Composite Hybrid Framework for Through-Life Multi-Objective Failure Analysis and Optimisation

Complex engineering systems include several subsystems that interact in a stochastic and multifaceted manner with multiple failure modes (FMs). The dynamic nature of FMs introduces uncertainties that negatively impact the reliability, risk, and maintenance of complex systems. Traditional approaches...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frederick Appoh, Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2021-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9422715/
id doaj-5c78b863ed8a4bf99bece923ad8c0d38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c78b863ed8a4bf99bece923ad8c0d382021-05-27T23:02:44ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362021-01-019715057152010.1109/ACCESS.2021.30772849422715Composite Hybrid Framework for Through-Life Multi-Objective Failure Analysis and OptimisationFrederick Appoh0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4228-5799Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5138-3783Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, U.K.Complex engineering systems include several subsystems that interact in a stochastic and multifaceted manner with multiple failure modes (FMs). The dynamic nature of FMs introduces uncertainties that negatively impact the reliability, risk, and maintenance of complex systems. Traditional approaches of adopting standalone techniques for managing FMs independently at various stages of the asset life cycle pose challenges related to utilisation, costs, availability, and in some cases, accidents. Therefore, this paper proposes a composite hybrid framework comprising four independent hybrid models for comprehensive through-life failure management and optimisation. The first hybrid model entails failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) and fault tree analysis (FTA) to identify critical FMs and overall subsystem failure rates. The second hybrid model analyses FMs caused by multiple subsystems using hybrid dynamic Bayesian discretisation. The third hybrid model adopts a hybrid Gaussian process regression machine learning technique to evaluate wear loss. The fourth hybrid model evaluates the overall risk using a Bayesian factorisation and elimination method based on multiple failure causes. Finally, a decision-making step is used to evaluate the results of the previous four steps to decide an appropriate maintenance strategy. The proposed method is verified through a case study of a UK-based train operator’s pantograph system. The results show that the maintenance inspection intervals and strategy obtained using the proposed framework strike a good balance between safety and fleet availability.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9422715/Multiple failure modesreliabilityriskmaintenancehybrid framework
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Frederick Appoh
Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo
spellingShingle Frederick Appoh
Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo
Composite Hybrid Framework for Through-Life Multi-Objective Failure Analysis and Optimisation
IEEE Access
Multiple failure modes
reliability
risk
maintenance
hybrid framework
author_facet Frederick Appoh
Akilu Yunusa-Kaltungo
author_sort Frederick Appoh
title Composite Hybrid Framework for Through-Life Multi-Objective Failure Analysis and Optimisation
title_short Composite Hybrid Framework for Through-Life Multi-Objective Failure Analysis and Optimisation
title_full Composite Hybrid Framework for Through-Life Multi-Objective Failure Analysis and Optimisation
title_fullStr Composite Hybrid Framework for Through-Life Multi-Objective Failure Analysis and Optimisation
title_full_unstemmed Composite Hybrid Framework for Through-Life Multi-Objective Failure Analysis and Optimisation
title_sort composite hybrid framework for through-life multi-objective failure analysis and optimisation
publisher IEEE
series IEEE Access
issn 2169-3536
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Complex engineering systems include several subsystems that interact in a stochastic and multifaceted manner with multiple failure modes (FMs). The dynamic nature of FMs introduces uncertainties that negatively impact the reliability, risk, and maintenance of complex systems. Traditional approaches of adopting standalone techniques for managing FMs independently at various stages of the asset life cycle pose challenges related to utilisation, costs, availability, and in some cases, accidents. Therefore, this paper proposes a composite hybrid framework comprising four independent hybrid models for comprehensive through-life failure management and optimisation. The first hybrid model entails failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) and fault tree analysis (FTA) to identify critical FMs and overall subsystem failure rates. The second hybrid model analyses FMs caused by multiple subsystems using hybrid dynamic Bayesian discretisation. The third hybrid model adopts a hybrid Gaussian process regression machine learning technique to evaluate wear loss. The fourth hybrid model evaluates the overall risk using a Bayesian factorisation and elimination method based on multiple failure causes. Finally, a decision-making step is used to evaluate the results of the previous four steps to decide an appropriate maintenance strategy. The proposed method is verified through a case study of a UK-based train operator’s pantograph system. The results show that the maintenance inspection intervals and strategy obtained using the proposed framework strike a good balance between safety and fleet availability.
topic Multiple failure modes
reliability
risk
maintenance
hybrid framework
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9422715/
work_keys_str_mv AT frederickappoh compositehybridframeworkforthroughlifemultiobjectivefailureanalysisandoptimisation
AT akiluyunusakaltungo compositehybridframeworkforthroughlifemultiobjectivefailureanalysisandoptimisation
_version_ 1721425204954005504