Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task
Suffixes have been shown to be recognized as units of processing in visual word recognition and their identification has been argued to be position-specific in skilled adult readers: in lexical decision tasks suffixes are automatically identified at word endings, but not at word beginnings. The pres...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Cognition |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/153 |
id |
doaj-5c2383d865f540949315b487798b1b87 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5c2383d865f540949315b487798b1b872021-03-16T05:04:56ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202021-02-014110.5334/joc.153163Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search TaskJana Hasenäcker0Maria Ktori1Davide Crepaldi2International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), TriesteInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), TriesteInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), TriesteSuffixes have been shown to be recognized as units of processing in visual word recognition and their identification has been argued to be position-specific in skilled adult readers: in lexical decision tasks suffixes are automatically identified at word endings, but not at word beginnings. The present study set out to investigate whether position-specific coding can be detected with a letter search task and whether children already code suffixes as position-specific units. A preregistered experiment was conducted in Italian in which 3rd-graders, 5th-graders, and adults had to detect a target letter that was either contained in the suffix of a pseudoword (e.g., 'S' in 'flagish') or in a non-suffix control (e.g., 'S' in 'flagosh'). To investigate sensitivity to position, letters also had to be detected in suffixes and non-suffixes placed in reversed position, that is in the beginning of pseudowords (e.g., 'S' in 'ishflag' vs. 'oshflag'). Results suggested position-specific processing differences between suffixes and non-suffixes that develop throughout reading development. However, some effects were weak and only partially compatible with the hypotheses. Therefore, a second experiment was conducted. The effects of position-specific suffix identification could not be replicated. A combined analysis additionally using a Bayesian approach indicated no processing differences between suffixes and non-suffixes in our task. We discuss potential interpretations and the possibility of letter search being unsuited to investigate morpheme processing. We connect our example of failed self-replication to the current discussion about the replication crisis in psychology and the lesson psycholinguistics can learn.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/153visual word processing: visual searchdevelopment of cognition: learning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jana Hasenäcker Maria Ktori Davide Crepaldi |
spellingShingle |
Jana Hasenäcker Maria Ktori Davide Crepaldi Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task Journal of Cognition visual word processing: visual search development of cognition: learning |
author_facet |
Jana Hasenäcker Maria Ktori Davide Crepaldi |
author_sort |
Jana Hasenäcker |
title |
Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task |
title_short |
Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task |
title_full |
Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task |
title_fullStr |
Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task |
title_full_unstemmed |
Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task |
title_sort |
morpheme position coding in reading development as explored with a letter search task |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Journal of Cognition |
issn |
2514-4820 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Suffixes have been shown to be recognized as units of processing in visual word recognition and their identification has been argued to be position-specific in skilled adult readers: in lexical decision tasks suffixes are automatically identified at word endings, but not at word beginnings. The present study set out to investigate whether position-specific coding can be detected with a letter search task and whether children already code suffixes as position-specific units. A preregistered experiment was conducted in Italian in which 3rd-graders, 5th-graders, and adults had to detect a target letter that was either contained in the suffix of a pseudoword (e.g., 'S' in 'flagish') or in a non-suffix control (e.g., 'S' in 'flagosh'). To investigate sensitivity to position, letters also had to be detected in suffixes and non-suffixes placed in reversed position, that is in the beginning of pseudowords (e.g., 'S' in 'ishflag' vs. 'oshflag'). Results suggested position-specific processing differences between suffixes and non-suffixes that develop throughout reading development. However, some effects were weak and only partially compatible with the hypotheses. Therefore, a second experiment was conducted. The effects of position-specific suffix identification could not be replicated. A combined analysis additionally using a Bayesian approach indicated no processing differences between suffixes and non-suffixes in our task. We discuss potential interpretations and the possibility of letter search being unsuited to investigate morpheme processing. We connect our example of failed self-replication to the current discussion about the replication crisis in psychology and the lesson psycholinguistics can learn. |
topic |
visual word processing: visual search development of cognition: learning |
url |
https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/153 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janahasenacker morphemepositioncodinginreadingdevelopmentasexploredwithalettersearchtask AT mariaktori morphemepositioncodinginreadingdevelopmentasexploredwithalettersearchtask AT davidecrepaldi morphemepositioncodinginreadingdevelopmentasexploredwithalettersearchtask |
_version_ |
1724219990850142208 |