The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora

Purpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora.Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cadav...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shane Hanzlik, Andrew J. Riff, Thomas H. Wuerz, Michael Abdulian, Danielle Gurin, Shane J. Nho, Michael J. Salata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Surgery
Subjects:
hip
FAI
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2020.588535/full
id doaj-5bfa2332b6994180b24c2e66db3a4338
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5bfa2332b6994180b24c2e66db3a43382021-01-21T10:05:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2021-01-01710.3389/fsurg.2020.588535588535The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric FemoraShane Hanzlik0Andrew J. Riff1Thomas H. Wuerz2Michael Abdulian3Danielle Gurin4Shane J. Nho5Michael J. Salata6Department of Orthopaedics, UH Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United StatesRush University Medical Center, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, United StatesSports and Orthopaedic Specialists, Edina, MN, United StatesGlendale Orthopaedics, Glendale, CA, United StatesCleveland Clinic South Pointe, Warrensville Heights, OH, United StatesRush University Medical Center, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Orthopaedics, UH Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United StatesPurpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora.Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cadaveric femora from the Hamann–Todd Osteological Collection from the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Any asphericity >2 mm from the anterior femoral neck line was classified as a cam lesion. Once lesions had been inspected, the prevalence in the population, prevalence by gender, and prevalence of bilateral deformity were determined. Additionally, each lesion was measured and localized to a specific quadrant on the femoral neck based upon location of maximal deformity.Results: Cam lesions were noted in 33% of males and 20% of females. Eighty percent of patients with a cam lesion had bilateral lesions. When stratified by location of maximal deformity, 90.9% of lesions were in the anterosuperior quadrant and 9.1% were in the anteroinferior quadrants. The average lesion measured 17 mm long × 24 mm wide × 6 mm thick in men and 14 mm × 22 mm × 4 mm in women (p < 0.05).Conclusions: The population prevalence of cam deformity determined by direct visualization in cadavers may be higher than has been suggested in studies utilizing imaging modalities.Level of Evidence : Level II, diagnostic study.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2020.588535/fullhipFAIfemoroacetabular impingementhip arthroscopycadaveric
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shane Hanzlik
Andrew J. Riff
Thomas H. Wuerz
Michael Abdulian
Danielle Gurin
Shane J. Nho
Michael J. Salata
spellingShingle Shane Hanzlik
Andrew J. Riff
Thomas H. Wuerz
Michael Abdulian
Danielle Gurin
Shane J. Nho
Michael J. Salata
The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
Frontiers in Surgery
hip
FAI
femoroacetabular impingement
hip arthroscopy
cadaveric
author_facet Shane Hanzlik
Andrew J. Riff
Thomas H. Wuerz
Michael Abdulian
Danielle Gurin
Shane J. Nho
Michael J. Salata
author_sort Shane Hanzlik
title The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
title_short The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
title_full The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
title_fullStr The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
title_full_unstemmed The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
title_sort prevalence of cam morphology: a cross-sectional evaluation of 3,558 cadaveric femora
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Surgery
issn 2296-875X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora.Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cadaveric femora from the Hamann–Todd Osteological Collection from the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Any asphericity >2 mm from the anterior femoral neck line was classified as a cam lesion. Once lesions had been inspected, the prevalence in the population, prevalence by gender, and prevalence of bilateral deformity were determined. Additionally, each lesion was measured and localized to a specific quadrant on the femoral neck based upon location of maximal deformity.Results: Cam lesions were noted in 33% of males and 20% of females. Eighty percent of patients with a cam lesion had bilateral lesions. When stratified by location of maximal deformity, 90.9% of lesions were in the anterosuperior quadrant and 9.1% were in the anteroinferior quadrants. The average lesion measured 17 mm long × 24 mm wide × 6 mm thick in men and 14 mm × 22 mm × 4 mm in women (p < 0.05).Conclusions: The population prevalence of cam deformity determined by direct visualization in cadavers may be higher than has been suggested in studies utilizing imaging modalities.Level of Evidence : Level II, diagnostic study.
topic hip
FAI
femoroacetabular impingement
hip arthroscopy
cadaveric
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2020.588535/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shanehanzlik theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT andrewjriff theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT thomashwuerz theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT michaelabdulian theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT daniellegurin theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT shanejnho theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT michaeljsalata theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT shanehanzlik prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT andrewjriff prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT thomashwuerz prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT michaelabdulian prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT daniellegurin prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT shanejnho prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
AT michaeljsalata prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora
_version_ 1724330023523975168