Evaluating the role of quality assessment of primary studies in systematic reviews of cancer practice guidelines
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of study quality assessment of primary studies in cancer practice guidelines.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Reliable and valid study quality assessment scales were so...
Main Authors: | Charette Manya L, Johnston Mary E, Brouwers Melissa C, Hanna Steve E, Jadad Alejandro R, Browman George P |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2005-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/5/8 |
Similar Items
-
Clinicians' evaluations of, endorsements of, and intentions to use practice guidelines change over time: a retrospective analysis from an organized guideline program
by: Abdel-Motagally Mona, et al.
Published: (2009-06-01) -
Doxorubicin-Based Chemotherapy for the Palliative Treatment of Adult
Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcoma:
A Meta-Analysis and Clinical Practice Guideline
by: Vivien H. C. Bramwell, et al.
Published: (2000-01-01) -
Can surveying practitioners about their practices help identify priority clinical practice guideline topics?
by: Chambers Alexandra, et al.
Published: (2003-12-01) -
Systematic assessment of the quality of osteoporosis guidelines
by: Byszewski A, et al.
Published: (2002-08-01) -
Guideline-based quality indicators—a systematic comparison of German and international clinical practice guidelines
by: Monika Becker, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)