Romanian political symbolism: between populism and cynism?
The argumentation I intend to develop in this paper aims to show that, being not a feature that belongs exclusively to totalitarian regimes, ideology represents an epistemic tool which may be used to discern the manner in which the construction of symbolic violence develops in any society be it ope...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Facultatea de Stiinte Politice, SNSPA
2013-04-01
|
Series: | Sfera Politicii |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sferapoliticii.ro/sfera/174/art11-Copilas.php |
id |
doaj-5bf0a787516d4f879a069c38e3f4d320 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5bf0a787516d4f879a069c38e3f4d3202020-12-02T11:56:52ZengFacultatea de Stiinte Politice, SNSPASfera Politicii1221-67202013-04-01XXI174 (2)107120Romanian political symbolism: between populism and cynism?Emanuel CopilașThe argumentation I intend to develop in this paper aims to show that, being not a feature that belongs exclusively to totalitarian regimes, ideology represents an epistemic tool which may be used to discern the manner in which the construction of symbolic violence develops in any society be it open or closed. Taking this aspect into account, the methodological hypothesis underlying my approach claims that if we accept an integrated, positive manner of defining ideology we will be able to notice the heuristic opportunity to make explicit the part played by the symbolic imaginary in the configuration of the social space and, starting from here, to highlight the fact that symbolic violence is a constitutive presence in the establishment of political relationships.http://www.sferapoliticii.ro/sfera/174/art11-Copilas.phpideologypolitical theorysymbolic violencepowerdominationsocial imaginary |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Emanuel Copilaș |
spellingShingle |
Emanuel Copilaș Romanian political symbolism: between populism and cynism? Sfera Politicii ideology political theory symbolic violence power domination social imaginary |
author_facet |
Emanuel Copilaș |
author_sort |
Emanuel Copilaș |
title |
Romanian political symbolism: between populism and cynism? |
title_short |
Romanian political symbolism: between populism and cynism? |
title_full |
Romanian political symbolism: between populism and cynism? |
title_fullStr |
Romanian political symbolism: between populism and cynism? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Romanian political symbolism: between populism and cynism? |
title_sort |
romanian political symbolism: between populism and cynism? |
publisher |
Facultatea de Stiinte Politice, SNSPA |
series |
Sfera Politicii |
issn |
1221-6720 |
publishDate |
2013-04-01 |
description |
The argumentation I intend to develop in this paper aims to show that, being not a feature that belongs exclusively to totalitarian regimes, ideology represents an epistemic tool which may be used to discern the manner in which the construction of symbolic violence develops in any society be it open or closed. Taking this aspect into account, the methodological hypothesis underlying my approach claims that if we accept an integrated, positive manner of defining ideology we will be able to notice the heuristic opportunity to make explicit the part played by the symbolic imaginary in the configuration of the social space and, starting from here, to highlight the fact that symbolic violence is a constitutive presence in the establishment of political relationships. |
topic |
ideology political theory symbolic violence power domination social imaginary |
url |
http://www.sferapoliticii.ro/sfera/174/art11-Copilas.php |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emanuelcopilas romanianpoliticalsymbolismbetweenpopulismandcynism |
_version_ |
1724406871868047360 |