COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA

The constitutions and courts both in India and in Pakistan have shown their aspirations and fundamental faith in the federal structure but in practice there is a strong centripetal bias in each of their constitutional-political structures. This bias becomes more evident when the constitution sanctio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Panch Rishi Dev Sharma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Publshing House V.Ема 2017-07-01
Series:BRICS Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/99
id doaj-5c2c0ec4570148b8822d5b0203bbd0bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c2c0ec4570148b8822d5b0203bbd0bf2021-07-29T07:56:10ZengPublshing House V.ЕмаBRICS Law Journal2409-90582412-23432017-07-0142719410.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-2-71-9476COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTAPanch Rishi Dev Sharma0Public University of LucknowThe constitutions and courts both in India and in Pakistan have shown their aspirations and fundamental faith in the federal structure but in practice there is a strong centripetal bias in each of their constitutional-political structures. This bias becomes more evident when the constitution sanctions power to the centre to proclaim emergency situations in the provinces on the basis of Constitutional Machinery Failure. Emerging from their colonial roots, the constitutions of India and Pakistan contain an identical provision on Constitutional Machinery Failure Emergency which has been misused and abused regularly and has been the biggest question mark on federal claims of the two States. This unique system of Constitutional Machinery Failure Emergency has also gone through a number of radical changes in India and Pakistan, which often have been influenced by each other. The article specifies the socio-political-constitutional background of Constitutional Machinery Failure resulting in Provincial Emergency, both in India and in Pakistan, their respective use and abuse by the Executive, legislative attempts to amend and control such power, and judicial response, with similarities and differences in respect of justifiability of such Emergency Proclamations.https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/99india and pakistancomparative federalismconstitutional failure emergency modelconstitutional machinery failure emergencydefunct federalismdefunct democracy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Panch Rishi Dev Sharma
spellingShingle Panch Rishi Dev Sharma
COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA
BRICS Law Journal
india and pakistan
comparative federalism
constitutional failure emergency model
constitutional machinery failure emergency
defunct federalism
defunct democracy
author_facet Panch Rishi Dev Sharma
author_sort Panch Rishi Dev Sharma
title COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA
title_short COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA
title_full COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA
title_sort comparative federalism with reference to constitutional machinery failure (emergency) in india and pakista
publisher Publshing House V.Ема
series BRICS Law Journal
issn 2409-9058
2412-2343
publishDate 2017-07-01
description The constitutions and courts both in India and in Pakistan have shown their aspirations and fundamental faith in the federal structure but in practice there is a strong centripetal bias in each of their constitutional-political structures. This bias becomes more evident when the constitution sanctions power to the centre to proclaim emergency situations in the provinces on the basis of Constitutional Machinery Failure. Emerging from their colonial roots, the constitutions of India and Pakistan contain an identical provision on Constitutional Machinery Failure Emergency which has been misused and abused regularly and has been the biggest question mark on federal claims of the two States. This unique system of Constitutional Machinery Failure Emergency has also gone through a number of radical changes in India and Pakistan, which often have been influenced by each other. The article specifies the socio-political-constitutional background of Constitutional Machinery Failure resulting in Provincial Emergency, both in India and in Pakistan, their respective use and abuse by the Executive, legislative attempts to amend and control such power, and judicial response, with similarities and differences in respect of justifiability of such Emergency Proclamations.
topic india and pakistan
comparative federalism
constitutional failure emergency model
constitutional machinery failure emergency
defunct federalism
defunct democracy
url https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/99
work_keys_str_mv AT panchrishidevsharma comparativefederalismwithreferencetoconstitutionalmachineryfailureemergencyinindiaandpakista
_version_ 1721259260755574784