Can Science Lead Us to a Definition of Art?
For approximately two thousand years, human thinkers have been attempting to define a behaviour, referred to as art, that humans have been practicing for tens of thousands of years. Defining this term has proved to be so difficult that Munro (1949: 5) to claim that the arts “are too intangible an...
Main Author: | Kathryn Coe |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Firenze University Press
2013-12-01
|
Series: | Aisthesis |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.fupress.net/index.php/aisthesis/article/view/13775 |
Similar Items
-
Can Science Lead Us to a Definition of Art?
by: Kathryn Coe
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Dutton, Davies, and Imaginative Virtual Worlds: The Current State of Evolutionary Aesthetics
by: Joseph Carroll
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Dutton, Davies, and Imaginative Virtual Worlds: The Current State of Evolutionary Aesthetics
by: Joseph Carroll
Published: (2013-12-01) -
Prima e al di là dell’arte: origine dei segni e delle figurazioni nell’arte paleolitica
by: Fabio Martini
Published: (2013-12-01) -
“Aesthetic Primitives”: Fundamental Biological Elements of a Naturalistic Aesthetics
by: Ellen Dissanayake
Published: (2015-05-01)