How do we share food? Feeding of four amphibian species from an aquatic habitat in south–western Romania

The feeding of four amphibian species (Triturus cristatus, Lissotriton vulgaris, Bombina variegata, Pelophylax ridibundus) was studied in 2011, in south–western Romania. The diet of the newts was uniform and mostly composed of aquatic preys The diet of the anurans was more diversified, comprising mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bogdan, H. V., Covaciu–Marcov, S.–D., Gaceu, O., Cicort–Lucaciu, A.–S., Ferenţi, S., Sas–Kovács, I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona 2013-01-01
Series:Animal Biodiversity and Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://abc.museucienciesjournals.cat/files/ABC_36-1_2013_pp_89-99.pdf
id doaj-5c7cd781447d4133b22e5b0635d66b32
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c7cd781447d4133b22e5b0635d66b322020-11-24T22:10:26ZengMuseu de Ciències Naturals de BarcelonaAnimal Biodiversity and Conservation1578-665X2013-01-013618999How do we share food? Feeding of four amphibian species from an aquatic habitat in south–western RomaniaBogdan, H. V.Covaciu–Marcov, S.–D.Gaceu, O.Cicort–Lucaciu, A.–S.Ferenţi, S.Sas–Kovács, I.The feeding of four amphibian species (Triturus cristatus, Lissotriton vulgaris, Bombina variegata, Pelophylax ridibundus) was studied in 2011, in south–western Romania. The diet of the newts was uniform and mostly composed of aquatic preys The diet of the anurans was more diversified, comprising more prey taxa, mostly terrestrial. The trophic niches of the two newt species overlapped highly but differed from those of the anurans. The trophic niches of the anurans differed from one another. The differences among the four species’ diets were determined by the use of different trophic resources, originating from different environments, and by their different sizes. The newts’ diet was less diversified because the aquatic habitat was small and poor in trophic availability. The anurans used the aquatic habitat as a base from where they captured terrestrial preys in the surrounding terrestrial environment.http://abc.museucienciesjournals.cat/files/ABC_36-1_2013_pp_89-99.pdfAmphibian communityDietFood compositionTrophic nicheDiversity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bogdan, H. V.
Covaciu–Marcov, S.–D.
Gaceu, O.
Cicort–Lucaciu, A.–S.
Ferenţi, S.
Sas–Kovács, I.
spellingShingle Bogdan, H. V.
Covaciu–Marcov, S.–D.
Gaceu, O.
Cicort–Lucaciu, A.–S.
Ferenţi, S.
Sas–Kovács, I.
How do we share food? Feeding of four amphibian species from an aquatic habitat in south–western Romania
Animal Biodiversity and Conservation
Amphibian community
Diet
Food composition
Trophic niche
Diversity
author_facet Bogdan, H. V.
Covaciu–Marcov, S.–D.
Gaceu, O.
Cicort–Lucaciu, A.–S.
Ferenţi, S.
Sas–Kovács, I.
author_sort Bogdan, H. V.
title How do we share food? Feeding of four amphibian species from an aquatic habitat in south–western Romania
title_short How do we share food? Feeding of four amphibian species from an aquatic habitat in south–western Romania
title_full How do we share food? Feeding of four amphibian species from an aquatic habitat in south–western Romania
title_fullStr How do we share food? Feeding of four amphibian species from an aquatic habitat in south–western Romania
title_full_unstemmed How do we share food? Feeding of four amphibian species from an aquatic habitat in south–western Romania
title_sort how do we share food? feeding of four amphibian species from an aquatic habitat in south–western romania
publisher Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona
series Animal Biodiversity and Conservation
issn 1578-665X
publishDate 2013-01-01
description The feeding of four amphibian species (Triturus cristatus, Lissotriton vulgaris, Bombina variegata, Pelophylax ridibundus) was studied in 2011, in south–western Romania. The diet of the newts was uniform and mostly composed of aquatic preys The diet of the anurans was more diversified, comprising more prey taxa, mostly terrestrial. The trophic niches of the two newt species overlapped highly but differed from those of the anurans. The trophic niches of the anurans differed from one another. The differences among the four species’ diets were determined by the use of different trophic resources, originating from different environments, and by their different sizes. The newts’ diet was less diversified because the aquatic habitat was small and poor in trophic availability. The anurans used the aquatic habitat as a base from where they captured terrestrial preys in the surrounding terrestrial environment.
topic Amphibian community
Diet
Food composition
Trophic niche
Diversity
url http://abc.museucienciesjournals.cat/files/ABC_36-1_2013_pp_89-99.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bogdanhv howdowesharefoodfeedingoffouramphibianspeciesfromanaquatichabitatinsouthwesternromania
AT covaciumarcovsd howdowesharefoodfeedingoffouramphibianspeciesfromanaquatichabitatinsouthwesternromania
AT gaceuo howdowesharefoodfeedingoffouramphibianspeciesfromanaquatichabitatinsouthwesternromania
AT cicortlucaciuas howdowesharefoodfeedingoffouramphibianspeciesfromanaquatichabitatinsouthwesternromania
AT ferentis howdowesharefoodfeedingoffouramphibianspeciesfromanaquatichabitatinsouthwesternromania
AT saskovacsi howdowesharefoodfeedingoffouramphibianspeciesfromanaquatichabitatinsouthwesternromania
_version_ 1725808276789002240