COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA
The constitutions and courts both in India and in Pakistan have shown their aspirations and fundamental faith in the federal structure but in practice there is a strong centripetal bias in each of their constitutional-political structures. This bias becomes more evident when the constitution sanctio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Publshing House V.Ема
2017-07-01
|
Series: | BRICS Law Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/99 |
id |
doaj-5c2c0ec4570148b8822d5b0203bbd0bf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5c2c0ec4570148b8822d5b0203bbd0bf2021-07-29T07:56:10ZengPublshing House V.ЕмаBRICS Law Journal2409-90582412-23432017-07-0142719410.21684/2412-2343-2017-4-2-71-9476COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTAPanch Rishi Dev Sharma0Public University of LucknowThe constitutions and courts both in India and in Pakistan have shown their aspirations and fundamental faith in the federal structure but in practice there is a strong centripetal bias in each of their constitutional-political structures. This bias becomes more evident when the constitution sanctions power to the centre to proclaim emergency situations in the provinces on the basis of Constitutional Machinery Failure. Emerging from their colonial roots, the constitutions of India and Pakistan contain an identical provision on Constitutional Machinery Failure Emergency which has been misused and abused regularly and has been the biggest question mark on federal claims of the two States. This unique system of Constitutional Machinery Failure Emergency has also gone through a number of radical changes in India and Pakistan, which often have been influenced by each other. The article specifies the socio-political-constitutional background of Constitutional Machinery Failure resulting in Provincial Emergency, both in India and in Pakistan, their respective use and abuse by the Executive, legislative attempts to amend and control such power, and judicial response, with similarities and differences in respect of justifiability of such Emergency Proclamations.https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/99india and pakistancomparative federalismconstitutional failure emergency modelconstitutional machinery failure emergencydefunct federalismdefunct democracy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Panch Rishi Dev Sharma |
spellingShingle |
Panch Rishi Dev Sharma COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA BRICS Law Journal india and pakistan comparative federalism constitutional failure emergency model constitutional machinery failure emergency defunct federalism defunct democracy |
author_facet |
Panch Rishi Dev Sharma |
author_sort |
Panch Rishi Dev Sharma |
title |
COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA |
title_short |
COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA |
title_full |
COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA |
title_fullStr |
COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARATIVE FEDERALISM WITH REFERENCE TO CONSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY FAILURE (EMERGENCY) IN INDIA AND PAKISTA |
title_sort |
comparative federalism with reference to constitutional machinery failure (emergency) in india and pakista |
publisher |
Publshing House V.Ема |
series |
BRICS Law Journal |
issn |
2409-9058 2412-2343 |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
The constitutions and courts both in India and in Pakistan have shown their aspirations and fundamental faith in the federal structure but in practice there is a strong centripetal bias in each of their constitutional-political structures. This bias becomes more evident when the constitution sanctions power to the centre to proclaim emergency situations in the provinces on the basis of Constitutional Machinery Failure. Emerging from their colonial roots, the constitutions of India and Pakistan contain an identical provision on Constitutional Machinery Failure Emergency which has been misused and abused regularly and has been the biggest question mark on federal claims of the two States. This unique system of Constitutional Machinery Failure Emergency has also gone through a number of radical changes in India and Pakistan, which often have been influenced by each other. The article specifies the socio-political-constitutional background of Constitutional Machinery Failure resulting in Provincial Emergency, both in India and in Pakistan, their respective use and abuse by the Executive, legislative attempts to amend and control such power, and judicial response, with similarities and differences in respect of justifiability of such Emergency Proclamations. |
topic |
india and pakistan comparative federalism constitutional failure emergency model constitutional machinery failure emergency defunct federalism defunct democracy |
url |
https://www.bricslawjournal.com/jour/article/view/99 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT panchrishidevsharma comparativefederalismwithreferencetoconstitutionalmachineryfailureemergencyinindiaandpakista |
_version_ |
1721259260755574784 |