Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique

Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study, a total of 768 radiographs of mandibular first molars, 384 for males and 384 for females, taken at a private radiology center in Isfahan, were assessed for the presence of middle mesial canal based on the gender of the patients. All samples had been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohsen Hasheminia, Hamid Razavian, Ladan Khorrami, Hamid Mosleh, Sanaz Mohamadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Dental Research Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2021;volume=18;issue=1;spage=42;epage=42;aulast=Hasheminia
id doaj-5bc3cbc8e5814340995c8364382cf369
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5bc3cbc8e5814340995c8364382cf3692021-07-27T04:18:52ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDental Research Journal1735-33272008-02552021-01-01181424210.4103/1735-3327.318937Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography techniqueMohsen HasheminiaHamid RazavianLadan KhorramiHamid MoslehSanaz MohamadiMaterials and Methods: In this descriptive study, a total of 768 radiographs of mandibular first molars, 384 for males and 384 for females, taken at a private radiology center in Isfahan, were assessed for the presence of middle mesial canal based on the gender of the patients. All samples had been prepared by one CBCT machine. The images were evaluated by endodontists and radiologists. Then, the morphology of first molar mesial root canals was assessed by Vertucci classification, and the obtained results were analyzed by SPSS software using a Chi-square test. The comparison was considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. Results: Twenty-four samples (3.13%) had a middle mesial canal. The prevalence rates of the middle mesial canal in the females and males were found to be 9 and 15 (2.35% vs. 3.92%), respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference (P = 0.21). Of 24 teeth with middle mesial canal, 17 samples (70.8%) were of Type XII and 7 samples (29.2%) were of Type VIII. There was no statistically significant difference between genders with regard to the prevalence of different types of middle mesial canals (P = 0.19). Conclusion: The prevalence of the middle mesial canal was rather low in this study, and it is necessary to detect additional canals in the patients under root canal treatment.http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2021;volume=18;issue=1;spage=42;epage=42;aulast=Hasheminiacone-beam computed tomographyroot canal preparationroot canal therapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohsen Hasheminia
Hamid Razavian
Ladan Khorrami
Hamid Mosleh
Sanaz Mohamadi
spellingShingle Mohsen Hasheminia
Hamid Razavian
Ladan Khorrami
Hamid Mosleh
Sanaz Mohamadi
Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
Dental Research Journal
cone-beam computed tomography
root canal preparation
root canal therapy
author_facet Mohsen Hasheminia
Hamid Razavian
Ladan Khorrami
Hamid Mosleh
Sanaz Mohamadi
author_sort Mohsen Hasheminia
title Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
title_short Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
title_full Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
title_fullStr Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
title_sort prevalence of middle mesial canal in mandibular first molars using cone-beam computed tomography technique
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Dental Research Journal
issn 1735-3327
2008-0255
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study, a total of 768 radiographs of mandibular first molars, 384 for males and 384 for females, taken at a private radiology center in Isfahan, were assessed for the presence of middle mesial canal based on the gender of the patients. All samples had been prepared by one CBCT machine. The images were evaluated by endodontists and radiologists. Then, the morphology of first molar mesial root canals was assessed by Vertucci classification, and the obtained results were analyzed by SPSS software using a Chi-square test. The comparison was considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. Results: Twenty-four samples (3.13%) had a middle mesial canal. The prevalence rates of the middle mesial canal in the females and males were found to be 9 and 15 (2.35% vs. 3.92%), respectively, indicating no statistically significant difference (P = 0.21). Of 24 teeth with middle mesial canal, 17 samples (70.8%) were of Type XII and 7 samples (29.2%) were of Type VIII. There was no statistically significant difference between genders with regard to the prevalence of different types of middle mesial canals (P = 0.19). Conclusion: The prevalence of the middle mesial canal was rather low in this study, and it is necessary to detect additional canals in the patients under root canal treatment.
topic cone-beam computed tomography
root canal preparation
root canal therapy
url http://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2021;volume=18;issue=1;spage=42;epage=42;aulast=Hasheminia
work_keys_str_mv AT mohsenhasheminia prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique
AT hamidrazavian prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique
AT ladankhorrami prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique
AT hamidmosleh prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique
AT sanazmohamadi prevalenceofmiddlemesialcanalinmandibularfirstmolarsusingconebeamcomputedtomographytechnique
_version_ 1721280164038443008