Femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of complete versus incomplete rings for keratoconus treatment

Mohamed Hosny, Esraa El–Mayah, Mohamed Karim Sidky, Mohamed Anis Department of Ophthalmology, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt Purpose: To compare complete versus incomplete ring implantation for keratoconus correction.Methods: We investigated 25 eyes of keratoconic patients, of which 15 had...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hosny M, El–Mayah E, Sidky MK, Anis M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2015-01-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://www.dovepress.com/femtosecond-laser-assisted-implantation-of-complete-versus-incomplete--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
id doaj-5c78dedf45f94b85be6112a1a72bc60a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c78dedf45f94b85be6112a1a72bc60a2020-11-24T21:27:14ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832015-01-012015default12112720098Femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of complete versus incomplete rings for keratoconus treatmentHosny MEl–Mayah ESidky MKAnis M Mohamed Hosny, Esraa El–Mayah, Mohamed Karim Sidky, Mohamed Anis Department of Ophthalmology, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt Purpose: To compare complete versus incomplete ring implantation for keratoconus correction.Methods: We investigated 25 eyes of keratoconic patients, of which 15 had femtosecond-assisted MyoRing corneal implantation (Group 1) and 10 had femtosecond-assisted Keraring segments (Group 2). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), mean K (Km), sphere, topographic cylinder, and corneal asphericity value (Q-value) were measured in all eyes preoperatively and at 4 weeks postoperatively (1 month).Results: In Group 1, the Km change was -6.15±2.16 D, with a mean change in sphere of 4.45±2.18 D and a mean change in refractive cylinder of 2.32±3 D. UCVA change was -0.57±0.273 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR), BCVA change was -0.2±0.27 (LogMAR), and the Q-value change was 0.43±2.6. In Group 2, the Km change was -3.15±1.68 D, UCVA change was -0.48±0.37 (LogMAR), BCVA change was -0.09±0.15 (LogMAR), and the Q-value change was 0.5±0.21. Changes in the means did not significantly differ between groups, except for the Km change, which was significantly greater in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P=0.05).Conclusion: Both complete ring and ring segment implantation are effective for improving corneal and visual parameters in keratoconus. Complete ring implantation may have a greater flattening effect on the anterior corneal surface. Keywords: KeraRing, MyoRing, keratoconus, femtosecondhttp://www.dovepress.com/femtosecond-laser-assisted-implantation-of-complete-versus-incomplete--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hosny M
El–Mayah E
Sidky MK
Anis M
spellingShingle Hosny M
El–Mayah E
Sidky MK
Anis M
Femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of complete versus incomplete rings for keratoconus treatment
Clinical Ophthalmology
author_facet Hosny M
El–Mayah E
Sidky MK
Anis M
author_sort Hosny M
title Femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of complete versus incomplete rings for keratoconus treatment
title_short Femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of complete versus incomplete rings for keratoconus treatment
title_full Femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of complete versus incomplete rings for keratoconus treatment
title_fullStr Femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of complete versus incomplete rings for keratoconus treatment
title_full_unstemmed Femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of complete versus incomplete rings for keratoconus treatment
title_sort femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of complete versus incomplete rings for keratoconus treatment
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Clinical Ophthalmology
issn 1177-5483
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Mohamed Hosny, Esraa El–Mayah, Mohamed Karim Sidky, Mohamed Anis Department of Ophthalmology, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt Purpose: To compare complete versus incomplete ring implantation for keratoconus correction.Methods: We investigated 25 eyes of keratoconic patients, of which 15 had femtosecond-assisted MyoRing corneal implantation (Group 1) and 10 had femtosecond-assisted Keraring segments (Group 2). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), mean K (Km), sphere, topographic cylinder, and corneal asphericity value (Q-value) were measured in all eyes preoperatively and at 4 weeks postoperatively (1 month).Results: In Group 1, the Km change was -6.15±2.16 D, with a mean change in sphere of 4.45±2.18 D and a mean change in refractive cylinder of 2.32±3 D. UCVA change was -0.57±0.273 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR), BCVA change was -0.2±0.27 (LogMAR), and the Q-value change was 0.43±2.6. In Group 2, the Km change was -3.15±1.68 D, UCVA change was -0.48±0.37 (LogMAR), BCVA change was -0.09±0.15 (LogMAR), and the Q-value change was 0.5±0.21. Changes in the means did not significantly differ between groups, except for the Km change, which was significantly greater in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P=0.05).Conclusion: Both complete ring and ring segment implantation are effective for improving corneal and visual parameters in keratoconus. Complete ring implantation may have a greater flattening effect on the anterior corneal surface. Keywords: KeraRing, MyoRing, keratoconus, femtosecond
url http://www.dovepress.com/femtosecond-laser-assisted-implantation-of-complete-versus-incomplete--peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
work_keys_str_mv AT hosnym femtosecondlaserassistedimplantationofcompleteversusincompleteringsforkeratoconustreatment
AT elmayahe femtosecondlaserassistedimplantationofcompleteversusincompleteringsforkeratoconustreatment
AT sidkymk femtosecondlaserassistedimplantationofcompleteversusincompleteringsforkeratoconustreatment
AT anism femtosecondlaserassistedimplantationofcompleteversusincompleteringsforkeratoconustreatment
_version_ 1716714776079368192