Do food cinemagraphs evoke stronger appetitive responses than stills?

Viewing images of food triggers the desire to eat and this effect increases when images represent food in a more vivid way. Cinemagraphs are a new medium that is intermediate between photographs and videos: most of the frame is static, while some details are animated in a seamless loop, resulting i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Toet, Alexander, van Schaik, Martin G., Kaneko, Daisuke, van Erp, Jan B. F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Intellect 2019-04-01
Series:International Journal of Food Design
Online Access:https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/10.1386/ijfd.4.1.63_1
id doaj-5c382a7ddfab468ab8e7d4b26a8335b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c382a7ddfab468ab8e7d4b26a8335b82020-11-25T03:39:15ZengIntellect International Journal of Food Design 2056-65222056-65302019-04-0141638310.1386/ijfd.4.1.63_1ijfd.4.1.63Do food cinemagraphs evoke stronger appetitive responses than stills?Toet, Alexandervan Schaik, Martin G.Kaneko, Daisukevan Erp, Jan B. F. Viewing images of food triggers the desire to eat and this effect increases when images represent food in a more vivid way. Cinemagraphs are a new medium that is intermediate between photographs and videos: most of the frame is static, while some details are animated in a seamless loop, resulting in a vivid viewing experience. On social media cinemagraphs are increasingly used for food-related communication. Given their vivid appearance we hypothesized that food cinemagraphs may evoke stronger appetitive responses than their static counterparts (stills). This would make them a promising medium for food advertisements on the Internet or on digital menu boards. In this study we measured the ‘wanting’ (appetitive) and ‘liking’ (affective) responses to both cinemagraph and stills representing a wide range of different food products. Our results show that food cinemagraphs slightly increase ‘wanting’ scores while not affecting ‘liking’ scores, compared to similar stills. Although we found no overall main effect of image dynamics on ‘liking’, we did observe a significant effect for some individual food items. The effects of image dynamics on ‘wanting’ and ‘liking’ appear to be product specific: while dynamic images were scored higher on ‘wanting’ or ‘liking’ for some products, static images were scored higher on these factors for other products. Observer responses to a free association task indicate that image dynamics can affect the appeal of a food product in two ways: by emphasizing its hedonic qualities (lusciousness, freshness) and by enhancing the observers’ awareness of their own core affect (‘liking’) for the product. We conclude that the effective use of cinemagraphs in food advertisements therefore requires a careful consideration of the characteristics (hedonic aspects) of the food product that are to be highlighted through image motion and the inherent preferences (core liking) of the target group.https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/10.1386/ijfd.4.1.63_1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Toet, Alexander
van Schaik, Martin G.
Kaneko, Daisuke
van Erp, Jan B. F.
spellingShingle Toet, Alexander
van Schaik, Martin G.
Kaneko, Daisuke
van Erp, Jan B. F.
Do food cinemagraphs evoke stronger appetitive responses than stills?
International Journal of Food Design
author_facet Toet, Alexander
van Schaik, Martin G.
Kaneko, Daisuke
van Erp, Jan B. F.
author_sort Toet, Alexander
title Do food cinemagraphs evoke stronger appetitive responses than stills?
title_short Do food cinemagraphs evoke stronger appetitive responses than stills?
title_full Do food cinemagraphs evoke stronger appetitive responses than stills?
title_fullStr Do food cinemagraphs evoke stronger appetitive responses than stills?
title_full_unstemmed Do food cinemagraphs evoke stronger appetitive responses than stills?
title_sort do food cinemagraphs evoke stronger appetitive responses than stills?
publisher Intellect
series International Journal of Food Design
issn 2056-6522
2056-6530
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Viewing images of food triggers the desire to eat and this effect increases when images represent food in a more vivid way. Cinemagraphs are a new medium that is intermediate between photographs and videos: most of the frame is static, while some details are animated in a seamless loop, resulting in a vivid viewing experience. On social media cinemagraphs are increasingly used for food-related communication. Given their vivid appearance we hypothesized that food cinemagraphs may evoke stronger appetitive responses than their static counterparts (stills). This would make them a promising medium for food advertisements on the Internet or on digital menu boards. In this study we measured the ‘wanting’ (appetitive) and ‘liking’ (affective) responses to both cinemagraph and stills representing a wide range of different food products. Our results show that food cinemagraphs slightly increase ‘wanting’ scores while not affecting ‘liking’ scores, compared to similar stills. Although we found no overall main effect of image dynamics on ‘liking’, we did observe a significant effect for some individual food items. The effects of image dynamics on ‘wanting’ and ‘liking’ appear to be product specific: while dynamic images were scored higher on ‘wanting’ or ‘liking’ for some products, static images were scored higher on these factors for other products. Observer responses to a free association task indicate that image dynamics can affect the appeal of a food product in two ways: by emphasizing its hedonic qualities (lusciousness, freshness) and by enhancing the observers’ awareness of their own core affect (‘liking’) for the product. We conclude that the effective use of cinemagraphs in food advertisements therefore requires a careful consideration of the characteristics (hedonic aspects) of the food product that are to be highlighted through image motion and the inherent preferences (core liking) of the target group.
url https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/10.1386/ijfd.4.1.63_1
work_keys_str_mv AT toetalexander dofoodcinemagraphsevokestrongerappetitiveresponsesthanstills
AT vanschaikmarting dofoodcinemagraphsevokestrongerappetitiveresponsesthanstills
AT kanekodaisuke dofoodcinemagraphsevokestrongerappetitiveresponsesthanstills
AT vanerpjanbf dofoodcinemagraphsevokestrongerappetitiveresponsesthanstills
_version_ 1724540058615152640