Evaluating the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the PHQ-9 between American Indian/Alaska Native adults and diverse racial and ethnic groups
Background: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a self-reported depression screening instrument for measurement-based care (MBC), may have cross-cultural measurement invariance (MI) with a regional group of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) and non-Hispanic White adults. However, to ensu...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Affective Disorders Reports |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915321000482 |
id |
doaj-5b8df114aa1d4bb0a42f399393379414 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5b8df114aa1d4bb0a42f3993933794142021-04-22T13:42:38ZengElsevierJournal of Affective Disorders Reports2666-91532021-04-014100121Evaluating the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the PHQ-9 between American Indian/Alaska Native adults and diverse racial and ethnic groupsMelissa L. Harry0R. Yates Coley1Stephen C. Waring2Gregory E. Simon3Essentia Health, Essentia Institute of Rural Health, 502 East Second Street, Duluth, MN 55805, United States; Corresponding author.Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600 Seattle, WA 98101-1466, United StatesEssentia Health, Essentia Institute of Rural Health, 502 East Second Street, Duluth, MN 55805, United StatesKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600 Seattle, WA 98101-1466, United StatesBackground: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a self-reported depression screening instrument for measurement-based care (MBC), may have cross-cultural measurement invariance (MI) with a regional group of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) and non-Hispanic White adults. However, to ensure health equity, research was needed on the cross-cultural MI of the PHQ-9 between other groups of AI/AN peoples and diverse populations. Methods: We assessed the MI of the one-factor PHQ-9 model and five previously identified two-factor models between non-Hispanic AI/AN adults (ages 18–64) from healthcare systems A (n = 1759) and B (n = 2701) using secondary data and robust maximum likelihood estimation. We then tested models for full or partial MI between either combined or separate AI/AN groups, respectively, and Hispanic (n = 7974), White (n = 7,974), Asian (n = 6988), Black (n = 6213), and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (n = 1370) adults from healthcare system B. All had mental health or substance use disorder diagnoses and were seen in behavioral health or primary care settings from 1/1/2009 to 9/30/2017. Results: The one-factor PHQ-9 model was partially invariant, with two-factor models partially, or in one case fully, invariant between AI/AN groups. The one-factor model and three two-factor models were partially invariant between all seven groups, while a two-factor model was fully invariant and another partially invariant between a combined AI/AN group and other racial and ethnic groups. Conclusions: Achieving health equity in MBC requires ensuring the cross-cultural validity of measurement tools. Before comparing mean scores, PHQ-9 models should be assessed for individual racial and ethnic group fit for adults with mental health or substance use disorders.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915321000482American Indian/Alaska NativeCross-culturalHealth equityMeasurement equivalenceMeasurement invariancePatient Health Questionnaire-9 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Melissa L. Harry R. Yates Coley Stephen C. Waring Gregory E. Simon |
spellingShingle |
Melissa L. Harry R. Yates Coley Stephen C. Waring Gregory E. Simon Evaluating the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the PHQ-9 between American Indian/Alaska Native adults and diverse racial and ethnic groups Journal of Affective Disorders Reports American Indian/Alaska Native Cross-cultural Health equity Measurement equivalence Measurement invariance Patient Health Questionnaire-9 |
author_facet |
Melissa L. Harry R. Yates Coley Stephen C. Waring Gregory E. Simon |
author_sort |
Melissa L. Harry |
title |
Evaluating the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the PHQ-9 between American Indian/Alaska Native adults and diverse racial and ethnic groups |
title_short |
Evaluating the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the PHQ-9 between American Indian/Alaska Native adults and diverse racial and ethnic groups |
title_full |
Evaluating the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the PHQ-9 between American Indian/Alaska Native adults and diverse racial and ethnic groups |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the PHQ-9 between American Indian/Alaska Native adults and diverse racial and ethnic groups |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the PHQ-9 between American Indian/Alaska Native adults and diverse racial and ethnic groups |
title_sort |
evaluating the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the phq-9 between american indian/alaska native adults and diverse racial and ethnic groups |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports |
issn |
2666-9153 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Background: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a self-reported depression screening instrument for measurement-based care (MBC), may have cross-cultural measurement invariance (MI) with a regional group of American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) and non-Hispanic White adults. However, to ensure health equity, research was needed on the cross-cultural MI of the PHQ-9 between other groups of AI/AN peoples and diverse populations. Methods: We assessed the MI of the one-factor PHQ-9 model and five previously identified two-factor models between non-Hispanic AI/AN adults (ages 18–64) from healthcare systems A (n = 1759) and B (n = 2701) using secondary data and robust maximum likelihood estimation. We then tested models for full or partial MI between either combined or separate AI/AN groups, respectively, and Hispanic (n = 7974), White (n = 7,974), Asian (n = 6988), Black (n = 6213), and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (n = 1370) adults from healthcare system B. All had mental health or substance use disorder diagnoses and were seen in behavioral health or primary care settings from 1/1/2009 to 9/30/2017. Results: The one-factor PHQ-9 model was partially invariant, with two-factor models partially, or in one case fully, invariant between AI/AN groups. The one-factor model and three two-factor models were partially invariant between all seven groups, while a two-factor model was fully invariant and another partially invariant between a combined AI/AN group and other racial and ethnic groups. Conclusions: Achieving health equity in MBC requires ensuring the cross-cultural validity of measurement tools. Before comparing mean scores, PHQ-9 models should be assessed for individual racial and ethnic group fit for adults with mental health or substance use disorders. |
topic |
American Indian/Alaska Native Cross-cultural Health equity Measurement equivalence Measurement invariance Patient Health Questionnaire-9 |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915321000482 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT melissalharry evaluatingthecrossculturalmeasurementinvarianceofthephq9betweenamericanindianalaskanativeadultsanddiverseracialandethnicgroups AT ryatescoley evaluatingthecrossculturalmeasurementinvarianceofthephq9betweenamericanindianalaskanativeadultsanddiverseracialandethnicgroups AT stephencwaring evaluatingthecrossculturalmeasurementinvarianceofthephq9betweenamericanindianalaskanativeadultsanddiverseracialandethnicgroups AT gregoryesimon evaluatingthecrossculturalmeasurementinvarianceofthephq9betweenamericanindianalaskanativeadultsanddiverseracialandethnicgroups |
_version_ |
1721514127192489984 |