The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora
Purpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora.Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cadav...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2020.588535/full |
id |
doaj-5bfa2332b6994180b24c2e66db3a4338 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5bfa2332b6994180b24c2e66db3a43382021-01-21T10:05:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Surgery2296-875X2021-01-01710.3389/fsurg.2020.588535588535The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric FemoraShane Hanzlik0Andrew J. Riff1Thomas H. Wuerz2Michael Abdulian3Danielle Gurin4Shane J. Nho5Michael J. Salata6Department of Orthopaedics, UH Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United StatesRush University Medical Center, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, United StatesSports and Orthopaedic Specialists, Edina, MN, United StatesGlendale Orthopaedics, Glendale, CA, United StatesCleveland Clinic South Pointe, Warrensville Heights, OH, United StatesRush University Medical Center, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Orthopaedics, UH Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United StatesPurpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora.Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cadaveric femora from the Hamann–Todd Osteological Collection from the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Any asphericity >2 mm from the anterior femoral neck line was classified as a cam lesion. Once lesions had been inspected, the prevalence in the population, prevalence by gender, and prevalence of bilateral deformity were determined. Additionally, each lesion was measured and localized to a specific quadrant on the femoral neck based upon location of maximal deformity.Results: Cam lesions were noted in 33% of males and 20% of females. Eighty percent of patients with a cam lesion had bilateral lesions. When stratified by location of maximal deformity, 90.9% of lesions were in the anterosuperior quadrant and 9.1% were in the anteroinferior quadrants. The average lesion measured 17 mm long × 24 mm wide × 6 mm thick in men and 14 mm × 22 mm × 4 mm in women (p < 0.05).Conclusions: The population prevalence of cam deformity determined by direct visualization in cadavers may be higher than has been suggested in studies utilizing imaging modalities.Level of Evidence : Level II, diagnostic study.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2020.588535/fullhipFAIfemoroacetabular impingementhip arthroscopycadaveric |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shane Hanzlik Andrew J. Riff Thomas H. Wuerz Michael Abdulian Danielle Gurin Shane J. Nho Michael J. Salata |
spellingShingle |
Shane Hanzlik Andrew J. Riff Thomas H. Wuerz Michael Abdulian Danielle Gurin Shane J. Nho Michael J. Salata The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora Frontiers in Surgery hip FAI femoroacetabular impingement hip arthroscopy cadaveric |
author_facet |
Shane Hanzlik Andrew J. Riff Thomas H. Wuerz Michael Abdulian Danielle Gurin Shane J. Nho Michael J. Salata |
author_sort |
Shane Hanzlik |
title |
The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora |
title_short |
The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora |
title_full |
The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora |
title_fullStr |
The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Prevalence of Cam Morphology: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of 3,558 Cadaveric Femora |
title_sort |
prevalence of cam morphology: a cross-sectional evaluation of 3,558 cadaveric femora |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Surgery |
issn |
2296-875X |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Purpose: We sought to determine (1) the prevalence of cam deformity in the population and that of bilateral cam deformity, (2) the typical location of a cam lesion, and (3) the typical size of a cam lesion by direct visualization in cadaveric femora.Methods: Two observers inspected 3,558 human cadaveric femora from the Hamann–Todd Osteological Collection from the Cleveland Museum of Natural History. Any asphericity >2 mm from the anterior femoral neck line was classified as a cam lesion. Once lesions had been inspected, the prevalence in the population, prevalence by gender, and prevalence of bilateral deformity were determined. Additionally, each lesion was measured and localized to a specific quadrant on the femoral neck based upon location of maximal deformity.Results: Cam lesions were noted in 33% of males and 20% of females. Eighty percent of patients with a cam lesion had bilateral lesions. When stratified by location of maximal deformity, 90.9% of lesions were in the anterosuperior quadrant and 9.1% were in the anteroinferior quadrants. The average lesion measured 17 mm long × 24 mm wide × 6 mm thick in men and 14 mm × 22 mm × 4 mm in women (p < 0.05).Conclusions: The population prevalence of cam deformity determined by direct visualization in cadavers may be higher than has been suggested in studies utilizing imaging modalities.Level of Evidence : Level II, diagnostic study. |
topic |
hip FAI femoroacetabular impingement hip arthroscopy cadaveric |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2020.588535/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shanehanzlik theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT andrewjriff theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT thomashwuerz theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT michaelabdulian theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT daniellegurin theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT shanejnho theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT michaeljsalata theprevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT shanehanzlik prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT andrewjriff prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT thomashwuerz prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT michaelabdulian prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT daniellegurin prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT shanejnho prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora AT michaeljsalata prevalenceofcammorphologyacrosssectionalevaluationof3558cadavericfemora |
_version_ |
1724330023523975168 |