Prosodic cues to syntatic structures in speech production

<p>Children’s initial syntactic acquisition tasks include finding clausal and phrasal units from continuous speech stream and assigning words to grammatical categories. This study inquires if prosodic cues exist in adult speech and mark syntactic units. Participants were Quebec-French speakers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Massicotte-Laforge, Andréane Melaçon, Rushen Shi
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro 2015-08-01
Series:Revista Linguística
Online Access:https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rl/article/view/4623
id doaj-5bfdb4ab3e014e448b50ba1c5ac68e9f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5bfdb4ab3e014e448b50ba1c5ac68e9f2020-11-25T00:26:48ZporUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRevista Linguística1808-835X2238-975X2015-08-011113222Prosodic cues to syntatic structures in speech productionSarah Massicotte-Laforge0Andréane Melaçon1Rushen Shi2UQAMUQAMUQAM<p>Children’s initial syntactic acquisition tasks include finding clausal and phrasal units from continuous speech stream and assigning words to grammatical categories. This study inquires if prosodic cues exist in adult speech and mark syntactic units. Participants were Quebec-French speakers. In Experiment 1 participants read Determiner+Noun and Pronoun+Verb utterances. Determiners and pronouns were French words. Nouns and verbs were pseudo-words (e.g., <em>mige</em>, <em>krale</em>, <em>vare</em>) counterbalanced in their occurrences in the utterances. Their prosodic properties (duration, pitch, intensity) were measured. Results showed that the two categories did not differ in prosody: noun versus verb productions of<br />these pseudo-words were equivalent. Experiment 2 tested whether larger utterances were produced with prosodic cues supporting different grammatical categories and phrasal groupings. The same pseudo-words were the final words (counterbalanced) in 1) [Determiner+Adjective+Noun] and 2)[[Determiner+Noun]+[Verb]] structures. The second word in both structures was <em>felli</em>. Results showed that the last word as nouns versus verbs differed significantly in duration, pitch and intensity. Moreover, the initial consonant of verb productions was longer, with a distinct preceding pause. The second word in (2) exhibited categorical and boundary cues, differing from the second word in (1) in duration, pitch and intensity. We suggest that these acoustic cues may help infants first parse larger utterances and then acquire the syntactic properties of phrases and words based on their distribution.</p><p>DOI: 10.17074/2238-975X.2015v11n1p85</p>https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rl/article/view/4623
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah Massicotte-Laforge
Andréane Melaçon
Rushen Shi
spellingShingle Sarah Massicotte-Laforge
Andréane Melaçon
Rushen Shi
Prosodic cues to syntatic structures in speech production
Revista Linguística
author_facet Sarah Massicotte-Laforge
Andréane Melaçon
Rushen Shi
author_sort Sarah Massicotte-Laforge
title Prosodic cues to syntatic structures in speech production
title_short Prosodic cues to syntatic structures in speech production
title_full Prosodic cues to syntatic structures in speech production
title_fullStr Prosodic cues to syntatic structures in speech production
title_full_unstemmed Prosodic cues to syntatic structures in speech production
title_sort prosodic cues to syntatic structures in speech production
publisher Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
series Revista Linguística
issn 1808-835X
2238-975X
publishDate 2015-08-01
description <p>Children’s initial syntactic acquisition tasks include finding clausal and phrasal units from continuous speech stream and assigning words to grammatical categories. This study inquires if prosodic cues exist in adult speech and mark syntactic units. Participants were Quebec-French speakers. In Experiment 1 participants read Determiner+Noun and Pronoun+Verb utterances. Determiners and pronouns were French words. Nouns and verbs were pseudo-words (e.g., <em>mige</em>, <em>krale</em>, <em>vare</em>) counterbalanced in their occurrences in the utterances. Their prosodic properties (duration, pitch, intensity) were measured. Results showed that the two categories did not differ in prosody: noun versus verb productions of<br />these pseudo-words were equivalent. Experiment 2 tested whether larger utterances were produced with prosodic cues supporting different grammatical categories and phrasal groupings. The same pseudo-words were the final words (counterbalanced) in 1) [Determiner+Adjective+Noun] and 2)[[Determiner+Noun]+[Verb]] structures. The second word in both structures was <em>felli</em>. Results showed that the last word as nouns versus verbs differed significantly in duration, pitch and intensity. Moreover, the initial consonant of verb productions was longer, with a distinct preceding pause. The second word in (2) exhibited categorical and boundary cues, differing from the second word in (1) in duration, pitch and intensity. We suggest that these acoustic cues may help infants first parse larger utterances and then acquire the syntactic properties of phrases and words based on their distribution.</p><p>DOI: 10.17074/2238-975X.2015v11n1p85</p>
url https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rl/article/view/4623
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahmassicottelaforge prosodiccuestosyntaticstructuresinspeechproduction
AT andreanemelacon prosodiccuestosyntaticstructuresinspeechproduction
AT rushenshi prosodiccuestosyntaticstructuresinspeechproduction
_version_ 1725342475689656320