Ethanol Disrupts Reactivated Contextual Conditioned Fear Memory: Behavioral and Histological Perspectives

Objective: This research study is an attempt to examine whether the administration ofethanol after memory reactivation would modulate subsequent expression of memory inrats. Additionally, we examined whether this administration alters the density of Cornu Ammonis(CA)1 and CA3 pyramidal and dentate g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iran Goudarzi, Mohammad Taghi Ghorbanian, Taghi Lashkar bluki, Kataneh Abrari, Mahmoud Elahdadi Salmani, Jafar Alijan-pour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Royan Institute (ACECR), Tehran 2012-01-01
Series:Cell Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://celljournal.org/library/upload/article/af_3463555524235535732332833234546345536443alijanpour.pdf
id doaj-5bb0a53aa920445e9f176f7601114562
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5bb0a53aa920445e9f176f76011145622020-11-25T01:49:00ZengRoyan Institute (ACECR), TehranCell Journal2228-58062228-58142012-01-01134265274Ethanol Disrupts Reactivated Contextual Conditioned Fear Memory: Behavioral and Histological Perspectives Iran GoudarziMohammad Taghi GhorbanianTaghi Lashkar blukiKataneh AbrariMahmoud Elahdadi SalmaniJafar Alijan-pourObjective: This research study is an attempt to examine whether the administration ofethanol after memory reactivation would modulate subsequent expression of memory inrats. Additionally, we examined whether this administration alters the density of Cornu Ammonis(CA)1 and CA3 pyramidal and dentate gyrus (DG) granule cells.Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, adult male Wistar rats (200-300 g)were trained in a fear conditioning system using two 1 second, 0.6 mA shocks with aninterval of 180 seconds. Twenty four hours later rats were returned to the chamber for 120seconds. Immediately after reactivation they were injected with ethanol (0.5, 1, 1.5 mg/kg) or saline. 1, 7 and 14 days after reactivation, rats were returned to the context for 5minutes. Seconds of freezing (absence of all movement except respiration) were scored.In the second experiment (described in the previous paragraph), after test 1, animalswere anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital and perfused transcardially with phosphatebuffer (10 minutes) and 4% paraformaldehyde (15 minutes). The brains were postfixed inphosphate-buffered 4% paraformaldehyde (24 hours) and 30% sucrose. 10-μm sectionswere stained with cresyl violet.Data were analyzed by 1-and 2-way ANOVA for repeated measurements by means ofSPSS 16.0. Tukey’s post hoc test was performed to determine the source of detectedsignificant differences. P <0 .05 were considered significant. Data are presented as mean± SEM.Results: Findings from the first experiment indicated that ethanol at a dose of 1.5 mg/kgsignificantly impaired recall of memory only in the first test. The density of CA1 and CA3pyramidal and DG granule cells in the ethanol group was decreased (p< 0.01) comparedwith control group respectively 43.7%, 35.8%, and 37.8.Conclusion: The data demonstrate that ethanol exposure impairs post retrieval processes.Moreover, ethanol decreases the density of CA1, CA3 and DG cells. Presumably itwould be a correlation between our behavioral and histological results.http://celljournal.org/library/upload/article/af_3463555524235535732332833234546345536443alijanpour.pdfHippocampusReconsolidationConditioningEthanol
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iran Goudarzi
Mohammad Taghi Ghorbanian
Taghi Lashkar bluki
Kataneh Abrari
Mahmoud Elahdadi Salmani
Jafar Alijan-pour
spellingShingle Iran Goudarzi
Mohammad Taghi Ghorbanian
Taghi Lashkar bluki
Kataneh Abrari
Mahmoud Elahdadi Salmani
Jafar Alijan-pour
Ethanol Disrupts Reactivated Contextual Conditioned Fear Memory: Behavioral and Histological Perspectives
Cell Journal
Hippocampus
Reconsolidation
Conditioning
Ethanol
author_facet Iran Goudarzi
