Can nanofluidic chemical release enable fast, high resolution neurotransmitter-based neurostimulation?
Artificial chemical stimulation could provide improvements over electrical neurostimulation. Physiological neurotransmission between neurons relies on the nanoscale release and propagation of specific chemical signals to spatially-localized receptors. Current knowledge of nanoscale fluid dynamics an...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2016.00138/full |
id |
doaj-5b7ce0218b754586997420b19404fb4c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5b7ce0218b754586997420b19404fb4c2020-11-24T23:16:30ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2016-03-011010.3389/fnins.2016.00138183890Can nanofluidic chemical release enable fast, high resolution neurotransmitter-based neurostimulation?Peter D Jones0Martin eStelzle1NMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of TübingenNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of TübingenArtificial chemical stimulation could provide improvements over electrical neurostimulation. Physiological neurotransmission between neurons relies on the nanoscale release and propagation of specific chemical signals to spatially-localized receptors. Current knowledge of nanoscale fluid dynamics and nanofluidic technology allows us to envision artificial mechanisms to achieve fast, high resolution neurotransmitter release. Substantial technological development is required to reach this goal. Nanofluidic technology — rather than microfluidic — will be necessary; this should come as no surprise given the nanofluidic nature of neurotransmission.This perspective reviews the state of the art of high resolution electrical neuroprostheses and their anticipated limitations. Chemical release rates from nanopores are compared to rates achieved at synapses and with iontophoresis. A review of microfluidic technology justifies the analysis that microfluidic control of chemical release would be insufficient. Novel nanofluidic mechanisms are discussed, and we propose that hydrophobic gating may allow control of chemical release suitable for mimicking neurotransmission. The limited understanding of hydrophobic gating in artificial nanopores and the challenges of fabrication and large-scale integration of nanofluidic components are emphasized. Development of suitable nanofluidic technology will require dedicated, long-term efforts over many years.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2016.00138/fullNeuroprosthesisneurotransmissionneurotransmittermicrofluidicartificial synapsenanopore |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peter D Jones Martin eStelzle |
spellingShingle |
Peter D Jones Martin eStelzle Can nanofluidic chemical release enable fast, high resolution neurotransmitter-based neurostimulation? Frontiers in Neuroscience Neuroprosthesis neurotransmission neurotransmitter microfluidic artificial synapse nanopore |
author_facet |
Peter D Jones Martin eStelzle |
author_sort |
Peter D Jones |
title |
Can nanofluidic chemical release enable fast, high resolution neurotransmitter-based neurostimulation? |
title_short |
Can nanofluidic chemical release enable fast, high resolution neurotransmitter-based neurostimulation? |
title_full |
Can nanofluidic chemical release enable fast, high resolution neurotransmitter-based neurostimulation? |
title_fullStr |
Can nanofluidic chemical release enable fast, high resolution neurotransmitter-based neurostimulation? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can nanofluidic chemical release enable fast, high resolution neurotransmitter-based neurostimulation? |
title_sort |
can nanofluidic chemical release enable fast, high resolution neurotransmitter-based neurostimulation? |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Neuroscience |
issn |
1662-453X |
publishDate |
2016-03-01 |
description |
Artificial chemical stimulation could provide improvements over electrical neurostimulation. Physiological neurotransmission between neurons relies on the nanoscale release and propagation of specific chemical signals to spatially-localized receptors. Current knowledge of nanoscale fluid dynamics and nanofluidic technology allows us to envision artificial mechanisms to achieve fast, high resolution neurotransmitter release. Substantial technological development is required to reach this goal. Nanofluidic technology — rather than microfluidic — will be necessary; this should come as no surprise given the nanofluidic nature of neurotransmission.This perspective reviews the state of the art of high resolution electrical neuroprostheses and their anticipated limitations. Chemical release rates from nanopores are compared to rates achieved at synapses and with iontophoresis. A review of microfluidic technology justifies the analysis that microfluidic control of chemical release would be insufficient. Novel nanofluidic mechanisms are discussed, and we propose that hydrophobic gating may allow control of chemical release suitable for mimicking neurotransmission. The limited understanding of hydrophobic gating in artificial nanopores and the challenges of fabrication and large-scale integration of nanofluidic components are emphasized. Development of suitable nanofluidic technology will require dedicated, long-term efforts over many years. |
topic |
Neuroprosthesis neurotransmission neurotransmitter microfluidic artificial synapse nanopore |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2016.00138/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peterdjones cannanofluidicchemicalreleaseenablefasthighresolutionneurotransmitterbasedneurostimulation AT martinestelzle cannanofluidicchemicalreleaseenablefasthighresolutionneurotransmitterbasedneurostimulation |
_version_ |
1725586991210299392 |