Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review
Adolescence, a period of physical, social, cognitive and emotional development, represents a target population for sexual health promotion and education when it comes to achieving the 2030 Agenda goals for sustainable and equitable societies. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of what i...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-03-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2555 |
id |
doaj-5c82996298b54912bc6982080e596e15 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5c82996298b54912bc6982080e596e152021-03-05T00:04:37ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-03-01182555255510.3390/ijerph18052555Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic ReviewMaría Lameiras-Fernández0Rosana Martínez-Román1María Victoria Carrera-Fernández2Yolanda Rodríguez-Castro3Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, SpainFaculty of Education and Social Work, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, SpainFaculty of Education and Social Work, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, SpainFaculty of Education and Social Work, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, SpainAdolescence, a period of physical, social, cognitive and emotional development, represents a target population for sexual health promotion and education when it comes to achieving the 2030 Agenda goals for sustainable and equitable societies. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of what is known about the dissemination and effectiveness of sex education programs and thereby to inform better public policy making in this area. <i>Methodology</i>: We carried out a systematic review based on international scientific literature, in which only peer-reviewed papers were included. To identify reviews, we carried out an electronic search of the Cochrane Database Reviews, ERIC, Web of Science, PubMed, Medline, Scopus and PsycINFO. This paper provides a narrative review of reviews of the literature from 2015 to 2020. <i>Results</i>: 20 reviews met the inclusion criteria (10 in school settings, 9 using digital platforms and 1 blended learning program): they focused mainly on reducing risk behaviors (e.g., VIH/STIs and unwanted pregnancies), whilst obviating themes such as desire and pleasure, which were not included in outcome evaluations. The reviews with the lowest risk of bias are those carried out in school settings and are the ones that most question the effectiveness of sex education programs. Whilst the reviews of digital platforms and blended learning show greater effectiveness in terms of promoting sexual and reproductive health in adolescents (ASRH), they nevertheless also include greater risks of bias. <i>Conclusion</i>: A more rigorous assessment of the effectiveness of sexual education programs is necessary, especially regarding the opportunities offered by new technologies, which may lead to more cost-effective interventions than with in-person programs. Moreover, blended learning programs offer a promising way forward, as they combine the best of face-to-face and digital interventions, and may provide an excellent tool in the new context of the COVID-19 pandemic.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2555adolescentssexual educationsexual and reproductive healthreview of reviewsschool settingdigital platforms |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
María Lameiras-Fernández Rosana Martínez-Román María Victoria Carrera-Fernández Yolanda Rodríguez-Castro |
spellingShingle |
María Lameiras-Fernández Rosana Martínez-Román María Victoria Carrera-Fernández Yolanda Rodríguez-Castro Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health adolescents sexual education sexual and reproductive health review of reviews school setting digital platforms |
author_facet |
María Lameiras-Fernández Rosana Martínez-Román María Victoria Carrera-Fernández Yolanda Rodríguez-Castro |
author_sort |
María Lameiras-Fernández |
title |
Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review |
title_short |
Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review |
title_full |
Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review |
title_fullStr |
Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sex Education in the Spotlight: What Is Working? Systematic Review |
title_sort |
sex education in the spotlight: what is working? systematic review |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1661-7827 1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Adolescence, a period of physical, social, cognitive and emotional development, represents a target population for sexual health promotion and education when it comes to achieving the 2030 Agenda goals for sustainable and equitable societies. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of what is known about the dissemination and effectiveness of sex education programs and thereby to inform better public policy making in this area. <i>Methodology</i>: We carried out a systematic review based on international scientific literature, in which only peer-reviewed papers were included. To identify reviews, we carried out an electronic search of the Cochrane Database Reviews, ERIC, Web of Science, PubMed, Medline, Scopus and PsycINFO. This paper provides a narrative review of reviews of the literature from 2015 to 2020. <i>Results</i>: 20 reviews met the inclusion criteria (10 in school settings, 9 using digital platforms and 1 blended learning program): they focused mainly on reducing risk behaviors (e.g., VIH/STIs and unwanted pregnancies), whilst obviating themes such as desire and pleasure, which were not included in outcome evaluations. The reviews with the lowest risk of bias are those carried out in school settings and are the ones that most question the effectiveness of sex education programs. Whilst the reviews of digital platforms and blended learning show greater effectiveness in terms of promoting sexual and reproductive health in adolescents (ASRH), they nevertheless also include greater risks of bias. <i>Conclusion</i>: A more rigorous assessment of the effectiveness of sexual education programs is necessary, especially regarding the opportunities offered by new technologies, which may lead to more cost-effective interventions than with in-person programs. Moreover, blended learning programs offer a promising way forward, as they combine the best of face-to-face and digital interventions, and may provide an excellent tool in the new context of the COVID-19 pandemic. |
topic |
adolescents sexual education sexual and reproductive health review of reviews school setting digital platforms |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/5/2555 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marialameirasfernandez sexeducationinthespotlightwhatisworkingsystematicreview AT rosanamartinezroman sexeducationinthespotlightwhatisworkingsystematicreview AT mariavictoriacarrerafernandez sexeducationinthespotlightwhatisworkingsystematicreview AT yolandarodriguezcastro sexeducationinthespotlightwhatisworkingsystematicreview |
_version_ |
1724231350858285056 |