Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task

Suffixes have been shown to be recognized as units of processing in visual word recognition and their identification has been argued to be position-specific in skilled adult readers: in lexical decision tasks suffixes are automatically identified at word endings, but not at word beginnings. The pres...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jana Hasenäcker, Maria Ktori, Davide Crepaldi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/153
id doaj-5c2383d865f540949315b487798b1b87
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c2383d865f540949315b487798b1b872021-03-16T05:04:56ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Cognition2514-48202021-02-014110.5334/joc.153163Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search TaskJana Hasenäcker0Maria Ktori1Davide Crepaldi2International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), TriesteInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), TriesteInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), TriesteSuffixes have been shown to be recognized as units of processing in visual word recognition and their identification has been argued to be position-specific in skilled adult readers: in lexical decision tasks suffixes are automatically identified at word endings, but not at word beginnings. The present study set out to investigate whether position-specific coding can be detected with a letter search task and whether children already code suffixes as position-specific units. A preregistered experiment was conducted in Italian in which 3rd-graders, 5th-graders, and adults had to detect a target letter that was either contained in the suffix of a pseudoword (e.g., 'S' in 'flagish') or in a non-suffix control (e.g., 'S' in 'flagosh'). To investigate sensitivity to position, letters also had to be detected in suffixes and non-suffixes placed in reversed position, that is in the beginning of pseudowords (e.g., 'S' in 'ishflag' vs. 'oshflag'). Results suggested position-specific processing differences between suffixes and non-suffixes that develop throughout reading development. However, some effects were weak and only partially compatible with the hypotheses. Therefore, a second experiment was conducted. The effects of position-specific suffix identification could not be replicated. A combined analysis additionally using a Bayesian approach indicated no processing differences between suffixes and non-suffixes in our task. We discuss potential interpretations and the possibility of letter search being unsuited to investigate morpheme processing. We connect our example of failed self-replication to the current discussion about the replication crisis in psychology and the lesson psycholinguistics can learn.https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/153visual word processing: visual searchdevelopment of cognition: learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jana Hasenäcker
Maria Ktori
Davide Crepaldi
spellingShingle Jana Hasenäcker
Maria Ktori
Davide Crepaldi
Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task
Journal of Cognition
visual word processing: visual search
development of cognition: learning
author_facet Jana Hasenäcker
Maria Ktori
Davide Crepaldi
author_sort Jana Hasenäcker
title Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task
title_short Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task
title_full Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task
title_fullStr Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task
title_full_unstemmed Morpheme Position Coding in Reading Development as Explored With a Letter Search Task
title_sort morpheme position coding in reading development as explored with a letter search task
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of Cognition
issn 2514-4820
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Suffixes have been shown to be recognized as units of processing in visual word recognition and their identification has been argued to be position-specific in skilled adult readers: in lexical decision tasks suffixes are automatically identified at word endings, but not at word beginnings. The present study set out to investigate whether position-specific coding can be detected with a letter search task and whether children already code suffixes as position-specific units. A preregistered experiment was conducted in Italian in which 3rd-graders, 5th-graders, and adults had to detect a target letter that was either contained in the suffix of a pseudoword (e.g., 'S' in 'flagish') or in a non-suffix control (e.g., 'S' in 'flagosh'). To investigate sensitivity to position, letters also had to be detected in suffixes and non-suffixes placed in reversed position, that is in the beginning of pseudowords (e.g., 'S' in 'ishflag' vs. 'oshflag'). Results suggested position-specific processing differences between suffixes and non-suffixes that develop throughout reading development. However, some effects were weak and only partially compatible with the hypotheses. Therefore, a second experiment was conducted. The effects of position-specific suffix identification could not be replicated. A combined analysis additionally using a Bayesian approach indicated no processing differences between suffixes and non-suffixes in our task. We discuss potential interpretations and the possibility of letter search being unsuited to investigate morpheme processing. We connect our example of failed self-replication to the current discussion about the replication crisis in psychology and the lesson psycholinguistics can learn.
topic visual word processing: visual search
development of cognition: learning
url https://www.journalofcognition.org/articles/153
work_keys_str_mv AT janahasenacker morphemepositioncodinginreadingdevelopmentasexploredwithalettersearchtask
AT mariaktori morphemepositioncodinginreadingdevelopmentasexploredwithalettersearchtask
AT davidecrepaldi morphemepositioncodinginreadingdevelopmentasexploredwithalettersearchtask
_version_ 1724219990850142208