Epidural block and the pain cycle
A 68 year old female with carcinoma vulva, presented with severe unrelenting, burning pain in the vulval region. The pain was not controlled by dispersible Morphine 20 mg q4h, and a dose of 25 mg q4h produced intolerable side effects like nausea, vomiting and drowsiness, without additional pain reli...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Pain |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.indianjpain.org/article.asp?issn=0970-5333;year=2016;volume=30;issue=3;spage=209;epage=210;aulast=Page |
id |
doaj-5b7d07de6103482e858ba60db200fcfc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5b7d07de6103482e858ba60db200fcfc2020-11-24T20:41:23ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Pain0970-53332016-01-0130320921010.4103/0970-5333.198067Epidural block and the pain cycleNivedita PageVivek NirabhawaneRavindra GhooiA 68 year old female with carcinoma vulva, presented with severe unrelenting, burning pain in the vulval region. The pain was not controlled by dispersible Morphine 20 mg q4h, and a dose of 25 mg q4h produced intolerable side effects like nausea, vomiting and drowsiness, without additional pain relief. A ganglion impar could not be done due to altered anatomy. A lumbar epidural block with a catheter to deliver a continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at 2.0 ml/hour was initiated. She had excellent analgesia and she could be taken off morphine. Her epidural catheter dislodged in 3 days and could not be reinserted immediately. When we started her on morphine, her pain was well controlled with Morphine 5 mg q4h. We propose this increase in sensitivity to morphine to be due to breaking of the pain cycle with the epidural block.http://www.indianjpain.org/article.asp?issn=0970-5333;year=2016;volume=30;issue=3;spage=209;epage=210;aulast=PageCancer painepidural blockmorphinepain cycle |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nivedita Page Vivek Nirabhawane Ravindra Ghooi |
spellingShingle |
Nivedita Page Vivek Nirabhawane Ravindra Ghooi Epidural block and the pain cycle Indian Journal of Pain Cancer pain epidural block morphine pain cycle |
author_facet |
Nivedita Page Vivek Nirabhawane Ravindra Ghooi |
author_sort |
Nivedita Page |
title |
Epidural block and the pain cycle |
title_short |
Epidural block and the pain cycle |
title_full |
Epidural block and the pain cycle |
title_fullStr |
Epidural block and the pain cycle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epidural block and the pain cycle |
title_sort |
epidural block and the pain cycle |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Indian Journal of Pain |
issn |
0970-5333 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
A 68 year old female with carcinoma vulva, presented with severe unrelenting, burning pain in the vulval region. The pain was not controlled by dispersible Morphine 20 mg q4h, and a dose of 25 mg q4h produced intolerable side effects like nausea, vomiting and drowsiness, without additional pain relief. A ganglion impar could not be done due to altered anatomy. A lumbar epidural block with a catheter to deliver a continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at 2.0 ml/hour was initiated. She had excellent analgesia and she could be taken off morphine. Her epidural catheter dislodged in 3 days and could not be reinserted immediately. When we started her on morphine, her pain was well controlled with Morphine 5 mg q4h. We propose this increase in sensitivity to morphine to be due to breaking of the pain cycle with the epidural block. |
topic |
Cancer pain epidural block morphine pain cycle |
url |
http://www.indianjpain.org/article.asp?issn=0970-5333;year=2016;volume=30;issue=3;spage=209;epage=210;aulast=Page |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT niveditapage epiduralblockandthepaincycle AT viveknirabhawane epiduralblockandthepaincycle AT ravindraghooi epiduralblockandthepaincycle |
_version_ |
1716825330111479808 |