A change in attitudes regarding the importance of climatic fluctuations

Having taken part in two symposia sponsored by the Geographical Society of Finland (1951 and 1976) on the influence of climatic variations and fluctuations on nature and the activities of man, the author is aware that a certain change in attitudes regarding the significance of the climate has ta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ilmari Hustich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Geographical Society of Finland 1978-01-01
Series:Fennia: International Journal of Geography
Online Access:https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/9219
id doaj-5b67604d50ca4922a313d17adeb2516c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5b67604d50ca4922a313d17adeb2516c2020-11-25T03:19:03ZengGeographical Society of FinlandFennia: International Journal of Geography1798-56171978-01-011501A change in attitudes regarding the importance of climatic fluctuationsIlmari Hustich0Swedish School of Economics, Helsinki Having taken part in two symposia sponsored by the Geographical Society of Finland (1951 and 1976) on the influence of climatic variations and fluctuations on nature and the activities of man, the author is aware that a certain change in attitudes regarding the significance of the climate has taken place among biogeographers in the period. Nowadays there seems to be a tendency to play down the influence of climatic variations on crops and growth phenomena, for instance. One reason for this may lie in the acceleration of technological advances, accompanied by rapid industrialization and urbanization. The whole land use pattern has changed over large areas in Finland, and new methods for primary organic production (in agriculture, fishing and forestry) have been introduced. No economist today would try to correlate fluctuations in the economy with variations in climate, as was the case only a few decades ago. We also talk more frequently about 'man‑made climate', although opinions regarding the increased carbon dioxide content of' the atmosphere, for instance, are as divergent today as they were 25 years ago. The author stresses the importance of the climatic hazard coefficient and evaluates the complexity of the ecoclimatic triangle. Man's influence on nature seems to have increased so much that it tends to obscure the continuing primary importance of the climate itself. https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/9219
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ilmari Hustich
spellingShingle Ilmari Hustich
A change in attitudes regarding the importance of climatic fluctuations
Fennia: International Journal of Geography
author_facet Ilmari Hustich
author_sort Ilmari Hustich
title A change in attitudes regarding the importance of climatic fluctuations
title_short A change in attitudes regarding the importance of climatic fluctuations
title_full A change in attitudes regarding the importance of climatic fluctuations
title_fullStr A change in attitudes regarding the importance of climatic fluctuations
title_full_unstemmed A change in attitudes regarding the importance of climatic fluctuations
title_sort change in attitudes regarding the importance of climatic fluctuations
publisher Geographical Society of Finland
series Fennia: International Journal of Geography
issn 1798-5617
publishDate 1978-01-01
description Having taken part in two symposia sponsored by the Geographical Society of Finland (1951 and 1976) on the influence of climatic variations and fluctuations on nature and the activities of man, the author is aware that a certain change in attitudes regarding the significance of the climate has taken place among biogeographers in the period. Nowadays there seems to be a tendency to play down the influence of climatic variations on crops and growth phenomena, for instance. One reason for this may lie in the acceleration of technological advances, accompanied by rapid industrialization and urbanization. The whole land use pattern has changed over large areas in Finland, and new methods for primary organic production (in agriculture, fishing and forestry) have been introduced. No economist today would try to correlate fluctuations in the economy with variations in climate, as was the case only a few decades ago. We also talk more frequently about 'man‑made climate', although opinions regarding the increased carbon dioxide content of' the atmosphere, for instance, are as divergent today as they were 25 years ago. The author stresses the importance of the climatic hazard coefficient and evaluates the complexity of the ecoclimatic triangle. Man's influence on nature seems to have increased so much that it tends to obscure the continuing primary importance of the climate itself.
url https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/9219
work_keys_str_mv AT ilmarihustich achangeinattitudesregardingtheimportanceofclimaticfluctuations
AT ilmarihustich changeinattitudesregardingtheimportanceofclimaticfluctuations
_version_ 1724624030683627520