Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data

Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Previous studies on GBM biomarkers focused on the effect of the biomarkers on overall survival (OS). Until now, no study has been published that evaluates the performance of biomarkers for prognosing OS....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nan Hu, Haojie Cheng, Kevin Zhang, Randy Jensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-10-01
Series:Cancer Informatics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1176935117734844
id doaj-5b7279e039a0415691b249d6e274e8b4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b7279e039a0415691b249d6e274e8b42020-11-25T03:43:39ZengSAGE PublishingCancer Informatics1176-93512017-10-011610.1177/1176935117734844Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas DataNan Hu0Haojie Cheng1Kevin Zhang2Randy Jensen3Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USADepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USADepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USADepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USABackground: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Previous studies on GBM biomarkers focused on the effect of the biomarkers on overall survival (OS). Until now, no study has been published that evaluates the performance of biomarkers for prognosing OS. We examined the performance of microRNAs, gene expressions, gene signatures, and methylation that were previously identified to be prognostic. In addition, we investigated whether using clinical risk factors in combination with biomarkers can improve the prognostic performance. Methods: The Cancer Genome Atlas, which provides both biomarkers and OS information, was used in this study. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the prognostic accuracy. Results: For prognosis of OS by 2 years from diagnosis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of microRNAs, Mir21 and Mir222, was 0.550 and 0.625, respectively. When age was included in the risk prediction score of these biomarkers, the AUC increased to 0.719 and 0.701, respectively. The SAMSN1 gene expression attains an AUC of 0.563, and the “8-gene” signature identified by Bao achieves an AUC of 0.613. Conclusions: Although some biomarkers are significantly associated with OS, the ability of these biomarkers for prognosing OS events is limited. Incorporating clinical risk factors, such as age, can greatly improve the prognostic performance.https://doi.org/10.1177/1176935117734844
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nan Hu
Haojie Cheng
Kevin Zhang
Randy Jensen
spellingShingle Nan Hu
Haojie Cheng
Kevin Zhang
Randy Jensen
Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data
Cancer Informatics
author_facet Nan Hu
Haojie Cheng
Kevin Zhang
Randy Jensen
author_sort Nan Hu
title Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data
title_short Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data
title_full Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data
title_fullStr Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data
title_sort evaluating the prognostic accuracy of biomarkers for glioblastoma multiforme using the cancer genome atlas data
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Cancer Informatics
issn 1176-9351
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Previous studies on GBM biomarkers focused on the effect of the biomarkers on overall survival (OS). Until now, no study has been published that evaluates the performance of biomarkers for prognosing OS. We examined the performance of microRNAs, gene expressions, gene signatures, and methylation that were previously identified to be prognostic. In addition, we investigated whether using clinical risk factors in combination with biomarkers can improve the prognostic performance. Methods: The Cancer Genome Atlas, which provides both biomarkers and OS information, was used in this study. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the prognostic accuracy. Results: For prognosis of OS by 2 years from diagnosis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of microRNAs, Mir21 and Mir222, was 0.550 and 0.625, respectively. When age was included in the risk prediction score of these biomarkers, the AUC increased to 0.719 and 0.701, respectively. The SAMSN1 gene expression attains an AUC of 0.563, and the “8-gene” signature identified by Bao achieves an AUC of 0.613. Conclusions: Although some biomarkers are significantly associated with OS, the ability of these biomarkers for prognosing OS events is limited. Incorporating clinical risk factors, such as age, can greatly improve the prognostic performance.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1176935117734844
work_keys_str_mv AT nanhu evaluatingtheprognosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforglioblastomamultiformeusingthecancergenomeatlasdata
AT haojiecheng evaluatingtheprognosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforglioblastomamultiformeusingthecancergenomeatlasdata
AT kevinzhang evaluatingtheprognosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforglioblastomamultiformeusingthecancergenomeatlasdata
AT randyjensen evaluatingtheprognosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforglioblastomamultiformeusingthecancergenomeatlasdata
_version_ 1724518513376231424