Inhibitory Effects of Biomass Degradation Products on Ethanol Fermentation and a Strategy to Overcome Them

The influence of buffers, as well as inhibitors such as formic acid, furfural, HMF, guaiacol, and vanillin, on ethanol formation was investigated. Compared to phosphoric buffer, the acetic and citric buffers were less inhibitory on ethanol fermentation. The addition of formic acid (2.5 g/L) to the b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shiyu Fu, Jinfeng Hu, Hao Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North Carolina State University 2014-06-01
Series:BioResources
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_09_3_4323_Fu_Inhibitory_Biomass_Degradation
id doaj-5c02ef4604514362851bdd5d2b6e09d5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5c02ef4604514362851bdd5d2b6e09d52020-11-24T23:41:49ZengNorth Carolina State UniversityBioResources1930-21261930-21262014-06-01934323433510.15376/biores.9.3.4323-4335Inhibitory Effects of Biomass Degradation Products on Ethanol Fermentation and a Strategy to Overcome ThemShiyu Fu0Jinfeng Hu1Hao Liu2State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, South China University of TechnologyState Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, South China University of TechnologyState Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, South China University of TechnologyThe influence of buffers, as well as inhibitors such as formic acid, furfural, HMF, guaiacol, and vanillin, on ethanol formation was investigated. Compared to phosphoric buffer, the acetic and citric buffers were less inhibitory on ethanol fermentation. The addition of formic acid (2.5 g/L) to the buffer reduced the ethanol yield by 8%. Guaiacol (3 g/L) and vanillin (2.5 g/L) decreased ethanol production by 50% and 20%, respectively. Furfural and HMF delayed the yeast fermentation without reducing the total yield. The fermentation was seriously inhibited by the mixture of furfural (1 g/L), HMF (1 g/L), formic acid (1 g/L), vanillin (1 g/L), and guaiacol (1 g/L). The ethanol yield of the fermentation based on enzymatic hydrolyzate from treated biomass was 82%. The addition of 1 g/L MgSO4 as a shielding protector rehabilitated nearly 100% of the total yield.http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_09_3_4323_Fu_Inhibitory_Biomass_DegradationEthanolFermentationInhibitorsShielding agentsRehabilitation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shiyu Fu
Jinfeng Hu
Hao Liu
spellingShingle Shiyu Fu
Jinfeng Hu
Hao Liu
Inhibitory Effects of Biomass Degradation Products on Ethanol Fermentation and a Strategy to Overcome Them
BioResources
Ethanol
Fermentation
Inhibitors
Shielding agents
Rehabilitation
author_facet Shiyu Fu
Jinfeng Hu
Hao Liu
author_sort Shiyu Fu
title Inhibitory Effects of Biomass Degradation Products on Ethanol Fermentation and a Strategy to Overcome Them
title_short Inhibitory Effects of Biomass Degradation Products on Ethanol Fermentation and a Strategy to Overcome Them
title_full Inhibitory Effects of Biomass Degradation Products on Ethanol Fermentation and a Strategy to Overcome Them
title_fullStr Inhibitory Effects of Biomass Degradation Products on Ethanol Fermentation and a Strategy to Overcome Them
title_full_unstemmed Inhibitory Effects of Biomass Degradation Products on Ethanol Fermentation and a Strategy to Overcome Them
title_sort inhibitory effects of biomass degradation products on ethanol fermentation and a strategy to overcome them
publisher North Carolina State University
series BioResources
issn 1930-2126
1930-2126
publishDate 2014-06-01
description The influence of buffers, as well as inhibitors such as formic acid, furfural, HMF, guaiacol, and vanillin, on ethanol formation was investigated. Compared to phosphoric buffer, the acetic and citric buffers were less inhibitory on ethanol fermentation. The addition of formic acid (2.5 g/L) to the buffer reduced the ethanol yield by 8%. Guaiacol (3 g/L) and vanillin (2.5 g/L) decreased ethanol production by 50% and 20%, respectively. Furfural and HMF delayed the yeast fermentation without reducing the total yield. The fermentation was seriously inhibited by the mixture of furfural (1 g/L), HMF (1 g/L), formic acid (1 g/L), vanillin (1 g/L), and guaiacol (1 g/L). The ethanol yield of the fermentation based on enzymatic hydrolyzate from treated biomass was 82%. The addition of 1 g/L MgSO4 as a shielding protector rehabilitated nearly 100% of the total yield.
topic Ethanol
Fermentation
Inhibitors
Shielding agents
Rehabilitation
url http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_09_3_4323_Fu_Inhibitory_Biomass_Degradation
work_keys_str_mv AT shiyufu inhibitoryeffectsofbiomassdegradationproductsonethanolfermentationandastrategytoovercomethem
AT jinfenghu inhibitoryeffectsofbiomassdegradationproductsonethanolfermentationandastrategytoovercomethem
AT haoliu inhibitoryeffectsofbiomassdegradationproductsonethanolfermentationandastrategytoovercomethem
_version_ 1725505289513336832