Models of necessity
The way chemists represent chemical structures as two-dimensional sketches made up of atoms and bonds, simplifying the complex three-dimensional molecules comprising nuclei and electrons of the quantum mechanical description, is the everyday language of chemistry. This language uses models, particul...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Beilstein-Institut
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.16.137 |
id |
doaj-5bf14e4ad74d44e5ad09be7fb418fa42 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5bf14e4ad74d44e5ad09be7fb418fa422021-04-02T09:27:55ZengBeilstein-InstitutBeilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry1860-53972020-07-011611649166110.3762/bjoc.16.1371860-5397-16-137Models of necessityTimothy Clark0Martin G. Hicks1Computer-Chemistry-Center, Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nägelsbachstr. 25, 91052 Erlangen, GermanyBeilstein-Institut, Trakehner Str. 7–9, 60487 Frankfurt am Main, GermanyThe way chemists represent chemical structures as two-dimensional sketches made up of atoms and bonds, simplifying the complex three-dimensional molecules comprising nuclei and electrons of the quantum mechanical description, is the everyday language of chemistry. This language uses models, particularly of bonding, that are not contained in the quantum mechanical description of chemical systems, but has been used to derive machine-readable formats for storing and manipulating chemical structures in digital computers. This language is fuzzy and varies from chemist to chemist but has been astonishingly successful and perhaps contributes with its fuzziness to the success of chemistry. It is this creative imagination of chemical structures that has been fundamental to the cognition of chemistry and has allowed thought experiments to take place. Within the everyday language, the model nature of these concepts is not always clear to practicing chemists, so that controversial discussions about the merits of alternative models often arise. However, the extensive use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in chemistry, with the aim of being able to make reliable predictions, will require that these models be extended to cover all relevant properties and characteristics of chemical systems. This, in turn, imposes conditions such as completeness, compactness, computational efficiency and non-redundancy on the extensions to the almost universal Lewis and VSEPR bonding models. Thus, AI and ML are likely to be important in rationalizing, extending and standardizing chemical bonding models. This will not affect the everyday language of chemistry but may help to understand the unique basis of chemical language.https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.16.137chemical bondingchemical ontologieschemical structure formatschemical structure representationchemical structure modelslanguage of chemistryquantum chemistry |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Timothy Clark Martin G. Hicks |
spellingShingle |
Timothy Clark Martin G. Hicks Models of necessity Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry chemical bonding chemical ontologies chemical structure formats chemical structure representation chemical structure models language of chemistry quantum chemistry |
author_facet |
Timothy Clark Martin G. Hicks |
author_sort |
Timothy Clark |
title |
Models of necessity |
title_short |
Models of necessity |
title_full |
Models of necessity |
title_fullStr |
Models of necessity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Models of necessity |
title_sort |
models of necessity |
publisher |
Beilstein-Institut |
series |
Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry |
issn |
1860-5397 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
The way chemists represent chemical structures as two-dimensional sketches made up of atoms and bonds, simplifying the complex three-dimensional molecules comprising nuclei and electrons of the quantum mechanical description, is the everyday language of chemistry. This language uses models, particularly of bonding, that are not contained in the quantum mechanical description of chemical systems, but has been used to derive machine-readable formats for storing and manipulating chemical structures in digital computers. This language is fuzzy and varies from chemist to chemist but has been astonishingly successful and perhaps contributes with its fuzziness to the success of chemistry. It is this creative imagination of chemical structures that has been fundamental to the cognition of chemistry and has allowed thought experiments to take place. Within the everyday language, the model nature of these concepts is not always clear to practicing chemists, so that controversial discussions about the merits of alternative models often arise. However, the extensive use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in chemistry, with the aim of being able to make reliable predictions, will require that these models be extended to cover all relevant properties and characteristics of chemical systems. This, in turn, imposes conditions such as completeness, compactness, computational efficiency and non-redundancy on the extensions to the almost universal Lewis and VSEPR bonding models. Thus, AI and ML are likely to be important in rationalizing, extending and standardizing chemical bonding models. This will not affect the everyday language of chemistry but may help to understand the unique basis of chemical language. |
topic |
chemical bonding chemical ontologies chemical structure formats chemical structure representation chemical structure models language of chemistry quantum chemistry |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.16.137 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT timothyclark modelsofnecessity AT martinghicks modelsofnecessity |
_version_ |
1724169309247242240 |