for total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing epidural and wound infiltration analgesia for total abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled study
title_sort comparing epidural and wound infiltration analgesia for total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised controlled study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
issn 0019-5049
0976-2817
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background and Aims: Continuous wound infiltration (CWI) is emerging as an alternative to continuous epidural infusion (CEI). This study compared postoperative pain scores of CEI with CWI in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Methods: This prospective randomised controlled trial included 102 patients planned for TAH who were randomised into either Group E (CEI) or Group L (CWI). The catheter (epidural/wound infiltration) was inserted in Group E before induction) and Group L at the end of surgery. General anaesthesia was administered according to standard protocol. At the end of surgery, both groups received 10 mL bolus of 0.2% ropivacaine followed by infusion at 6 mL/h through the respective catheters. They also received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine. The primary outcome was the visual analogue score at rest (VASR) and at deep breathing (VASDB) post-operatively. Secondary outcomes were post-operative morphine consumption, side effects and patient satisfaction. Results: The mean VASR between two groups were comparable up to 8 h. Group E showed significantly reduced VASR compared to Group L at 12 h (2.32 ± 0.59 vs 2.62 ± 0.67, P = 0.019) and 24 h (2.30 ± 0.58 vs 2.62 ± 0.57, P = 0.006). Group E showed significantly reduced VASDB compared to Group L at 5 min and from 4 to 24 h. Total morphine consumption, side effects and patient satisfaction were comparable. Conclusion: We conclude that CEI is a superior analgesic technique compared to CWI in total abdominal hysterectomy in terms of reduced pain scores.
topic Epidural analgesia
hysterectomy
infiltration anaesthesia
patient-controlled analgesia
url http://www.ijaweb.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5049;year=2018;volume=62;issue=10;spage=759;epage=764;aulast=Ammianickal
work_keys_str_mv AT poojalalammianickal comparingepiduralandwoundinfiltrationanalgesiafortotalabdominalhysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT chitrarajeswarithangaswamy comparingepiduralandwoundinfiltrationanalgesiafortotalabdominalhysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT hemavathibalachander comparingepiduralandwoundinfiltrationanalgesiafortotalabdominalhysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT muralisubbaiah comparingepiduralandwoundinfiltrationanalgesiafortotalabdominalhysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT ncpankajkumar comparingepiduralandwoundinfiltrationanalgesiafortotalabdominalhysterectomyarandomisedcontrolledstudy
_version_ 1725160407783440384