Transdisciplinarity in objects: Spatial signification from graffiti to hegemony

Contemporary sociosemiotics is a way to transcend borderlines between trends inside semiotics, and also other disciplines. Whereas semiotics has been considered as an interdisciplinary field of research par excellence, sociosemiotics can point directions at transdisciplinary research. The present ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anti Randviir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tartu Press 2011-12-01
Series:Sign Systems Studies
Online Access:https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15729
id doaj-5c5dddc153934cd68894def6a1e87568
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c5dddc153934cd68894def6a1e875682021-04-02T12:56:17ZengUniversity of Tartu PressSign Systems Studies1406-42431736-74092011-12-01392/410.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.05Transdisciplinarity in objects: Spatial signification from graffiti to hegemonyAnti RandviirContemporary sociosemiotics is a way to transcend borderlines between trends inside semiotics, and also other disciplines. Whereas semiotics has been considered as an interdisciplinary field of research par excellence, sociosemiotics can point directions at transdisciplinary research. The present article will try to conjoin the structural and the processual views on culture and society, binding them together with the notion of signification. The signification of space will illustrate the dynamic between both cultures and metacultures, and cultural mainstreams and subcultures. This paper pays attention to the practice of sociocultural semiotisation of space and territorialisation by diverse examples and different sociocultural levels that imply semiotic cooperation between several members of groups that can be characterised as socii. We analyse territorialisation by graffiti, by furnishing spatial environment through artistic manners, by shaping the semiotic essence of cities through naming, renaming and translating street names, by pinning and structuring territories with monuments, by landmarking and mapping cultural space through individualisation of cities. We will see how principles of semiotisation of space are valid on different levels (individual and social, formal and informal, democratic and hegemonic, cultural and subcultural) and how these principles form a transdisciplinary object of study as ‘semiotisation of space’, and how space can be regarded as a genuinely transdisciplinary research object. Individual, culture, and society are connected in such an object both as constituents and as a background of study.https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15729
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anti Randviir
spellingShingle Anti Randviir
Transdisciplinarity in objects: Spatial signification from graffiti to hegemony
Sign Systems Studies
author_facet Anti Randviir
author_sort Anti Randviir
title Transdisciplinarity in objects: Spatial signification from graffiti to hegemony
title_short Transdisciplinarity in objects: Spatial signification from graffiti to hegemony
title_full Transdisciplinarity in objects: Spatial signification from graffiti to hegemony
title_fullStr Transdisciplinarity in objects: Spatial signification from graffiti to hegemony
title_full_unstemmed Transdisciplinarity in objects: Spatial signification from graffiti to hegemony
title_sort transdisciplinarity in objects: spatial signification from graffiti to hegemony
publisher University of Tartu Press
series Sign Systems Studies
issn 1406-4243
1736-7409
publishDate 2011-12-01
description Contemporary sociosemiotics is a way to transcend borderlines between trends inside semiotics, and also other disciplines. Whereas semiotics has been considered as an interdisciplinary field of research par excellence, sociosemiotics can point directions at transdisciplinary research. The present article will try to conjoin the structural and the processual views on culture and society, binding them together with the notion of signification. The signification of space will illustrate the dynamic between both cultures and metacultures, and cultural mainstreams and subcultures. This paper pays attention to the practice of sociocultural semiotisation of space and territorialisation by diverse examples and different sociocultural levels that imply semiotic cooperation between several members of groups that can be characterised as socii. We analyse territorialisation by graffiti, by furnishing spatial environment through artistic manners, by shaping the semiotic essence of cities through naming, renaming and translating street names, by pinning and structuring territories with monuments, by landmarking and mapping cultural space through individualisation of cities. We will see how principles of semiotisation of space are valid on different levels (individual and social, formal and informal, democratic and hegemonic, cultural and subcultural) and how these principles form a transdisciplinary object of study as ‘semiotisation of space’, and how space can be regarded as a genuinely transdisciplinary research object. Individual, culture, and society are connected in such an object both as constituents and as a background of study.
url https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15729
work_keys_str_mv AT antirandviir transdisciplinarityinobjectsspatialsignificationfromgraffititohegemony
_version_ 1721567070034853888