Student Perceptions of Non-traditional Level I Fieldwork

Academic programs commonly face challenges in developing Level I fieldwork where students have ample opportunity to practice and understand occupation. In response to this challenge, our academic program developed a non-traditional Level I fieldwork. The purpose of this study was to understand the s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Nielsen, Janet S. Jedlicka, Debra Hanson, Lavonne Fox, Cherie Graves
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Eastern Kentucky University 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Occupational Therapy Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2017.010206
id doaj-5c0bc6bc72d84d81b3b8276bd7bb4307
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c0bc6bc72d84d81b3b8276bd7bb43072020-11-24T22:06:48ZengEastern Kentucky UniversityJournal of Occupational Therapy Education2573-13782017-01-011210.26681/jote.2017.010206Student Perceptions of Non-traditional Level I FieldworkSarah Nielsen0Janet S. Jedlicka1Debra Hanson2Lavonne Fox3Cherie Graves4University of North DakotaUniversity of North DakotaUniversity of North DakotaUniversity of North DakotaUniversity of North DakotaAcademic programs commonly face challenges in developing Level I fieldwork where students have ample opportunity to practice and understand occupation. In response to this challenge, our academic program developed a non-traditional Level I fieldwork. The purpose of this study was to understand the student perceptions of this learning experience. Focus group methodology was employed. Fifty-nine students participated in one of six focus groups. Six themes were identified through the data analysis process. These included challenges and rewards of effective communication, learning to think like an OT, a greater understanding and focus on occupations, developing skills in cultural understanding and advocacy, gaining confidence through doing, and the logistical challenges of getting everyone on the same page. These themes supported that students viewed non-traditional Level I fieldwork paired with structured classroom learning activities positively. A pattern across all themes was that students learned because they were able to make mistakes, reflect on them, and change their action. Limitations include that student perceptions are only one aspect of understanding the impact of learning experiences; therefore further study is needed.https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2017.010206Non-traditional level I fieldworkoccupational therapy educationcultural competencequalitative focus group
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah Nielsen
Janet S. Jedlicka
Debra Hanson
Lavonne Fox
Cherie Graves
spellingShingle Sarah Nielsen
Janet S. Jedlicka
Debra Hanson
Lavonne Fox
Cherie Graves
Student Perceptions of Non-traditional Level I Fieldwork
Journal of Occupational Therapy Education
Non-traditional level I fieldwork
occupational therapy education
cultural competence
qualitative focus group
author_facet Sarah Nielsen
Janet S. Jedlicka
Debra Hanson
Lavonne Fox
Cherie Graves
author_sort Sarah Nielsen
title Student Perceptions of Non-traditional Level I Fieldwork
title_short Student Perceptions of Non-traditional Level I Fieldwork
title_full Student Perceptions of Non-traditional Level I Fieldwork
title_fullStr Student Perceptions of Non-traditional Level I Fieldwork
title_full_unstemmed Student Perceptions of Non-traditional Level I Fieldwork
title_sort student perceptions of non-traditional level i fieldwork
publisher Eastern Kentucky University
series Journal of Occupational Therapy Education
issn 2573-1378
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Academic programs commonly face challenges in developing Level I fieldwork where students have ample opportunity to practice and understand occupation. In response to this challenge, our academic program developed a non-traditional Level I fieldwork. The purpose of this study was to understand the student perceptions of this learning experience. Focus group methodology was employed. Fifty-nine students participated in one of six focus groups. Six themes were identified through the data analysis process. These included challenges and rewards of effective communication, learning to think like an OT, a greater understanding and focus on occupations, developing skills in cultural understanding and advocacy, gaining confidence through doing, and the logistical challenges of getting everyone on the same page. These themes supported that students viewed non-traditional Level I fieldwork paired with structured classroom learning activities positively. A pattern across all themes was that students learned because they were able to make mistakes, reflect on them, and change their action. Limitations include that student perceptions are only one aspect of understanding the impact of learning experiences; therefore further study is needed.
topic Non-traditional level I fieldwork
occupational therapy education
cultural competence
qualitative focus group
url https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2017.010206
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahnielsen studentperceptionsofnontraditionallevelifieldwork
AT janetsjedlicka studentperceptionsofnontraditionallevelifieldwork
AT debrahanson studentperceptionsofnontraditionallevelifieldwork
AT lavonnefox studentperceptionsofnontraditionallevelifieldwork
AT cheriegraves studentperceptionsofnontraditionallevelifieldwork
_version_ 1725821711499132928