Mohammad Taghi Ghorbanian
Taghi Lashkar bluki
Kataneh Abrari
Mahmoud Elahdadi Salmani
Jafar Alijan-pour
author_sort Iran Goudarzi
title Ethanol Disrupts Reactivated Contextual Conditioned Fear Memory: Behavioral and Histological Perspectives
title_short Ethanol Disrupts Reactivated Contextual Conditioned Fear Memory: Behavioral and Histological Perspectives
title_full Ethanol Disrupts Reactivated Contextual Conditioned Fear Memory: Behavioral and Histological Perspectives
title_fullStr Ethanol Disrupts Reactivated Contextual Conditioned Fear Memory: Behavioral and Histological Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Ethanol Disrupts Reactivated Contextual Conditioned Fear Memory: Behavioral and Histological Perspectives
title_sort ethanol disrupts reactivated contextual conditioned fear memory: behavioral and histological perspectives
publisher Royan Institute (ACECR), Tehran
series Cell Journal
issn 2228-5806
2228-5814
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Objective: This research study is an attempt to examine whether the administration ofethanol after memory reactivation would modulate subsequent expression of memory inrats. Additionally, we examined whether this administration alters the density of Cornu Ammonis(CA)1 and CA3 pyramidal and dentate gyrus (DG) granule cells.Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, adult male Wistar rats (200-300 g)were trained in a fear conditioning system using two 1 second, 0.6 mA shocks with aninterval of 180 seconds. Twenty four hours later rats were returned to the chamber for 120seconds. Immediately after reactivation they were injected with ethanol (0.5, 1, 1.5 mg/kg) or saline. 1, 7 and 14 days after reactivation, rats were returned to the context for 5minutes. Seconds of freezing (absence of all movement except respiration) were scored.In the second experiment (described in the previous paragraph), after test 1, animalswere anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital and perfused transcardially with phosphatebuffer (10 minutes) and 4% paraformaldehyde (15 minutes). The brains were postfixed inphosphate-buffered 4% paraformaldehyde (24 hours) and 30% sucrose. 10-μm sectionswere stained with cresyl violet.Data were analyzed by 1-and 2-way ANOVA for repeated measurements by means ofSPSS 16.0. Tukey’s post hoc test was performed to determine the source of detectedsignificant differences. P <0 .05 were considered significant. Data are presented as mean± SEM.Results: Findings from the first experiment indicated that ethanol at a dose of 1.5 mg/kgsignificantly impaired recall of memory only in the first test. The density of CA1 and CA3pyramidal and DG granule cells in the ethanol group was decreased (p< 0.01) comparedwith control group respectively 43.7%, 35.8%, and 37.8.Conclusion: The data demonstrate that ethanol exposure impairs post retrieval processes.Moreover, ethanol decreases the density of CA1, CA3 and DG cells. Presumably itwould be a correlation between our behavioral and histological results.
topic Hippocampus
Reconsolidation
Conditioning
Ethanol
url http://celljournal.org/library/upload/article/af_3463555524235535732332833234546345536443alijanpour.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT irangoudarzi ethanoldisruptsreactivatedcontextualconditionedfearmemorybehavioralandhistologicalperspectives
AT mohammadtaghighorbanian ethanoldisruptsreactivatedcontextualconditionedfearmemorybehavioralandhistologicalperspectives
AT taghilashkarbluki ethanoldisruptsreactivatedcontextualconditionedfearmemorybehavioralandhistologicalperspectives
AT katanehabrari ethanoldisruptsreactivatedcontextualconditionedfearmemorybehavioralandhistologicalperspectives
AT mahmoudelahdadisalmani ethanoldisruptsreactivatedcontextualconditionedfearmemorybehavioralandhistologicalperspectives
AT jafaralijanpour ethanoldisruptsreactivatedcontextualconditionedfearmemorybehavioralandhistologicalperspectives
_version_ 1725009497913556992