Issues of biomedically assisted fertilization before the European Court of Human Rights
The development of biomedicine has led to the birth of the first test-tube baby in 1978, and that event gave enormous impetus for further development of biomedically assisted fertilization, but also for the development of supporting legislation. Biomedically assisted fertilization and its applicatio...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law
2011-01-01
|
Series: | Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2011/0550-21791103313B.pdf |
id |
doaj-5b6134aa74ab496c902f0a16211da9c8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5b6134aa74ab496c902f0a16211da9c82020-11-24T21:22:50ZengUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of LawZbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu0550-21792406-12552011-01-0145331333310.5937/zrpfns1103313B0550-21791103313BIssues of biomedically assisted fertilization before the European Court of Human RightsBordaš Bernadet0University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, Novi Sad, SerbiaThe development of biomedicine has led to the birth of the first test-tube baby in 1978, and that event gave enormous impetus for further development of biomedically assisted fertilization, but also for the development of supporting legislation. Biomedically assisted fertilization and its application raises sensitive social and moral issues, so states retain their sovereign rights in this area and enact rules and regulations that reflect their national legislative policy. Comparative studies across Europe show that national legal acts are in force in many countries, but differences exist and states persist on them. Legal regulation of biomedically assisted fertilization provides legal security for individuals who are subjected to it, making easier the legal protection in cases where individual rights are violated. This paper presents two recent judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, the subject matter of which are issues of biomedically assisted fertilization, where legal remedy is sought under Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Both judgments are in favor of the states against which complaints are filed by individuals: the Court ruled that national regulations have not violated the right to respect for the individual's private life.http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2011/0550-21791103313B.pdfbiomedically assisted fertilizationright to respect for private liferight to respect the decision to become a genetic parentright of couples to conceive a child and to use medically assisted fertilization |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bordaš Bernadet |
spellingShingle |
Bordaš Bernadet Issues of biomedically assisted fertilization before the European Court of Human Rights Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu biomedically assisted fertilization right to respect for private life right to respect the decision to become a genetic parent right of couples to conceive a child and to use medically assisted fertilization |
author_facet |
Bordaš Bernadet |
author_sort |
Bordaš Bernadet |
title |
Issues of biomedically assisted fertilization before the European Court of Human Rights |
title_short |
Issues of biomedically assisted fertilization before the European Court of Human Rights |
title_full |
Issues of biomedically assisted fertilization before the European Court of Human Rights |
title_fullStr |
Issues of biomedically assisted fertilization before the European Court of Human Rights |
title_full_unstemmed |
Issues of biomedically assisted fertilization before the European Court of Human Rights |
title_sort |
issues of biomedically assisted fertilization before the european court of human rights |
publisher |
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law |
series |
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu |
issn |
0550-2179 2406-1255 |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
The development of biomedicine has led to the birth of the first test-tube baby in 1978, and that event gave enormous impetus for further development of biomedically assisted fertilization, but also for the development of supporting legislation. Biomedically assisted fertilization and its application raises sensitive social and moral issues, so states retain their sovereign rights in this area and enact rules and regulations that reflect their national legislative policy. Comparative studies across Europe show that national legal acts are in force in many countries, but differences exist and states persist on them. Legal regulation of biomedically assisted fertilization provides legal security for individuals who are subjected to it, making easier the legal protection in cases where individual rights are violated. This paper presents two recent judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, the subject matter of which are issues of biomedically assisted fertilization, where legal remedy is sought under Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Both judgments are in favor of the states against which complaints are filed by individuals: the Court ruled that national regulations have not violated the right to respect for the individual's private life. |
topic |
biomedically assisted fertilization right to respect for private life right to respect the decision to become a genetic parent right of couples to conceive a child and to use medically assisted fertilization |
url |
http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2011/0550-21791103313B.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bordasbernadet issuesofbiomedicallyassistedfertilizationbeforetheeuropeancourtofhumanrights |
_version_ |
1725994455177101312 |